Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S.-Israeli cyberattack on Iran was ‘act of force,’ NATO study found
Washington Times ^ | 3/24/13 | Shaun Waterman

Posted on 03/26/2013 2:32:26 PM PDT by LibWhacker

The 2009 cyberattack by the U.S. and Israel that crippled Iran’s nuclear program by sabotaging industrial equipment constituted “an act of force” and was likely illegal under international law, according to a manual commissioned by NATO’s cyber defense center in Estonia.

“Acts that kill or injure persons or destroy or damage objects are unambiguously uses of force,” according to “The Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare.”

Michael N. Schmitt, the manual’s lead author, told The Washington Times that “according to the U.N. charter, the use of force is prohibited, except in self-defense.”

Under the charter, states may use force in self-defense — and that, some argue, includes “anticipatory self-defense” against an incipient or imminent attack.

The international group of researchers who wrote the manual were unanimous that Stuxnet — the self-replicating cyberweapon that destroyed Iranian centrifuges that were enriching uranium — was an act of force, said Mr. Schmitt, professor of international law at the U.S. Naval War College in Newport, R.I.

But they were divided on whether its effects were severe enough to constitute an “armed attack,” he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cyberattack; estonia; force; illegal; iran; israel; nato; russia; stuxnet; waronterror

1 posted on 03/26/2013 2:32:26 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Really? You mean that THIS was not a 'workplace accident'?
Why does NO ONE care, anymore?


2 posted on 03/26/2013 2:33:52 PM PDT by Diogenesis (De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Quak me up. When is the king going to say he knew nothing about that attack? And is he going to throw anyone under the bus this time in order to stay in good graces with the UN so he can become king of the universe?


3 posted on 03/26/2013 2:35:13 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
There is so much wrong with this story.

When did NATO base it's cyber defense center in Estonia? Couldn't they get it any closer to Moscow?

Why was this report made public?

How does NATO have the nerve to publish a report critical of it's most important member?

NATO died when they made war against Serbia. I still don't know which NATO country was attacked by Serbia.

The last nail in the coffin was when Afghanistan attacked the US on 9/11. Most NATO members stood by and did nothing, or offered very little support.

4 posted on 03/26/2013 2:54:47 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

NATO, the organization totally dependent on American might for protection, authorized this study?


5 posted on 03/26/2013 3:08:16 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks LibWhacker.
Michael N. Schmitt, the manual’s lead author, told The Washington Times that "according to the U.N. charter, the use of force is prohibited, except in self-defense."


offsite sidebars:
6 posted on 03/26/2013 3:22:46 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Tough shit.


7 posted on 03/26/2013 5:02:07 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

NATO was never anything but a bunch of parasites sucking off of the US.

NATO needs to end and end now.


8 posted on 03/27/2013 10:08:43 AM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Esto ppl should be quiet otherwise the Ruskis will take over the Baltic republics again.


9 posted on 04/02/2013 9:00:51 AM PDT by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson