Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Demands American Sheriffs Enforce Gun Control
Freedom Outpost ^ | Mar. 29, 2013 | Tim Brown

Posted on 03/29/2013 1:25:10 PM PDT by EXCH54FE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-71 last
To: EXCH54FE

Not like it’s the top priority over murder and assault and other felonies. It’s the bottom priority, if they have the time.


51 posted on 03/29/2013 2:58:09 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

I face a similar challenge, we must not upset Dear Leader.


52 posted on 03/29/2013 3:03:57 PM PDT by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Demands, demands, demands.

Sorry you two bit wanna be dictator, you aint gettin your way this time.

Pathetic pile of dung.


53 posted on 03/29/2013 3:09:36 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

That'll spark Civil War II. I have no problem standing up to defend my Sheriff. He's got my back; I've got his.


54 posted on 03/29/2013 3:16:35 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

The White House is starting to sound like that fat kid over in North Korea. Hey Jay, why not release a photo showing how DC will fire drone missiles at Sheriffs who do not comply with the demands from the Socialist Dictators.


55 posted on 03/29/2013 3:30:05 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

White Hut demands - really demands. So what if the sheriffs do not comply - Now I get it the Dept of Homeland Security will show up with the MRAP vehicles, and expend some of the ammo purchases in that county. watch out Oklahoma they will be coming after you first just like the health exchanges. The Feds have chosen 1 state to isolate and ram everything through there first and foremost. If the state does not comply - annihilate the people in the state and spread from there - strike fear in America’s heartland.


56 posted on 03/29/2013 3:31:00 PM PDT by hondact200 (Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Obama on enforcing Federal Marijuana law, “We have bigger fish to fry.”


57 posted on 03/29/2013 3:42:21 PM PDT by LZ_Bayonet ( I AM THE TEA PARTY LEADER !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

FUBO


58 posted on 03/29/2013 3:56:48 PM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
Geez, is it just me, or is the White House sounding more and more like North Korea with its demands, threats, and warnings?

Isn't that the operation procedure of a communists dictator? Can't see to get the title of communists black Muslim to stick. Maybe the uninformed are still in denial.

59 posted on 03/29/2013 4:18:49 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Truth2012

“Strange times we live in when the US government is at war with the citizens, but that is what we got right now.”

That’s a fact.


60 posted on 03/29/2013 4:57:23 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Trial by his peers? In his /her county? Yeah, right.


61 posted on 03/29/2013 5:04:23 PM PDT by jch10 (Hey GOP! Only Conservatives get my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

But leave the illegals (a.k.a. undocumented democrats) alone. The country is in the hands of fools.


62 posted on 03/29/2013 6:21:18 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
You have such a way with words.

:-)

63 posted on 03/29/2013 6:39:06 PM PDT by EXCH54FE (Hurricane 416,Feisty Old Vet !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

“...In fact, they reflect the president’s commitment to (destroy) our Second Amendment rights.” (my parenthesis)

How can these people make such ridiculous statements without laughing out loud?


64 posted on 03/29/2013 8:25:19 PM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (One "bitter clinger" praying for revival. <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Exciting Times,,,


65 posted on 03/29/2013 10:16:37 PM PDT by Big Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; ..
FReeper E. Pluribus Unum wrote:
So they are supposed to enforce federal gun control laws, but ignore federal immigration laws?

Can't have it both ways

An excellent and salient point. Unfortunately, since law means nothing to the power-hungry mobsters currently running the federal leviathan, they WILL have it both ways.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

66 posted on 03/30/2013 5:20:53 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The "American People" are no longer capable of self-governance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

They’ll enforce them on me; I wouldn’t trust any LEO with my guns, never.


67 posted on 03/30/2013 1:11:20 PM PDT by Tory II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

No. It is more like the senseless rantings of a dictator who is powerless outside his own borders.


68 posted on 03/31/2013 6:46:25 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
“I think as a general proposition we think that people ought to follow the law.

General proposition, Mr. Carney!? The Executive branch of the government is responsible for enforcement of ALL laws. Although, your regime likes to pick and choose which laws to enforce...

You know, Jay, like voting rights, or maybe DOMA, or maybe gun smuggling and killing without due process? I could go on...

This regime reminds me of King George.

5.56mm

69 posted on 03/31/2013 6:52:29 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

BTTT


70 posted on 04/01/2013 2:10:44 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
Seriously, this should be applied to Ms. Davis and those who think like her, not upstanding sheriffs who are dismissing unlawful laws.

I have stated many times, and I will no doubt state it many more, that one should never use the term "law" to describe an illegitimate statute. Laws are, by definition, legitimate; hence, unconstitutional statutes are not laws. A statute which is contrary to the Constitution does not become illegitimate merely as a consequence of a court's declaring it to be thus. Nothing in the Constitution says that Congressional legislation shall have unlimited authority between the time it is passed and the time a court strikes it down.

It's ironic that Marbury v. Madison has been misread both as giving Courts carte blanche to make things Constitutional or not, and as giving Congress and the Executive carte blanche to do whatever they want until such time as the Court orders them to stop. The Marbury v. Madison claim that the Court's job is to say what the law means is true, but that doesn't mean that whatever the Court says should be deemed law. If the Court decides a case in conformance with all applicable laws (including the Constitution), then what the Court says and what the laws mean will be one and the same thing. If the Court decides a case in a manner that isn't in conformance with applicable laws, however, what it says and what the law means would differ.

71 posted on 04/01/2013 4:55:47 PM PDT by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson