Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. K

I’ve tried & tried explaining significant digits to both Libs & normal, run of the mill ignoramuses, with zero comprehension on their part.

Worse yet is LEAST SIGNIFICANT DIGIT, when measurements have been made with multiple instruments that have different degrees of accuracy & precision.

Oh, that’s right; they also don’t understand the difference between ACCURACY & PRECISION. It draws a blank stare, followed by, “yeah, right; whatever,” when you try to explain that a precise reading can still be an inaccurate measurement.


32 posted on 04/01/2013 6:02:07 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ApplegateRanch

Thank you! Yes, it is coming back to me on “Worse yet is LEAST SIGNIFICANT DIGIT, “

So if you try to compile data consisting of studying bacteria, tree rings, and accurate thermometer readings, the accuracy is limited by the least accurate measurement put in the mix. So the entire enterprise is no more accurate than making guesses based on studying long-dead bacteria.


33 posted on 04/01/2013 8:38:43 PM PDT by Moseley (http://www.curesocialism.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: ApplegateRanch

its surprising how difficult some people find that concept


35 posted on 04/02/2013 5:21:52 PM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson