Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grundle

The AHCA actually started life in the House as some completely different bill, from what I understand. Once it got to the Senate, it was hollowed out completely and reconstituted in its current form. Thus, this suit will be found to have no merit, since technically the bill met the requirements for a revenue bill.


4 posted on 04/01/2013 11:22:49 PM PDT by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Little Pig

I wonder what PLF’s response to that line of argument is. If it is true, then they must be aware of it, and presumably they don’t want to be viewed as vexatious at the USSC level lol...


9 posted on 04/02/2013 12:24:19 AM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Little Pig

Thanks for telling me that. Then I agree with you - this lawsuit has no merit. I was wrong.


10 posted on 04/02/2013 12:54:00 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Little Pig
The AHCA actually started life in the House as some completely different bill, from what I understand. Once it got to the Senate, it was hollowed out completely and reconstituted in its current form. Thus, this suit will be found to have no merit, since technically the bill met the requirements for a revenue bill.

Well if any bill can be made into a revenue bill simply by using the "strip and fill" method, why have any requirement about revenue bills originating in the House at all?

If all bills can be made into a revenue bill just by stripping out the House's non-revenue related bill and inserting revenue related stuff, we'd have no need for such a requirement. Hence the contradiction argues to invalidate. In fact, I assert that this is ONE of the major reasons that 0dumbo did not want the bill to be written using "taxes".

...wonder what the judges will see.

24 posted on 04/02/2013 3:58:30 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Little Pig

AH yes, the House bill WAS a revenue bill but was completely stripped out and replaced with ppcaca or whatever it is.

Was it returned to conference, voted, and returned to the full House and voted or was some chicanery involved. I presume THAT is the nature of the suit... the subsequent requirements for passage when the Senate amends a revenue bill.


25 posted on 04/02/2013 4:07:10 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Little Pig
The AHCA actually started life in the House as some completely different bill, from what I understand. Once it got to the Senate, it was hollowed out completely and reconstituted in its current form.

Oh.... you mean like a virus.

32 posted on 04/02/2013 6:51:51 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson