Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hobby Lobby granted full court hearing for mandate case
cna ^ | April 1, 2013 | Adelaide Darling

Posted on 04/02/2013 9:06:14 AM PDT by NYer

Hobby Lobby. Courtesy of the Becket Fund.

Washington D.C., Apr 1, 2013 / 05:02 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Christian-owned craft giant Hobby Lobby will be able to make its appeal against the federal contraception mandate before a full federal panel of nine judges, rather than the usual three.

“Full court review is reserved only for the most serious legal questions,” explained Kyle Duncan, general counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in a press release on March 29. The Becket Fund is representing the owners of Hobby Lobby in court. 

Duncan said that the decision to grant a full nine-judge hearing speaks to the gravity of the issue.

“This case asks whether the First Amendment protects everyone’s right to religious freedom, or whether it leaves out religious business owners like the Greens,” he explained.

As its religious freedom case comes before a federal court, Hobby Lobby had petitioned for an “en banc” hearing, or an appeals hearing before the full bench of nine judges.

“We are grateful that the court granted Hobby Lobby’s petition,” said Duncan.

The arts and crafts retailer is one of well over 100 plaintiffs challenging a mandate issued by the Department of Health and Human Services to require employers to provide contraception, some abortion-inducing drugs and sterilizations.

A narrow religious exemption included in the mandate does not apply to for-profit businesses run by religious individuals.

Since its founding in an Oklahoma City garage in 1972, Hobby Lobby has grown to more than 500 stores in 40 states. Its founder and CEO, David Green, and his family describe themselves as committed Christians who strive to serve God through all their endeavors, including their business.

The Greens donate large amounts of money to charitable causes, maintain a minimum wage that is significantly higher than that required by federal law and close their stores on Sundays, sacrificing profit to allow their employees to worship and rest.

As Christians, the Greens also object to funding or facilitating any drugs that can cause abortions, including the “morning after” and “week after” pills. Their lawsuit argues that their First Amendment guarantees of religious freedom are being violated through the mandate’s demands.

Both a federal district court and an appeals court initially denied an injunction that would have blocked the mandate from going into effect while Hobby Lobby argued its case.

The courts said that although the Greens express their sincere religious beliefs through their company, they did not feel that those beliefs were directly burdened by the mandate’s requirements.

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor denied the company’s emergency injunction appeal in December, saying that the case did not meet the extreme standard necessary for the Supreme Court to intervene.

Without an injunction, Hobby Lobby was faced with up to $1.3 million per day in fines for violating the mandate, beginning Jan. 1 of this year.

In January, however, the retailer released a statement saying it had found a way delay the crippling fines by “shift(ing) the plan year for its employee health insurance, thus postponing the effective date of the mandate for several months.”

The company has said that despite the threat of staggering fines, it will continue fighting to exercise its owners’ religious beliefs in its policies.

In addition to granting a full panel of judges for the appeal, the 10th Circuit also said in its March 29th response to Hobby Lobby’s plea that it will “grant the pending request to expedite oral argument,” thereby accelerating the appeals process.

The court said that a date for the appeals case will be set soon. Arguments are expected to take place in the spring.

TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: bhohealthcare; contraception; hhs; hobbylobby; lawsuit; mandate; obamacare; religiousliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: BitWielder1; txrangerette

Virginia as well. When I lived there you could purchase a an insurance waiver from the state for something like $100. That may have changed in the the intervening time.

41 posted on 04/03/2013 5:57:44 AM PDT by jboot (It can happen here because it IS happening here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: NYer
really appreciate this update, good luck to those people, hehe.
42 posted on 04/03/2013 8:22:11 AM PDT by Drawn7979
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Prayers up in this pathetic “fundamentally change(ling) society. God help us all with all the immorality and ...oh heck, just praying here.

43 posted on 04/03/2013 2:01:51 PM PDT by Karliner ( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28- 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

NH is one of them.

44 posted on 04/04/2013 1:55:37 AM PDT by sopwith (don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson