Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amendment10

Why do people call thoses federal employees in black robes justices? What is ‘just’ about their careless disregard of the limits of the Federal Constitution?

What is ‘just’ about their completely unbounded edicts?

What is ‘just’ about the way they almost always just rubber stamp their apposing ecustive and leglsators acts?

What is ‘just’ about theses corrupt federal employees in black robes? There is hardly more justice on the federal bench than exist in the halls of congress or the Whitehorse. Indeed in many respects their is much less.

So I shall not call them ‘justices’ but injustices.

By the way the 1925 Federal court that invented the incorporation doctrine did so rejecting not only the words of the amendments author, but 2 prior Federal court rulings on the subject.

It was indeed a results driven edict.


15 posted on 04/03/2013 8:56:20 PM PDT by Monorprise (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Monorprise

Given that Judicial Review is not a power given to the Court by the Constitution, and given the hash that the Court made in Dred Scot, the fact that the Court was not forever disgraced, it has become a tool whereby the national elite can avoid the political process.


17 posted on 04/03/2013 9:17:29 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson