SCIENCE shows that it takes a male and a female to produce a baby. That’s why same sex marriage is a fraud.
If our Constitution can be interpreted that people have a right to violate nature, then it needs to be changed to reflect science.
BTW We can love people without having sex with them.
So you are saying that as a retired widow, if I marry it will be a fraud because I cannot produce a baby? BTW, I don’t think I could love a man in the Eros sense without wanting to have sex with him. Many in this country fail to understand the difference between Eros and Agape.
While on the subject of compelling arguments, let’s consider the case of the disenfranchised citizens of Washington, DC. They pay 100% federal income taxes, but have no Senate or voting House of Representatives delegates. This is clearly “taxation without representation.” What are all the pro legal/economic rights people going to do about that? To quote the article, “The compelling argument is on the side of [the DC citizens],” O’Reilly said Tuesday on Fox. “That’s where the compelling argument is. ‘We’re Americans. We just want to be treated like everybody else.’ That’s a compelling argument, and to deny that, you have got to have a very strong argument on the other side.” What is the argument on the other side???
RE: SCIENCE shows that it takes a male and a female to produce a baby. Thats why same sex marriage is a fraud.
Pro-gay marriage have a very easy argument against this -— Artificial Insemination for Lesbian Couples and Surrogates for Male Couples.
Barring that, they can always adopt.
This argument has been tried and the response has always been thusly.