Posted on 04/08/2013 1:11:57 PM PDT by EXCH54FE
I guess that is possible. ;)
Good Post
As Law Enforcement employees become more a part of the Federal Government, expect this percentage of public service “you know our so called government helpers” support to fall, especially the upholders of our laws. Today we have their backing but do not expect this to hold for much longer. After all, their salaries depend on us providing them and they will do whatever is required to keep their monies on track. It does seem like a vicious circle to me.
This does seem to be a continuing effort to undermine the members of law enforcement and also undermine the Constitution. I doubt that we will have the right to bear arms for many more years. This is an incremental effect of socialism/federalism/Marxism and just about all other types of “isms”. Eventually, the power of the people will be undermined without regard of our Constitution. It’s all for the good of the people you know...or of course the children.
Pretty much agrees with everything the NRA has been saying for years, yet the NRA is portrayed in the lamestream media as out of touch. So typical.
As a retired thirty year LEO I have always supported and encouraged citizens to arm themselves Why? Because it is a Constitutional right, but more importantly sometimes we just can’t get there fast enough.
There are 855,000 LE professionals in USA. This survey represents not even 2%. [1.75%]
Wow that’s a HUGE number.
No wonder our state and local budgets are in such trouble.
There are 313,914,040 Americans. A recent poll says that 90% of Americans are in favor of universal background checks.
The Quinnipiac University poll was conducted March 26-April 1, with 1,711 registered voters questioned by telephone. The survey's overall sampling error is plus or minus 2.4 percentage points.
The latter survey represents squat.
Great information. Thanks.
Bookmarked!
“This survey represents not even 2%. [1.75%]”
That’s a huge sample, statistically.
yep- it`s better than nothing- but I`ll bet there is a large disparity between city LEO`s and small-town LEO`s.
The survey numbers are, on their face, encouraging, and I hope they are an accurate indicator of LE as a whole. I'm not familiar w/ policeone.com, so I'm not sure if it tends to slant right, but there's the danger of that bias in the sample leading to a misleading skew.
I would also think that police actively involved in a profession oriented website might be those who got into law enforcement for the right reasons,(i.e., sense of community service, a legitimate passion for justice, etc.), and may not represent the views of those who signed up for the badge and the gun, the union perks, etc., which would also distort the sample.
This includes the BUM Obummer who cannot even purchase a gun because he cannot pass the FFL background check.
This disqualifies him, the BUM Obummer, to be president because he is the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and he cannot even buy a gun. hahaha!
Common crooks use 'no questions asked' buy back programs to dump weapons low quality weapons they've stolen - then they use the cash to upgrade.
The lowlife who shoots your daughter with a new weapon? He got the money for his shiny new gun from a 'buyback'...
We’ll see where the majority of them stand when “the order” is given and their pensions are on the line.
I have long felt that using a gun in commission of a crime should result in a mandatory “forever” sentence to a jail in a backward African nation where we build the facility and contract for locals to oversee the prisoners care and feeding. Cheaper by far, no danger of escapes, and pretty soon no one would think of carrying a gun for criminal purposes
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.