Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RinaseaofDs
I'd suggest, as a tactical matter, reserving the invective for the abuser. That would be Mark Kelley in this case. He's following in the foul, polluted footsteps of Sarah Brady and Carolyn McCarthy.

There's nothing, I think, that you could say about him that would bother me in the slightest. He's the lowest of the low.

27 posted on 04/09/2013 12:45:43 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: ArrogantBustard

I’m in full and complete agreement. I do want to point something out - her district went without representation for quite a while. She could have resigned, and indeed had the capacity to understand what resignation meant, and did not resign.

Nobody should ever be shot in the head for no good reason (and there are good reasons). That being what it is, they are both whores, she and her husband.

She could have retired, and then wrote a book or something. They held on to the seat instead.

At this point, you have to ask yourself (hijacking alert:), “What would make a person spend $55 million on an election to an office that pays less than $200K?”

I’m not referring to Gifford or Kelley here, but anyone, like Corzine maybe, that would spend $20M to win an office that pays less than $200K . . .

What makes that exchange of value a relevant one, and what does that say about this system already being destroyed beyond repair?


32 posted on 04/09/2013 1:11:02 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson