Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sparks fly in S.C. congressional campaign (Sanford vs. Colbert)
CNN Political Ticker ^ | April 9, 2013 | Paul Steinhauser

Posted on 04/09/2013 5:03:43 PM PDT by yongin

With less than a month to go until a high profile special election to fill a vacant congressional seat in South Carolina, things are heating up. Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch, the sister of satirist and Comedy Central host Stephen Colbert, Tuesday released her first ad of the general election campaign. Her Republican opponent, former Gov. Mark Sanford, whose political career was sidetracked back in 2009 thanks to a well-publicized affair, was quick to respond and criticize Colbert Busch, and he also accepted invitations to four debates between now and the May 7 contest. "I'm Elizabeth Colbert Busch, and as a single mom raising three young children, I had to be independent and do what's right for them. Now, I'm going to take that lesson to Congress," says Colbert Bush in the commercial, speaking directly into the camera. "I won't take any special interest pledges or follow any party line. To create jobs in South Carolina, we need a well-educated and skilled workforce and we need to get rid of government waste. The deficit is killing jobs." The Sanford campaign was quick to respond to the Colbert Bush spot, with spokesman Joel Sawyer saying that that it's "fairly ironic that she's now against the deficit, after advocating for the trillion dollar, budget-busting, failed stimulus which raised deficits, and for Obamacare, which many argue is one of the biggest tax increases in American history." The release of the new ad came as the Boeing company announced Tuesday that it's expanding in South Carolina, saying it will invest $1 billion and create 2,000 jobs over the next eight years in the Palmetto State.

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: busch; colbert; colbertbusch; congress; elizabethbusch; house; joelsawyer; marksanford; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; sanford; sc2013; southcarolina; stephencolbert

1 posted on 04/09/2013 5:03:43 PM PDT by yongin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; Impy; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj

Sanford wants 4 debates with Stephen Colbert’s sister. CNN wants to moderate one debate. What’s next? Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart moderating the debate? In the primary, Sanford’s vote totals exceeded Colbert’s votes. In a low key, low turnout race, Sanford wins. However, in a high profile race with lots of media attention, turnout could be higher and give Sanford some problems.


2 posted on 04/09/2013 5:08:11 PM PDT by yongin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yongin

Sanford gave himself problems. Again, the best republicans have to offer?


3 posted on 04/09/2013 5:13:56 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yongin

It will be amusing to see Colbert’s sister pretending to be patriotic and pretending to believe in God and pretending to respect the faith’s of SC voters.


4 posted on 04/09/2013 5:27:46 PM PDT by fkabuckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
Sanford gave himself problems. Again, the best republicans have to offer?

This is who Republican primary voters cast ballots for. There were plenty of other options, yet supposedly conservative values voters from the 1st congressional (R+11) district in South Carolina voted to nominate Mark Sanford. And then they went and voted for him again in the runoff. There is no excuse. People can't keep blaming the party for rotten candidates. At some point the actual voters are to blame - even ones that claim to be traditional conservatives.

5 posted on 04/09/2013 5:40:57 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fkabuckeyesrule
It will be amusing to see Colbert’s sister pretending to be patriotic and pretending to believe in God and pretending to respect the faith’s of SC voters.

Probably better at it than the unscrupulous philanderer the witless Republicans are running for that office.

6 posted on 04/09/2013 5:57:07 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Well, it is obvious morals no longer matter to most voters so I shouldn’t be surprised.


7 posted on 04/09/2013 6:00:47 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madprof98; ilovesarah2012

DC is already a cesspool of moral and ethical reprobates. If we’re to send one, too, I’d rather they have the proven record of cutting government spending rather than a pious rodent who never will cut an ounce of fat. In the ‘70s, two Catholic Priests were elected to Congress (one from Massachusetts, another from Wisconsin), and both were Democrats who voted like Karl Marx (and the one from MA was easily succeeded by Barney Frank).


8 posted on 04/09/2013 6:09:17 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yongin

All Dems run as ‘independents’ LOL!

I’m interested to see how much the national media succeeds in influencing this race.
Hard for the national media to affect a House race, and that frustrates them.


9 posted on 04/09/2013 6:21:14 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yongin
Get to know the <p>.
10 posted on 04/09/2013 6:34:22 PM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yongin
South Carolina Ping
Send FReepmail to join or leave this list.

Keep up with what our Congresscritters are doing. Sign up for the free MegaVote email service here.

I'm ashamed of my fellow South Carolinians for putting this man up. He doesn't represent South Carolina values. At least I hope he doesn't.

11 posted on 04/09/2013 6:45:08 PM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
Well, it is obvious morals no longer matter to most voters so I shouldn’t be surprised.

People are left with morals over fiscal conservatism. Mark Sanford, for all his moral transgressions, is a true fiscal conservative. His fiscal conservatism is what won him the primary.

Is a liar always a liar about everything? Probably not. The voters will sort them out here. God will sort them out in the end.

12 posted on 04/09/2013 6:48:46 PM PDT by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yongin

If she takes the conservative line and Sanford has a sex and adultery problem, maybe bothe of them are in the wrong party. An educated electorate would reject them both and ask for a Tea Party candidate.


13 posted on 04/09/2013 6:55:29 PM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yongin

I’m tired of the whining freepers who would rather see a hollywood backed liberal win than a conservative who cheated on his wife. Grow up people.


14 posted on 04/09/2013 10:40:51 PM PDT by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Impy; yongin
I’m tired of the whining freepers who would rather see a hollywood backed liberal win than a conservative who cheated on his wife. Grow up people.

I'm always impressed by the logic and lack of Morality of those who chastise those who find objectionable the infidelity of creeps like Sanford.

First of all, no-one is saying they'd rather that a Hollywood backed liberal win anything, but go right ahead and smear righteous Freepers. It seems to be the MO of GOP-E types who attempt to badger conservatives to vote for their failed candidates.
15 posted on 04/09/2013 11:20:10 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

You may not have said it but yes freepers have said they’d rather Sanford lose. One lady even told she hopes “everybody votes for Colbert”.

I guess they are all sin free.

“It seems to be the MO of GOP-E types who attempt to badger conservatives to vote for their failed candidates.”

The establishment Republicans in SC hated Sanford’s guts cause he was a conservative.

But you are damn right I will “badger” people who are being fools. They are enabling the enemy, period, end of story.


16 posted on 04/10/2013 12:38:16 AM PDT by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama

Pretty sad there isn’t a fiscal conservative who also isn’t a lying cheater. And I think name recognition won him the primary. Republicans have plenty of low information voters, too.


17 posted on 04/10/2013 4:05:20 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Grow up people.

Yeah, in the real world, all that matters is how many expensive toys you take with you to the grave.

18 posted on 04/10/2013 7:43:59 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Impy
who cheated on his wife.

Who left his post doing said cheating, and stuck the taxpayers with the bill.

19 posted on 04/10/2013 7:45:08 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Impy
I guess they are all sin free.

The same bible that relates the story of Jesus stating to those condemning and attempting to stone the harlot that those without sin cast the first stone, also commands Christians to rebuke those in sin and to judge righteous judgment.
20 posted on 04/10/2013 8:08:30 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: madprof98; dfwgator; SoConPubbie
Yeah, in the real world, all that matters is how many expensive toys you take with you to the grave.

No Mr. Sarcastic face, what matters is the GOVERNANCE of the country, not one man's personal failings.

Yeah it was wrong he stepped out on the wife, yeah it was wrong he snuck away to see his lover. He misused public funds (payed back 74K) to visit his lover, that was very wrong. I wouldn't have chosen to nominate him but the voters who know him best picked him by a wide margin.

Now Obama, Obama is raping the whole country, up the rear, and Colbert-Busch WANTS TO HELP HIM. She wants to cheer him on, waving her pom poms as he continues to rape America.

We have a man who cheated on his wife that will vote the right way versus a woman backed to the hilt by hollywood filth who loves Obama, supports gay marriage, supports abortion on demand and wants Pelosi back in the Speaker's chair.

That's the end of the conversation as far as I'm concerned. If you can't support Sanford, fine. But don't slime him, that aides the enemy and that is not acceptable. Get some perspective. Adultery and a minor financial scandal weighed against the systematic gang rape of the republic? Come on.

21 posted on 04/10/2013 2:12:45 PM PDT by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson