Toronto dad upset he's not allowed to watch daughter's swim class

Toronto Sun via Jihad Watch ^ | April 6, 2013 | By Jenny Yuen Toronto Sun

[ButThreeLeftsDo]

[NYer]

thanks for the photo ... looks somewhat like a smurf.

[dennisw]

Quality time for a father to bond with his daughter and primitive, false prophet addicted Muslims ruin it. How many Muslims are paying taxes to pay for this swimming pool compared to the non-Muslims who have no hangup with father/daughter time at the pool.

I’ll bet this pool is not in a Muzz neighborhood and that very few Muzz are paying (taxes) for it

[liberalh8ter]

Swimmer Smurf?

[MrBambaLaMamba]

Death to Islam

[from occupied ga]

Death to Islam

You have the wrong villain. The real problem is the government that inflicts this crap on the rest of the population at the behest of the muslims. The tail is once again wagging the dog, and the government is forcing it to so so. If the government said no to the muslims as readily as it said no to the christians there wouldn't be a problem.

[SampleMan]

But if he were gay, he could watch the little boys swim class.

People are terrified that every heterosexual man is just waiting to abuse little girls, but they reject the notion altogether that homosexual men might abuse little boys.

[Squawk 8888]

To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.

Canada Ping!

[Alberta's Child]

It goes beyond that. Islam isn't the problem. There are any number of religious groups that might have similar (or other) social/moral concerns (Orthodox Jews, for example) about their people in public places.

The real problem here is that you're seeing the failure of multiculturalism in its entirety -- and it's total incompatibility with any social/political system that is predicated on massive government oversight and involvement in matters. The problem isn't Islam ... the problem is the whole idea of a public swimming pool -- and the abject idiocy of a municipal government in which taxpayers actually foot the bill for a person called the "city aquatics manager."

[JudyinCanada]

We’re talking about Toronto - they’re coming out of the woodwork up here. Every neighbourhood is populated to some degree with them - Canada is rolling over and playing dead for them, city by city.

I’ve never seen such intimidation on such a large scale as what is going on concerning muslims. We even arrange our seating in our classrooms to appease them - a girl must not have a boy on either side, in front, or behind her. We’re nuts.

[ArrogantBustard]

Smurfs are merely annoying.

Mohammedans destroy civilisation.

[exit82]

Looks like John F’n Kerry touring the Kennedy Space Center in 2004.

[Mygirlsmom]

That's the thing about liberals - they will staunchly defend opposite sides of an argument with absolutely no thought of hypocrisy.

These would be the same fools who have absolutely no problem telling you why prayer in school or Christmas displays in the public square can't be tolerated.

[Savage Beast]

"If any parents wish to watch their child who is enrolled in a female or male-only swim class, they would have to move them to a mixed boys/girls class that runs three days a week."

What's wrong with that?

I'd be pretty annoyed. I've taken my kids to swimming lessons. Not only do I want to be there for supervision and their safety but to monitor their progress.

However, it seems that under the circumstances I would merely have asked to shift my daughter to the mixed boys/girls class.

[MrB]

Understand that “multiculturalism” is just a facade over anti-Christianity.

[MrB]

That’s because they aren’t hypocrites, really.
They may LIE about their beliefs,

but their beliefs are entirely consistently anti-Christian.

If you look at it from that angle, they start to make more sense.

[Savage Beast]

" - a girl must not have a boy on either side, in front, or behind her."

Yes. That's nuts.

[ASA Vet]

General Chat three days ago

[from occupied ga]

the problem is the whole idea of a public swimming pool -- and the abject idiocy of a municipal government in which taxpayers actually foot the bill for a person called the "city aquatics manager."

I agree - kind of my thoughts, but you stated it better than I did.