Skip to comments.Bipartisan deal reached on gun background checks
Posted on 04/10/2013 7:39:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
The word “bipartisan” means that some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out.
The House says: No.............
COMPLETE AND UTTER BULLSH|T.
If you buy a gun on the Internet, it has to go through the NICS check. If you buy a gun at a gun show from an FFL, it has to go through a NICS check.
I believe this whole thing is a ruse to get through a law that says all "transfers"--not sales--have to go through a licensed dealer. Therefore, I cannot lend my buddy or nephew or uncle a gun.
“Bipartisan deal reached” means America loses more of their liberty.
bipartisan means the republican caved, the democrats killed a rino and/or some REALLY BIG LIE is happening.
“The House says: No.......”
Do you have any links to support that? My understanding is that Boehner already caved also.
I feel confident that both of my backstabbing RINO sonofabitch Senators are going to screw me and any other freedom loving Georgian in the back.
Since Saxby his finally shown his true color and won’t run (I’ll not vote for another GOB appeaser for that spot), and good ole Isakson is up in 4 years for re-election, I’ll try to stay alive until then and vote against them or their chosen successors.
Tyrant Kim Un Hussein must be very pleased that his efforts to FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA are progressing so easily.
Usually someone buys me dinner and few drinks before they try to do this to me...
And I thought “bipartisan” meant Stupid and Criminal
I would not bet on it.
They KNOW this. ALL of them KNOW this. They aren’t about the truth. They are about getting a foothold law establishing a universal (of sorts) background check law nationally. You will then see, maybe before 2014, a hell-bent-for-leather push to translate that act into a NATIONAL REGISTRY, which is what they are really after. It is so because that registry is the foundation for an effective confiscation of guns from all Americans opposing Obama and the Democrats.
We havebeen sold down the river one more time.
this is junk because ALL online sales have to go to an ffl FIRST then to you.
If we do an online check then there should be no middle ffl.
This is just to track via internet capture, ala illegal warrentless searches and credit checks for any transactions.
sort of the way the feds capture all email and internet communications.
I thought maybe I’d be so fortunate as to pass away before America became completely communist or tyrannical, a nation without law .... (or with “laws” and pigs in charge like in Animal Farm)
(Alas, it was not to be...)
We need to VOTE THESE anti-American Senators OUT OF OFFICE (if there are still elections next time)... I am going to make a list of all their names and send political campaign contributions to their opponents (of either party)...
background check is only there so they know where you are so they can take your weapons
Soon you will need “proof of registry” in order to buy ammo, thus negating the exclusion of “grandfathered”, presently owned firearms.
They can call it a deal.
It’s a sellout.
Toomey will pay for this at the polls.
they’re my two idiot SINators as well. i called them yesterday and they are feeling the heat. told isackson if he supported this nonsense i would not vote for him.
This doesn't pass the stink test - there is something fishy going on here.
All commercial sales already require a background check so, as presented here, this bill would change nothing.
And we know that's not going to happen.
So what is the real purpose of the bill?
There is probably some sort of Clintonion weasle-word parsing in the specifics that will enable future expansion of the government's powers to control and/or restrict gun sales and transfers.
You can trust these politicians about as far as you could toss Queen Michelle, uphill and against the wind.
I don’t even get answers to my emails to him any more. He knows what I think about his worthless ass.
Just give your address as “1060 West Addison Street Chicago Il.”
Throughout this whole debate, it has amazed me how much misinformation is spread and how completely wrong people are when they try to present the facts.
As you stated, you CANNOT buy a firearm from a legit FFL, without the checks. If an FFL sells you a gun without one, then there are laws already on the books that deal with that.
The republicans in the Senate are getting played again, as usual. Either that, or Reid has something on them. Hoping that 2014 will usher in some new blood.
I don't think so. They don't like us that much.
The current makeup of the House is 232(R), 201(D) and 2 vacancies.
Boner would have to get 217 to pass it. He wold have to get ALL 201 Dems and 16 Pubbies to do that. Many Dems are from conservative districts and not likely to go along, so it would be a tough row to hoe........
“Now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb.” - Dark Helmet
KILL IT in the House, dammit!
It appears they deleted the word "infringe."
They really didn’t have to cave. The majority of the people are with us. The fact that 32 guns per minute have been purchased under obama tells us everything we need to know.
If you buy a gun on the Internet, it has to go through the NICS check.
Under this proposal, there would be no check if you found it from a free advertising site.
Their goal is an undeclared registry. They have also found our Achilles heel — ammo. All the guns in world do no good if you can’t get ammo or components to load your own ammo. Expect some legislation to make it harder to buy ammo.
And they won't even be using any vaseline , so enjoy it while you can ,they be coming for you....
Right. After all, there are thousands of politicians and politician wannabes out there just salivating over the opportunity to take their turn at the trough.
I wouldn't count on it. The rats have become quite adept at stealing elections AND getting away with it.
And of course, only a licensed FFL can legally make a "commercial" sale.
So there is definately some sort of Obama style Double-Speak involved here.
They will probably have to "pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy".
18 USC § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law
On a quick glance, it appears that the ‘Rats just wanted to pass ANYTHING as a face-saving measure. Even something rather marginal and meaningless.
“See, we tightened up background checks!”
Just how, and where, can you buy a gun over the internet? You can’t.
Liberal Dems will not support this Bill without amendments. Once amendments are passed, it will die.
How bout IGNORE IT. They can make all the phony laws they want. Then try to enforce them!
The war has started and they are the enemy.