Skip to comments.Cho's Chains and Klebold's Correspondence Still Matter
Posted on 04/10/2013 12:03:46 PM PDT by IChing
I know Im not the only one who remembers how, almost exactly 6 years ago at Virginia Tech, mass-murderer Seung-Hui Cho chained and padlocked the doors to an academic building shut.
That was so that he could effectively trap his numerous (32 killed and 23 wounded) , defenseless victims inside except for the handful who managed to breach and exit second story windows, suffering injuries from falling to the ground and to keep the responding police outside for long, crucial minutes while he conducted his murderous rampage.
Cho knew hed face no armed opponent once he had his prey locked inside the building with him. A legislative effort to overturn the ban on concealed-carry on campus had failed the previous year.
Furthermore, Cho had shot and killed two people on the other side of campus earlier that morning, resulting in the focus and resources of those who might otherwise thwart him being diverted away from his bigger plan, while he got everything ready.
Why cant anyone in the gun rights camp at least bring up how relevant Chos strategy and tactics are to the debate over so-called gun-free zones when they go on TV, and when our opponents start badly twisting the narrative?
It all has to do with how Cho, and more recently others like him, have taken pains to prepare their killing fields, especially in relation to others (good guys) who may, or are known to, have guns. This aspect goes to the heart of why ordinary citizens must be armed in public areas. The relative propinquity of armed police or security, despite the claims of many on the side of increased gun control, does not obviate certain places being referred to as gun-free zones according to applicable bans on open and concealed carry for regular
(Excerpt) Read more at clashdaily.com ...
Marxists are irrational-—they only want totalitarian control over everyone. They need our Natural Rights from God-—GONE!
They need our families destroyed (homosexual “marriage”) so that we have no recourse but to cave to the State’s wishes. No support systems.
Destroying Judeo-Christian ethics (individual Rights from God)-—with their forced “Right” to sodomy laws-—reduces us to base instincts with no moral ethics-—no Right and Wrong—according to Natural Laws and God’s Laws-—which virtually throws out our Constitution and makes us into a Rule by Man-—arbitrary (Might makes Right) legal system which forces Satanic ethics on our children, so they have the worldview and understanding and “Ethics” of the little sexist, sodomized, immature Afghani boys who love their harems and pour acid on females. Very sexist societies are homosexual ones like the Samurai and always include pederasty since it is an immature “lifestyle”.
Destroy Virtue-—and you can never have a Free Republic (all the Founders, Cicero, Socrates-—all geniuses in Western Civilization-—what made us different from the inhumane Eastern irrational ideologies).
Ideas matter——slavery is Marxism. Sodomy is the destruction of Virtue-—which is the destruction of Freedom. Licentiousness is NOT the freedom the Founders issued——it is the Freedom of the Virtuous—Civil societies will never be civil if Vice is promoted as a “virtue” which it can never be.
My family has a deal to never say his name.
We have that same deal.....only it’s Obama.......
I see your point....
Thanks! Love your comments! I agree completely!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.