Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

21 NRA A-Rated Senators Part Of 68-31 Vote To Defeat Filibuster Of Background Check Bill
Mediaite.com ^ | 4/11/2013 | Tommy Christopher

Posted on 04/11/2013 6:34:57 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama

The Republican plan to block debate on Senate Bill 649, which requires background checks on almost all gun purchases and transfers, failed spectacularly Thursday morning when sixteen Republican Senators joined almost all of the Democrats to vote in favor opening debate on the bill. Among those voting to defeat the filibuster were 9 Democrats with “A” ratings from the National Rifle Association, and 12 A-rated Republicans (out of 16 Republican “ayes”). Two Democrats, Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) and Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK), joined the majority of Republican Senators who tried to prevent debate, much less a vote, on the bill.

The plan to filibuster the gun reform measure was met with vocal resistance from some Republicans who, even if they disagree with the policy, felt it deserved debate and a straight up-or-down vote. Going into the vote, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he felt confident he had the 60 votes required to overcome a filibuster, but he wasn’t certain. As it turned out, it wasn’t even close. The effect of the Newtown parents’ lobbying efforts this week cannot be underestimated, and today’s vote could be a good omen for gun reform.

The Republicans who voted to debate the bill were Senators Lamar Alexander (R-TN, NRA rating=A), Kelly Ayotte (R-NH, NRA rating=A), Richard Burr (R-NC, NRA rating=A), Saxby Chambliss (R-GA, NRA rating=A), Tom Coburn (R-OK, NRA rating=A), Susan Collins (R-ME, NRA rating=C+), Bob Corker (R-TN, NRA rating=A), Jeff Flake (R-AZ, NRA rating=A), Lindsey Graham (R-SC, NRA rating=A), Dean Heller (R-NV, NRA rating=A), John Hoeven (R-ND, NRA rating=A), Johnny Isakson (R-GA, NRA rating=A), Mark Kirk (R-IL, NRA rating=F), John McCain (R-AZ, NRA rating=B+), Pat Toomey (R-PA, NRA rating=A) and Roger Wicker (R-MS, NRA rating=A+).

(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alaska; US: Arizona; US: Arkansas; US: Georgia; US: Illinois; US: Maine; US: Mississippi; US: Nevada; US: New Hampshire; US: North Carolina; US: North Dakota; US: Oklahoma; US: Pennsylvania; US: South Carolina; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: 113th; alaska; arizona; arkansas; banglist; bloodoftyrants; bobcorker; deanheller; georgia; govtabue; govtabuse; guncontrol; gunreform; harryreid; illinois; jeffflake; johnhoeven; johnmccain; johnnyisakson; kellyayotte; lamaralexander; lindseygraham; maine; markbegich; markkirk; markpryor; mississippi; nevada; newhampshire; newtown; northcarolina; northdakota; nra; oklahoma; pattoomey; pennsylvania; richardburr; rogerwicker; saxbychambliss; secondamendment; senatebill649; southcarolina; susancollins; teapartyvictimhood; tennessee; tomcoburn; traitors; treason; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-113 next last
21 traitors to the Constitution. I'll do my part to see that pansy Graham gets defeated here in SC.
1 posted on 04/11/2013 6:34:58 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

“21 traitors to the Constitution. I’ll do my part to see that pansy Graham gets defeated here in SC.”

Burr from NC voted to debate. Did he turn to the dark side after his dinner with Obama?


2 posted on 04/11/2013 6:37:10 PM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

Meanwhile the bipartisan and loving Democrats in the Senate are blocking a vote to honor Margaret Thatcher.


3 posted on 04/11/2013 6:39:00 PM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

so our house is closed and not a peep from the stupid party, then we pay for this house which is closed to us but they have concerts and then the stupid party lets some of the idiots go to a dinner and now it seems all it takes is a dinner ON OUR DIME to vote for this


4 posted on 04/11/2013 6:41:39 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

THEY ARE
THEY;RE ACTUALLY BLOCKING A VOTE TO HONOR MAGGIE THATCHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I frigging hate the SOB and their low info voters, I can’t even talk to these scum bags anymore.

We live in two different countries today but alas we have to put up with this crap because our reps have no balls


5 posted on 04/11/2013 6:43:34 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
This bill is worse than any ban on some specific models or types of guns. It's a huge foot in the door to trash the 4th Amend., the 5th Amend. and the 10th Amend. as well as the 2nd Amend. Was all of this gun control demagoguery really just a Trojan Horse to sneak this Bill of Rights killer into law?

The Toomey-Manchin Kill The Bill of Rights Bill.

TITLE ONE: GETTING ALL THE NAMES OF PROHIBITED PURCHASERS INTO THE BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM

Summary of Title I: This section improves background checks for firearms by strengthening the instant check system.

- Encourage states to provide all their available records to NICS by restricting federal funds to states who do not comply.

By "all their available records" just what records are they blackmailing states for with that statist bilge water? "All" is a pretty big word when only a very few records are applicable to denying someone their right to keep and bear arms.

- Allow dealers to voluntarily use the NICS database to run background checks on their prospective employees.

Does that means dealers can run NICS checks on prospective employees without their knowledge or consent? I have no idea what the word 'voluntarily' means there. Does it mean dealers will be allowed to not run NICS checks if they prefer not to?

- Clarifies that submissions of mental health records into the NICS system are not prohibited by federal privacy laws (HIPAA).

Submissions of mental health records? Since when has it been legal to deny any American their rights without due process? Isn't it required that a person be adjudicated mentally deficient by a court of law to do that? Mental health records are entirely irrelevant except to those court proceedings. This bill sounds like Stalinist purge material.

- Provides a legal process for a veteran to contest his/her placement in NICS when there is no basis for barring the right to own a firearm.

Is that an admission that the Bill of Rights doesn't cover veterans or an admission that it doesn't cover anyone anymore?

6 posted on 04/11/2013 6:45:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

And just like that “.. shall not be infringed..” is reduced to a bumper sticker slogan..


7 posted on 04/11/2013 6:47:34 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Constitution? What Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth. - George Washington


Click The Pic To Donate

8 posted on 04/11/2013 6:49:59 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

apparently...he lied earlier...never heard him utter next to anything ever while a senator...probably couldn’t talk an hour if he had to and most likely has a bladder or prostate problem too...so couldn’t do his share in a filibuster...but next vote he is gonna get plenty of time to work on those things...maybe our new gov mccory here in nc will want the job of senator


9 posted on 04/11/2013 6:52:27 PM PDT by ldish (Give me Freedom and Liberty or let's kick some a**!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

And the worst part isn’t the background check. REad the section on transportation:

I’m no lawyer, but it seems like this section means that driving across state lines with your side arm holstered would be outlawed. Beyond that, the definition of transportation includes stopping for lodging. So if I stop in Ohio overnight on my way to NC, I can’t load my gun and have it in my room with me. It has to be unloaded, locked, and inaccessible. What does that have to do with shooting kids in a school. But oh, we need this bill to honor the memory of those Newtown kids. What a crock.

And it says that they need probable cause to arrest you for a violation of this law, but most state databases have a list of the CPL holders, so that would probably constitute probable cause for a search. And in any case if pulled over most states require a CPL holder to declare himself as such during a traffic stop, probably also enough to warrant a search.

Look at some of the crap in the senate gun COMPROMISE bill the republicans agreed on:

SEC. 128. INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF FIREARMS OR AMMUNITION.
(a) In General.-Section 926A of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“926A. Interstate transportation of firearms or ammunition
“(a) Definition.-In this section, the term ‘transport’-
“(1) includes staying in temporary lodging overnight, stopping for food, fuel, vehicle maintenance, an emergency, medical treatment, and any other activity incidental to the transport; and
“(2) does not include transportation-
“(A) with the intent to commit a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year that involves a firearm; or
“(B) with knowledge, or reasonable cause to believe, that a crime described in subparagraph (A) is to be committed in the course of, or arising from, the transportation.
“(b) Authorization.-Notwithstanding any provision of any law (including a rule or regulation) of a State or any political subdivision thereof, a person who is not prohibited by this chapter from possessing, transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm or ammunition shall be entitled to-
“(1) transport a firearm for any lawful purpose from any place where the person may lawfully possess, carry, or transport the firearm to any other such place if, during the transportation-
“(A) the firearm is unloaded; and
“(B)(i) if the transportation is by motor vehicle-
“(I) the firearm is not directly accessible from the passenger compartment of the motor vehicle; or
“(II) if the motor vehicle is without a compartment separate from the passenger compartment, the firearm is-
“(aa) in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console; or
“(bb) secured by a secure gun storage or safety device; or
“(ii) if the transportation is by other means, the firearm is in a locked container or secured by a secure gun storage or safety device; and
“(2) transport ammunition for any lawful purpose from any place where the person may lawfully possess, carry, or transport the ammunition, to any other such place if, during the transportation-
“(A) the ammunition is not loaded into a firearm; and
“(B)(i) if the transportation is by motor vehicle-
“(I) the ammunition is not directly accessible from the passenger compartment of the motor vehicle; or
“(II) if the motor vehicle is without a compartment separate from the passenger compartment, the ammunition is in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console; or
“(ii) if the transportation is by other means, the ammunition is in a locked container.
“(c) Limitation on Arrest Authority.-A person who is transporting a firearm or ammunition may not be-
“(1) arrested for violation of any law or any rule or regulation of a State, or any political subdivision thereof, relating to the possession, transportation, or carrying of firearms or ammunition, unless there is probable cause that the transportation is not in accordance with subsection (b); or
“(2) detained for violation of any law or any rule or regulation of a State, or any political subdivision thereof, relating to the possession, transportation, or carrying of firearms or ammunition, unless there is reasonable suspicion that the transportation is not in accordance with subsection (b).”.
(b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.-The table of sections for chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 926A and inserting the following:
“926A. Interstate transportation of firearms or ammunition.”.


10 posted on 04/11/2013 6:52:59 PM PDT by JTHomes (28th: Congress shall make no law respecting economics , or prohibiting the free exercise of markets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

What will the NRA rate the “sorry 21” after this vote?


11 posted on 04/11/2013 6:57:09 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTHomes
This bill is aimed at gutting the Bill of Rights. Infringing on the 2nd Amendment is merely an afterthought.

Seig heil,! volks, this is the turning point where the FedMob takes complete control.

12 posted on 04/11/2013 6:57:33 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
It is.

The figgin’ bill is called ‘Public Safety And Second Amendment Rights Protection Act’.

That should tell you what Manchin and Toomey think, and where Second Amendment Right is placed.

13 posted on 04/11/2013 7:01:22 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Moot point—I think the NRA just learned they have absolutely no clout in DC anymore.


14 posted on 04/11/2013 7:02:56 PM PDT by Arm_Bears (Refuse; Resist; Rebel; Revolt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

I’ve written both the NRA head office and my regional rep to explain to them that if they support any of these treasonous bastards in 2014, I will mail my endowment membership card to them and demand they never send me another communication.

This is a fscking travesty.


15 posted on 04/11/2013 7:05:08 PM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
the nra has lost our support a few years ago when we realized they were supporting leftist democrats....

seems their power was not as strong as they thought....

these chumps better not be begging me for money because none of these senators will get a dime....

16 posted on 04/11/2013 7:06:21 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot; JTHomes

They don’t seem to care much for the 4th, 5th or 10th Amendments either. This opens the door to depriving citizens of all kinds of rights by simply fishing through their medical records. As JTHomes’ post reveals it also creates a legal precedent for significant restrictions on travel which will of course require checkpoints to enforce.


17 posted on 04/11/2013 7:10:08 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

The NRA bootlickers will be along any minute now telling us how great the NRA is in protecting our rights. WRONG.


18 posted on 04/11/2013 7:12:10 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

So will it pass the Senate and does it have a chance in the House?


19 posted on 04/11/2013 7:12:29 PM PDT by GunRunner (***Not associated with any criminal actions by the ATF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil; dbwz

Ping


20 posted on 04/11/2013 7:13:21 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
Um...yes and yes.

Boehner on Hastert Rule: ‘It was never a rule to begin with’ (TRAITOR ALERT)

21 posted on 04/11/2013 7:20:51 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (that's it folks, we're done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Is there another vote to end debate on this POS legislation? So these 21 a$$hoes have to vote again on this?


22 posted on 04/11/2013 7:25:49 PM PDT by TMA62 (Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TMA62

Not sure if there’s a vote to end debate but they will vote on the bill itself. I don’t trust a single one of them to do the right thing. They’re scum.


23 posted on 04/11/2013 7:28:03 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama; cherry; rarestia; Arm_Bears; All

In 2009 and 2010, the Taxed Enough Already Party made good progress by rallying under the Gadsden Flag. I have been flying mine 24/7 since 1-20-2013.

Looks like I ‘ll be flying The Minuteman Flag underneath it from now to 11-2014.


24 posted on 04/11/2013 7:28:42 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Sadly, it appears the Taxed Enough Already Party has gone missing.


25 posted on 04/11/2013 7:36:38 PM PDT by Arm_Bears (Refuse; Resist; Rebel; Revolt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Tea Party groups must unite. Conservative radio talkers can help us since we see many networks are the arm of the democratic party. The next primary should be a political blood bath. We need to do whatever it takes, to get rid of these people. Anyone out there who has a good background and you respect the constitution, begin a campaign, or if you know of a solid leader, encourage them to run. We have to get rid of these current turncoats because they are the problem. The speaker is our enemy; just no other way to say it because he’s not trustworthy.


26 posted on 04/11/2013 7:36:40 PM PDT by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks 2nd amendment mama.
mong those voting to defeat the filibuster were 9 Democrats with “A” ratings from the National Rifle Association, and 12 A-rated Republicans (out of 16 Republican “ayes”). Two Democrats, Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) and Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK), joined the majority of Republican Senators who tried to prevent debate, much less a vote, on the bill.

27 posted on 04/11/2013 7:42:11 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

28 posted on 04/11/2013 7:43:54 PM PDT by NoLibZone (None here can be puzzled by why Jews walked into the cars so quietly- we are walking up the planks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

You’ll have your hands full, SC voters are so uninformed that they think Graham and McPain are “conservatives”. They will nevcer figure it out.


29 posted on 04/11/2013 7:44:49 PM PDT by Theodore R. ("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

The poor Republican lawmaker selection is the result of uninformed, even grossly ignorant, Republican primary voters, which some “independents” sprinkled in too.


30 posted on 04/11/2013 7:46:25 PM PDT by Theodore R. ("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EdReform

bookmark


31 posted on 04/11/2013 7:47:04 PM PDT by EdReform (Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

I would like to know what actions the NRA is taking. We hear almost nothing from them.
Did they challenge these senators? Did they warn them that the NRA will not support their campaigns and actively support their opponents?
Do they realize they can lose that surge in membership (and then some) if they do not stand up and support their membership’s interests?
What action has the NRA taken against the laws passed in NY, Conneticut, and Colorado? What support have they solicited from their supporters and politicians?
What have they done to encourage manufacturers to move out of these states?

HAVE THEY DONE ANYTHING?


32 posted on 04/11/2013 7:47:06 PM PDT by jim-x (9/11/2001 - Never forget, Never forgive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Like college faculty, the NRA has been “inflating grades” for years. It’s the failure of hope over reality.


33 posted on 04/11/2013 7:47:34 PM PDT by Theodore R. ("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

“What will the NRA rate the “sorry 21” after this vote?”

That’s what we have to watch. I just do not trust some of the NRA board members, like Grover Norquist. We’ve lost nearly all our ‘conservative’ groups to the dark side. I hope the NRA doesn’t follow suit.


34 posted on 04/11/2013 7:49:09 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

The Tea Party is now a victims association.

Whine whine whine 24/7.


35 posted on 04/11/2013 7:49:43 PM PDT by NoLibZone (None here can be puzzled by why Jews walked into the cars so quietly- we are walking up the planks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

Does a bear... I’d include a graphic representation for clarity but HTML is not my forte.


36 posted on 04/11/2013 7:49:46 PM PDT by chulaivn66 (Semper Fidelis in Extremis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

but how many talk radio pundits actually really get involved and tell their listeners to make calls etc?
Not many because most care about their own pockets and power and job.

I’ve just given up on most talk radio like Hannity, Rush , Levin and Savage are still for me as is Laura but the rest ARF


37 posted on 04/11/2013 7:50:25 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South
21 traitors to the Constitution.

Graham:

 photo tumblr_m1mkc9eMRT1qbimch_zps18cd6515.gif

and Cain

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

38 posted on 04/11/2013 7:56:29 PM PDT by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

39 posted on 04/11/2013 7:57:12 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTHomes

What a lovely list of BS. I assume the feds will insist that local law enforcement ENFORCE this FEDERAL mandate....you know like they insist that local law enforcement ENFORCE federal immigration law....oops! ....nevermind.


40 posted on 04/11/2013 8:00:29 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Got a RNC Voter Verification form from Reince Priebus today. It said they needed a contribution to help defeat the Obama agenda. I sent them $0 and a note asking why the hell are Senate Republicans voting against a filibuster of the Gun registration bill. I answered the question by saying they were a bunch of LOSERS.


41 posted on 04/11/2013 8:13:26 PM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: Katiana Kalashnikova

What’s to freaking support, The destruction of the Constitution?

You’re on the wrong site. That would be Salon or Demon rat Underground. Perhaps the Brady Center...


43 posted on 04/11/2013 8:28:52 PM PDT by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JTHomes

That’s definately bad but the worste part of the bill is the mental health evaluation requirements- This doesn’t mean that a perosn will undergo a mental health evaluation in person if they own a gun- this means, just like in ny- that someoen will sequester a person’s medical records, OR a nurse or doctor will INFORM the govenrment that a patient of theirs in or was on anti-anxiety, anit-depressents, - anti-psychotic druigs at soem point in their lives, and the police will be forced to go and confiscate guns fro mthat person WITHOUT DUE PROCESS and WITHOUT AN ACTUAL DIAGNOSIS that shows the person is actually dangerous to society- just takign hte meds now is enough to have you deemd unfit to own guns- It’s already happenign in NY and it WILL happen all over the ocutnry as these frigging traitorous republicans ‘compromise’ with the left and violte our constitutinal rights


44 posted on 04/11/2013 8:30:11 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

[[What will the NRA rate the “sorry 21” after this vote?]]

Mmmmp- a ‘bad rating’ wil lreally teach htem how seriosu aqbout preventign violations to the second amendfment the NRA is- Hopefulyl they will also ... eeeeek... give htem the stink eye too- That’ll show em


45 posted on 04/11/2013 8:31:23 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

[[So will it pass the Senate and does it have a chance in the House?]]

We just had 21 republicans vote for ‘debatign the issue’ - of course it will pass the house- if that many turned traitor so easily now, it just goes to show that they will do so when it actually counts too-

NO WAY IN HELL shoudl they be even discussing this vote- they shoudl have sent a clear message “Not on my watch” to the left- and they shoudl have been loudly proclaimign right alogn that there is no way they are goign to vote for a violation of hte second amendment- but isntead we have them ‘agreeign to vote’? This ocuntry has lost it’s moral way-


46 posted on 04/11/2013 8:35:49 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

[[The next primary should be a political....]]

how can it be? America spoke loud and clear when they handily and agreeably reelected the worste president EVER for a secondf term- thjey spoke loud and clear that they woudl rather lose their constitutional rights all for the sake of ‘freebies’ promissed by the govenrment than to do the right thing and vote out hte party who is hell bent on destroyign htis once great nation of ours-

I will be compeltely shocjked IF America actualyl does thwe right thing and kicks these traitors and socialists out of office-


47 posted on 04/11/2013 8:39:26 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Ping for place holder!


48 posted on 04/11/2013 8:41:58 PM PDT by basil (basil, 2ASisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTHomes
Unbelieveable! In other words, it is nearly impossible to even travel to another state for hunting purposes (deer, elk, pheasants, etc) without actually breaking the law when traveling for you & your firearms & ammo to the other state.
49 posted on 04/11/2013 8:46:19 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

time for the NRA to change their ratings system


50 posted on 04/11/2013 8:49:22 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson