Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnnGora

Sounded like he was equating yesterday’s jump-on-the-bandwagon reporting with Beck’s story and refusing to touch it. I.e. yesterday’s stories were false and Rush is not going to fall for it again by reporting Beck’s information.

Hope this makes sense.


50 posted on 04/18/2013 9:29:10 AM PDT by MustKnowHistory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


OK, now he is addressing this story (Saudi national). (Sort of)


51 posted on 04/18/2013 9:36:16 AM PDT by zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: MustKnowHistory

Sounds like Limbaugh will cover the Saudi story.


52 posted on 04/18/2013 9:37:04 AM PDT by MustKnowHistory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: MustKnowHistory; AnnGora

Ok...he’s passive/aggressive on the Saudi “not so interesting anymore” person. The openning now makes some sense...still...keep discussing it Rush. The story HAS to get around!


54 posted on 04/18/2013 9:39:36 AM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom ( Mourning in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson