Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maher to Guest Defending Islam in Wake of Boston Bombings: 'That's Liberal ####'
NewsBusters.org ^ | April 20, 2013 | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 04/20/2013 11:10:43 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: Kaslin

I think the great majority of card-carrying libs and leftist know that Islam is the biggest threat in the world. But they’re just so conditioned to hating conservative Christians most of them cannot bring themselves to speak the obvious.


41 posted on 04/20/2013 12:08:45 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’d not be surprised to see more peoples eyes opened. I’m sure that there were more than a few libtards caught off guard by his statements. Maybe they’ll start seeing the bullsh!t.


42 posted on 04/20/2013 12:09:39 PM PDT by tje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CityCenter

I’m sorry

I know your intentions are good

I’ve just never been nor will ever be that level a Christian

You ever see The Mission

I’m more DeNiro than Irons


43 posted on 04/20/2013 12:18:39 PM PDT by wardaddy (wanna know how my kin felt during Reconstruction in Mississippi, you fixin to find out firsthand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Is there hope for Bill Maher?

No...he just recognizes their are certain truths that are indisputable

After all, he may be a liberal, but he isn't a idiot...

44 posted on 04/20/2013 12:21:59 PM PDT by Popman (Godlessness is always the first step to the concentration camp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Don’t let him know you’re praying for him.... That will drive him right back to liberal doucheville.


45 posted on 04/20/2013 12:31:30 PM PDT by Bullish (May the time soon come when Obamunism is only spoken of in hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m torn. I hate Maher, but he’s correct somewhat here


46 posted on 04/20/2013 12:38:51 PM PDT by Cronos (Latin presbuteros->Late Latin presbyter->Old English pruos->Middle Engl prest->priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
The Al-Saud royal family came to power by cohabiting with Wahab -- an Islamic preacher who wanted to restore Islam to Mohammed's ways

The Turks of the 18th century and the Hashemites were too mild for him (they only persecuted Christians and Jews, they didn't slaughter them)

Saud and Wahabb made a pact to support each other

When the house of Saud got money in the 70s (thanks to our cars), they then splurged it on spreading Wahabiism to Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Iraq, Chechnya, Bosnia etc. etc.

47 posted on 04/20/2013 12:41:10 PM PDT by Cronos (Latin presbuteros->Late Latin presbyter->Old English pruos->Middle Engl prest->priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

With Mayer’s homosexual joke about MeCain & Graham & now calling B.S. on ‘all faiths do it’, the broke clock has been right twice now.


48 posted on 04/20/2013 12:42:59 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

And then to think we went to war in 1991 against Saddam to defend the “House of Saud”....what fools we were.


49 posted on 04/20/2013 12:44:07 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
Laughably silly. Please cite a source. [I have one, pretty much the official line from the Roman Church.]

Here is the relevant excerpt from Laux's Church History: "The total number of men and women, priests, monks, etc., who suffered death in England for the Catholic faith from 1535 to 1681 is over six hundred, several hundred of whom have been beatified." (p 454) Of course, Fr. John Laux's book is the Roman version of the story so it doesn't tell you that Bloody Mary, Henry's daughter who adhered to the Church of Rome, killed comparable numbers of Christians, usually burning them alive.

200,000? Seriously? Wow. The worst internecine slaughter of Christians during that period occurred in France, during the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre: The number of Huguenot's murdered is estimated to be between 5,000 and 30,000. Unlike the English persecutions, which were confined to specific cases, that particular bit of Roman treachery was a deliberate decapitation strike against the French Reformers, whose leaders had gathered to honor a royal wedding.

50 posted on 04/20/2013 12:46:33 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Which, sadly, Duane did not get to live to see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Never seen this before but I love it!


51 posted on 04/20/2013 12:47:19 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

It is you that should learn some history. I don’t think Maher was referring to the Crusades but to the mass slaughter between Catholics and Protestants not to mention the torture chambers operated by the church. Christians were killing Christians. Heretics and women were being burned alive in the name of Christ. People who thought the earth was round were killed! Modern Christians must disassociate themselves from the crimes of the Christians of the Middle Ages.


52 posted on 04/20/2013 12:48:37 PM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; irishtenor
I really badly want to curse about that

&&&@*&$*( Bush senior to *&@#)*$)#

Saddam was a mean, evil son of a .... but he was a secular, mean, evil, son of a ......

If we hadn't stuck our nose in (thank you Bush senior!) Saddam would right now have crushed Iran with Saudi and Qatari money and Al Qaeda would be crushed.

christians in Syria and Iraq would be safe and the Ayatollahs would be out of power in Iran and the Saudis would have to bow to Saddam

Why did we butt in?

Idiots, idiots, idiots

And the road to 9/11 starts in 1991. Osama used the "stationing of Infidel troops on the Holy Land of Saudi Arabia" as reason for 9/.11

53 posted on 04/20/2013 12:51:50 PM PDT by Cronos (Latin presbuteros->Late Latin presbyter->Old English pruos->Middle Engl prest->priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna; MrsEmmaPeel
let's trace the Huguenots, shall we. In france, under Francis I, France was tolerant of all religious views

however, what did the Huguenots do? In the affair of the placards they posted placards all over Paris and even on the bedchamber door of the king (a security breach that angered him and made him change his tolerance position) -- these placards were attacks on Catholics.

So, instead of discussing, the Huguenots went to attack the Catholic majority who until then were content to let them live and debate and discuss and debate. Incidently, until this time the Huguenots were increasing, like the Moslems in Bradford, but then they started to get shrill and wake people up with their attacks

This polemic was an attack and the Huguenots started this retaliation.This was in 1534

Next, came the French wars of religion in which the Huguenots conspired against the King. This, added to the previous attack meant that they now publically came to attack the conservative forces. The progressives of the Huguenots were the precursors of the Revolutionaires

The people who became Huguenots were primarily the urban elite, like our present-day New Yorkers who take a fad and they saw that this was a means to oppose the King, so Huguenotism became a political tool

A group of Huguenots tried to kidnap the Prince Francis II when his father died -- causing more antagonism.

Huguenots in 1560 attacked Catholic Churchs and destroyed properties in Rouen and La Rochelle -- thus the FIRST salvo was lobbed by the Huguenots. -- the Catholics retailiated with mobs at seeing their places of worship attacked and defiled by Huguenots

Next, in 1562-70, we have the wars -- now political-religious, so no, it was not a simple case of "persecution" --> The Huguenots were one side of a civil war, which they lost

Now, let's come to the juicy part, the St. Bart's day massacre -- this occured in 1572, 40 years after the first provocations by the Huguenots and 12 years after they started destroying Catholic Churchs (just like the Moslems in America they were quiet until their numbers grew)

now, King Charles XI was openly in favor of the Huguenots -- so a political moment. Hence the attacks on the opposing side

So, let's see in conclusion -- Huguenots first start their provocations in 1534, then in 1560 start attacking Catholic Churchs (with no provocation), then start their political support against the conservatives and start a civil war. After 12 years their side loses the civil war and yet they are still allowed to live and practise their faith (note this is the 1500s, not a nice time, yet they get this tolerance) -- but they still play political intrigues. So, one faction starts to attack and massacre the other faction

so, stop the entire "poor persecuted Huguenots" -- they brought it on themselves.

54 posted on 04/20/2013 12:53:31 PM PDT by Cronos (Latin presbuteros->Late Latin presbyter->Old English pruos->Middle Engl prest->priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna; MrsEmmaPeel

And lets see more about these Huguenots. They went to South Africa to set up the apartheid system, they went to Prussia to form the beginnings of the Prussian system which directly led to Naziism...


55 posted on 04/20/2013 12:55:46 PM PDT by Cronos (Latin presbuteros->Late Latin presbyter->Old English pruos->Middle Engl prest->priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A cogent moment. I’ll give him that. Nothing more.


56 posted on 04/20/2013 12:56:56 PM PDT by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

You are such a tool. So far the muzzies have killed but a mere fraction of what Middle Ages Christians did. Don’t forget there are no statistics for the number of deaths in the Christian torture chambers. I’m not proud of the Church’s past but you can’t just ignore it. Men really are sinners and we are just as bad as the muzzies. Don’t cast stones!


57 posted on 04/20/2013 1:02:07 PM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

So what’s your point? Christians were fighting Christians. End of story. Sad


58 posted on 04/20/2013 1:04:50 PM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: bjc

They can’t do that and remain faithful to Islam. It is a cult of conquest.


59 posted on 04/20/2013 1:06:37 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Every penny given to film and TV media companies goes right into enemy coffers. Starve them out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

“LEVIN: Well, I guess I have a girl for you, Pam Geller you could maybe meet.“

How many people has Pam Geller killed?


60 posted on 04/20/2013 1:10:57 PM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson