Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/21/2013 6:42:25 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Cops do not practice on a weekly basis. Cops are hardly shooting professionals.


2 posted on 04/21/2013 6:43:54 AM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Firing hundreds of rounds with a 90% miss rate is standard for cops.


3 posted on 04/21/2013 6:46:08 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind


4 posted on 04/21/2013 6:46:40 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Based on the kind of gear we see these SWAT Rambo’s carrying, I’d think they’ve got full auto capability, the most expensive EOTech sights, lasers, flashlights, grips and doodads etc. that money can buy.

I think they were just itching to butcher up a perp with their toys they’ve had to shoot paper and cardboard with all those times at the tac range.


5 posted on 04/21/2013 6:46:46 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Usually, one well placed before, after or between the misses. Kinda the way that works. Regardless of ballistics, human nature takes the cake.


8 posted on 04/21/2013 6:50:25 AM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

” cops, who are trained professionals, who practice on at least a weekly basis with their firearms”

Cops are trained but they are not professional gun slingers and they do not shoot weekly. Most only shoot once or twice a year, and even then only 50-100 rounds each time.


12 posted on 04/21/2013 6:53:22 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s not the Bill Of Needs.


15 posted on 04/21/2013 6:55:47 AM PDT by real saxophonist (If something is TRULY 'common sense', then a law about it is unneccesary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
And How Many Bullets Do You Need?

I would say you should have at least one bullet (round for “Buffalo Head” ) at the end of a firefight. How many rounds you need would depend on location, number of purps, how good of a shot you are and several other factors. There is no way to give that a number. Also how many rounds and how often do you want to practice?

16 posted on 04/21/2013 6:55:48 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
>>> Yet our politicians .... are saying that the most anyone needs to have to protect himself from armed intruders is seven rounds in the magazine.

No, Jim, you are wrong.

Our politicians would rather we don't have any in the first place.

What happened in Boston is exactly what they had in mind. Citizens cowering in their own homes and Gov Alphabet Agencies/SWAT/light armored vehicles on our streets for our own protection.

17 posted on 04/21/2013 6:56:33 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
FTA Of course, it took trained police, who were not dealing with an unexpected attack, who were not roused from a peaceful slumber, who were not worried about their wives and kids, some 200 rounds to kill one dangerous man.

I read that the younger brother killed him whe he ran over and dragged him.

18 posted on 04/21/2013 6:57:54 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Gov Coomo is right. “You don't need ten bullets to kill a deeeer”.

You might need 200 bullets to kill a terrorist.

19 posted on 04/21/2013 6:57:58 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
And How Many Bullets Do You Need?

As many as I have cases, primers and powder for. A bullet is only slingshot fodder without the other components of a cartridge.

Stupid, know-nothing columnists (not you S and F)...learn something about guns!

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

20 posted on 04/21/2013 6:58:41 AM PDT by wku man (We are the 53%! www.7161.com/streamer.cfm?dt_track_id=21356)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I need as many bullets as I have cases, primers, and powder.


21 posted on 04/21/2013 6:58:59 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
And How Many Bullets Do You Need?

At least as many as the empty brass I have?

What did I win?

24 posted on 04/21/2013 7:02:41 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The question to be asked about the firefight: what was the capacity of their magazines?


26 posted on 04/21/2013 7:04:49 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
"200 rounds to kill one dangerous man."

I thought his Muzzie Bro' killed him by running over him with the stolen SUV.

29 posted on 04/21/2013 7:06:45 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

A police spokesmen said on TV that the police had to pull back from one of the Watertown engagements because they ran out of ammunition.

Too bad Homeland Security has hogged it all up.


31 posted on 04/21/2013 7:16:02 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Welcome to Obama-Land - EVERYTHING NOT FORBIDDEN IS COMPULSORY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
some 200 rounds to kill one dangerous man.

Except they didn't kill him. His brother ran over him with a deadly assault weapon (aka SUV) and it ripped open his ribcage and lungs.

32 posted on 04/21/2013 7:19:13 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s probaly worth mentioning that FBI crime statistics show that single victim- multiple perpetrator homicides are on the eise. IOW, it is becoming increasingly likely that you will be defending your life against more than one assailent? I had 5 in the cylinder when three perps tried to rob me. Believe me when I tell you, when you’re in that situation you want a large caliber weapon that holds more ammo than you need. 13-15 rounds is about right IMO. 30 is better yet.


35 posted on 04/21/2013 7:23:10 AM PDT by RC one (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I agree with others, it’s time the police set an example and kept to 7 bullets also...maybe back to revolvers.

After all, 6 shots with a decent-sized revolver will kill anyone for sure, if placed correctly.


36 posted on 04/21/2013 7:29:20 AM PDT by BobL (Look up "CSCOPE" if you want to see something really scary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson