Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul: Drones would have been OK in Boston manhunt
Hot Air ^ | 4-23-2013 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 04/23/2013 9:54:24 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot

An important clarification from Senator Rand Paul, who made headlines for a rare talking filibuster challenging Barack Obama to explain the difference between using drones against American citizens overseas and using them in the United States. Neil Cavuto asked Paul about the distinction yesterday in light of the manhunt for American citizen Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on Friday, in which a drone or two with real-time infrared downlook capabilities above Watertown might have saved a little time. Paul told Cavuto that this wasn’t the use to which he objected:

“If there’s a killer on the loose in a neighborhood, I’m not against drones being used to search them out, heat-seeking devices being used, I’m all for law enforcement,” Paul said on Fox Business Network’s Cavuto last night. “I’m just not for surveillance when there’s no probable cause that a crime’s being committed.”

“Here’s the distinction, Neil, I’ve never argued against any technology being used when you have an imminent threat, active crime going on,” he added.

Actually, I thought that distinction was pretty clear all along. The police have used helicopters for decades to track suspects on the run from law enforcement, and haven’t been shy about using the latest surveillance technology in the air or on the ground. Case law has long allowed that kind of aerial surveillance, especially for open areas outside of houses, even in back yards. The only difference is in the aerial platform and whether a pilot is along for the ride.

The question Paul wanted answered was not about surveillance but about offensive operations ......

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 113th; citizen; counterterrorism; domestic; drones; randpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Salamander

The aliens have been waiting for that. We’re never gonna see ‘em comin’ at this rate! ;^)


41 posted on 04/23/2013 11:09:08 AM PDT by TigersEye (If babies had guns they wouldn't be aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

/facepalm

LOL


“I have a question for Hagerstown residents. Did anyone see unidentified flying objects on Saturday, April 13? That night, I, and five confirmed others at separate locations, saw triangles over the north side of the city, while looking for the Northern Lights. Electronics were even affected at two other known locations from these things. Were drones around?”
— Hagerstown”

I’ve seen the ‘triangles’ myself.
I figured it was our guys in some new tech-gizmo and waved at them.

Salamander The Unflappable Pragmatic

[I more curious as to why they were looking for the northen lights *here*]


42 posted on 04/23/2013 11:15:21 AM PDT by Salamander (Like acid and oil on a madman's face, reason tends to fly away.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“Probably a crime being committed somewhere in this neighborhood. Lets buzz this street again just to make sure. “


43 posted on 04/23/2013 11:15:47 AM PDT by Casie (democrats destroy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

Afghanistan, LOL.

I was only making the point that restrictions on the civilian ownership of any weapon goes against the true spirit of the 2nd Amendment, which aims for civilians to outmatch the power of the government.


44 posted on 04/23/2013 11:17:56 AM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Casie

Clearly not what Rand Paul meant. What’s the difference between a helicopter doing surveillance of an active chase and a drone?


45 posted on 04/23/2013 11:18:15 AM PDT by TigersEye (If babies had guns they wouldn't be aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

The newsies were telling people the Northern Lights might be visible further south than usual a week or so ago. My friend in south Jersey heard it and was hoping to see them too. Never did.


46 posted on 04/23/2013 11:20:54 AM PDT by TigersEye (If babies had guns they wouldn't be aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

It boils down to, do we have just cause to trust government to do what they say they are going to do?


47 posted on 04/23/2013 11:20:59 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

No. So, do we shut down all gooberment activity (because I don’t trust them on anything) and if ‘yes’ how do we do that?


48 posted on 04/23/2013 11:22:34 AM PDT by TigersEye (If babies had guns they wouldn't be aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
Am I the only one who saw the FLIR system being used with automated targeting systems being fired?
It's all over the news, but I guess people have no idea what they're watching.

The Technology "was" used in Boston, but because it was connected
to a helicopter it's ok I guess.

49 posted on 04/23/2013 11:23:49 AM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I don't have any answer.

I am questioning Sen Paul. From what he said, he can not guarantee government won't use surveillance drones when there’s no probable cause that a crime’s being committed.

50 posted on 04/23/2013 11:29:52 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Ah, I see.

Can’t imagine how they’d see them this much farther south and in the mountains but I reckon it could happen.

My grandmother saw them when she was a kid but we’re talking 90 years ago.


51 posted on 04/23/2013 11:30:22 AM PDT by Salamander (Like acid and oil on a madman's face, reason tends to fly away.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
Can any gov official guarantee that any gov employee won't abuse whatever authority or opportunities their job presents them? Cops in helicopters could start randomly shooting at people and things on the ground just for kicks.
52 posted on 04/23/2013 11:36:16 AM PDT by TigersEye (If babies had guns they wouldn't be aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Exactly my question, why the slippery slope?
53 posted on 04/23/2013 11:40:47 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

What slippery slope?


54 posted on 04/23/2013 11:42:52 AM PDT by TigersEye (If babies had guns they wouldn't be aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Noamie
Hell yes, agreed. All there was in Boston was 100's of police officers
dressed up like GIJoe and playing for the cameras in their Military armored vehicles.
If they have the equipment they must use it, right?


The first sign of real trouble and those candy asses would be on the hotline
to the National Guard.

55 posted on 04/23/2013 11:49:59 AM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
Here is what Paul said, (watch video clip here 6:56 in length). Watch the whole exchange.

(Transcipt) PAUL: "Here’s the distinction, Neil. I’ve never argued against any technology being used when you have an imminent threat, an active crime going on. If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash, I don’t care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him. But it’s different if they want to fly over your hot tub or your yard just because they want to do surveillance on everyone and they want to watch your activities."

What Ed at Hot Air showed is 1:49 long. Cut off just before my emphasis in Paul's response. WHY?

56 posted on 04/23/2013 1:26:39 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I’m just noting how very very easy it would be to slip down that slope. :p


57 posted on 04/23/2013 2:43:41 PM PDT by Casie (democrats destroy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

On that point we would agree. Honestly, we should be able to easily procure selective fire weapons if we chose to do so without government restriction.


58 posted on 04/23/2013 3:36:33 PM PDT by jurroppi1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Casie

Authority always carries with it the potential for abuse. The question is are policies going to be set that are abusive from the start? I don’t see Rand implying that at all.


59 posted on 04/23/2013 3:59:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (If babies had guns they wouldn't be aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"The question is are policies going to be set that are abusive from the start?"

Nah. I'm not interested in the original intentions of bad policy. And I may not be the only one.

From Drudge- Ron Paul fans furious over Rand's drone stand..., How Rand learned to love the drone.

I like Rand to and all, but he's wrong on the drones and I'm growing weary of well meaning republicans opening doors for psychopath liberals. Its ok to just say no. But like girls with low self esteem at prom, republicans keep saying dumb junk like, "Ok. Under the dress. But over the bra." :p

60 posted on 04/23/2013 6:24:26 PM PDT by Casie (democrats destroy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson