Skip to comments.ARE SAUDIS SOFTENING IMAGE OF TERRORISTS?
Posted on 04/23/2013 10:40:15 AM PDT by cradle of freedom
Listening to Rush replaying many sound bites of the media describing the Boston terrorist as a *kid*, a student, a typical American kid who is maybe *troubled* it is becoming very clear that the msm is weaving its golden spider web of deceit over what happened at the Boston Marathon. In only a few short days they have decided that the bomber is going to be given the full Trayvon treatment. Why are they so sympathetic to this guy? Could it be that the Saudis are making phone calls to all of their buddy media owners? Are the Saudis, whether they had anything to do with the attack or not, trying to turn the public perception of terrorism toward something that is not connected to Islam? Are the Saudis trying to redefine terrorism as something else? Like Columbine or Sandy Hook.
The Saudis have had fifty years to ingratiate themselves to the richest and most powerful and influencial in the world. They know how to work the charm offensive and they have lots and lots of very charming money. They have business dealings with many American and international business people, they have friendships and business dealings with many top American political leaders. Their financial interests are deeply entangled with the finanical interests of all of these people.
The media is starting to act like protective mama bears to the terrorists. I think this is much more than the usual liberal idiocy. I think that the message is coming down from on high--msm central command to change the narrative away from cold blooded Islamic terrorists to these young confused victims who desserve our sympathy. Nothing to do with Islamic extremism--move along now.
The MSM has their job cut out for them. But their constant, incessant voice in the background in offices and waiting rooms will have its impact. Pretty soon, many people will doubt the attack even took place. In 10 years, no one will remember. We need to do something to keep the memory alive for our own safety.
This is absolutely typical liberal bleeding heart stuff IMO.
No need for the Saudis to fund it.
Have you heard about the Saudi guy who supposedly has been taken back to Saudi Arabia? The 9/11 terrorist attack had financing by some of the Saudi princes. Prince Bandahar’s wife donated to a *charity* that funded the 9/11 attack and another prince also gave money to the terrorists.
The Saudi are our *frenemies*, they are false friends who make lots of money off us but are quietly working to destroy us and our way of life.
Just remember—if these guys were rednecks, the MSM would be eating them for breakfast. But since they’re muslim, the narrative will be all about how evil America drove nice islamic kids to commit a horrible atrocity.
BREAKING: Bomb Suspect #2 had Skittles, Iced Tea in hands when shot
The largest non Murdoch holder of FOX news stock is Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal. And they own half the Congress, and have that whole Grover Norquist thing too.
They can indeed steer the narrative. Saudi Arabia DRIVES islamic fundamenatlism but are never blamed. Egypt, Syria, Libya, Chechnya, and Al Qeida are all covered in Saudi cash.
That’s how I think of him: a *kid*, a student, a typical American kid who is maybe a sadistic mass murderer, little brother of a (fortunately dead) murderous wife beating sadist.
Yes, I’ve heard all about the Saudi guy. I don’t think the press needs any central command though. They do more to design the narrative than anyone else IMO. They know exactly what they want to do and how to accomplish it already.
Alwaleed also has had or still invested well in PayPal..HP...Citigroup...E-Bay...MCDonalds...AT&T...Amazon.com....American Express..Coca Cola...and with Bill gates Four Seasons Hotels...not to mention he and Buffit remain in contact.
Just a few of his investments.
After thinking about it some more, command central could have been either the White House or the Saudis.
But none of them want to be associated with the Boy Scouts because they are *extreme* because they do not accept homosexuals.
Saudi Wahabi Muslims—okay, but Christian conservatives—too extreme.
That is just one Saudi prince—there are HUNDREDS of them.
Thanks to Robert Spencer, Daniel Pipes, Pamela Geller, and Brigette Gabrial, etc, the TRUTH is getting out, even if at one person at a time.
Young Charlie never could seem to get a break either.
He wasn't even the one who actually killed Sharon Tate.
....”there are HUNDREDS of them”....
Yep, keeping it all in THE FAMILY....reminds me of the Costanostra.....problem is we don’t identify nor go after the bad guys anymore...they’re in charge!
But they all have to get their stories straight so they have to communicate and coordinate their stories. Remember when Rush plays sound bites from the msm and they all use the same verbage? This is not coincidental, this is coordinated. Organized crime has to get their stories straight and so do organized propagandists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.