“By a crooked progressivist court.”
Ah. I see. So we’ve moved on from, “the Constitution doesn’t say this, to, “the courts got it wrong”. If you want to change the constitution to read what you want it to say, there’s always the Amending formula. Good luck with that, btw.
What you "see is an opportunity to misconstrue.
So weve moved on from, the Constitution doesnt say this, to, the courts got it wrong. If you want to change the constitution to read what you want it to say, theres always the Amending formula. Good luck with that, btw.
I haven't moved anywhere. You've tried three different "synonyms" for "subject" and I didn't bite. It has a very specific legal meaning, but then, given that you apparently prefer a "living Constitution," I'm not surprised at your pathetic stand on a set of opinions you clearly haven't read. BTW, the dissenting opinion was written by Chief Justice Fuller.