Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie

“By a crooked progressivist court.”

Ah. I see. So we’ve moved on from, “the Constitution doesn’t say this, to, “the courts got it wrong”. If you want to change the constitution to read what you want it to say, there’s always the Amending formula. Good luck with that, btw.


38 posted on 04/24/2013 5:44:07 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge
Ah. I see.

What you "see is an opportunity to misconstrue.

So we’ve moved on from, “the Constitution doesn’t say this, to, “the courts got it wrong”. If you want to change the constitution to read what you want it to say, there’s always the Amending formula. Good luck with that, btw.

I haven't moved anywhere. You've tried three different "synonyms" for "subject" and I didn't bite. It has a very specific legal meaning, but then, given that you apparently prefer a "living Constitution," I'm not surprised at your pathetic stand on a set of opinions you clearly haven't read. BTW, the dissenting opinion was written by Chief Justice Fuller.

41 posted on 04/24/2013 5:51:42 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (An economy is not a zero-sum game, but politics usually is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson