Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As Bush Stays Silent, His Reputation Steadily Gains
Townhall.com ^ | April 25, 2013 | Michael Barone

Posted on 04/25/2013 5:06:30 AM PDT by Kaslin

Tomorrow, the George W. Bush Presidential Center will be dedicated at Southern Methodist University in Texas. It's a good time to look back on the performance of the 43rd president, who has been almost entirely missing from the public stage these past four years.

It's widely assumed that Bush is generally despised by the public. The perceptive American Interest blogger Walter Russell Mead stirred the ire of some former Bush aides when he recommended that Republicans avoid any defense of his record and move on to new issues.

But perhaps Bush's name is not mud any more. The Washington Post/ABC poll asked respondents to rate Bush's performance for the first time since December 2008, when only 33 percent rated it positively and 66 percent rated it negatively.

What the pollster found is that today 47 percent approve and 50 percent disapprove of Bush's performance. That approval number is precisely the same as Barack Obama's in the most recent Post/ABC poll.

Clearly many Americans have been reconsidering their verdict on George W. Bush. Many have come to think better of him than they did in the last four months of his tenure, when we were facing a financial crisis and sharp economic downturn.

Barack Obama will be at the Bush Center dedication and will presumably refrain from his usual carping about his predecessor, adopting for the moment the protocol followed by every other president in the last six decades.

The three other living former presidents will also be there -- Bill Clinton, who has enjoyed high ratings ever since leaving office, and Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush, who were defeated for re-election.

Their presence will be a reminder that with the passage of time we can appreciate presidents' genuine achievements and glide over their deficiencies and mistakes.

Republicans can appreciate that Carter provided leadership in transportation deregulation, which has strengthened our economy ever since, and brokered a peace between Egypt and Israel that even the current Muslim Brotherhood government has refrained from renouncing.

Democrats can appreciate that George Bush 41 provided deft guidance at the end of the Cold War, triumphed in the Gulf War and pressed successfully for the Americans With Disabilities Act.

It's an interesting coincidence that both these pairs of presidents were born in the same year -- Carter and Bush 41 in 1924, Clinton and Bush 43 in 1946, generally considered the first year of the postwar baby boom.

These two baby boom presidents illustrate how much individual character can shape presidential performance.

Clinton is one of those politicians who wanted to be president since he was a little boy. As a student and a candidate, he never seemed to prepare much but showed time and again that he could improvise and get himself out of trouble of his own making.

His brilliant political instincts were matched by an almost compulsive interest in the details of public policy. His major misfire came when he left the drafting of his health care program to others.

George W. Bush does not seem to have always wanted to be president. I think he believed that God had put it in his way, and he did his best to prepare himself for it.

Clinton was chronically late, while Bush characteristically showed up ahead of time. Clinton would keep rewriting his State of the Union speeches as he rode to the Capitol. Bush liked to have his big speeches prepared days in advance.

Clinton's indiscipline caused him problems, but he managed to surmount them. Bush's tendency to regard decisions as settled could cause problems, too. In retrospect, he should have revisited military strategy in Iraq sooner than in late 2006 and early 2007, when he put in place the successful surge.

Iraq and the financial crisis obscured Bush's successful initiatives -- the tax cuts, the bipartisan education accountability law, the Medicare prescription drug program, the PEPFAR program to curb AIDS in Africa.

They were the product of deliberate effort and careful preparation -- and some shrewd political calculation.

The Post/ABC poll suggests that Americans have been developing a more well-rounded assessment of Bush's stewardship, even as he has remained mostly silent in public.

Some presidents' reputations rise as they move into history. Harry Truman, reviled when he left office, was recognized later for getting the big decisions right despite some obvious mistakes.

The same thing seems to be happening, more quickly, with George W. Bush.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: georgewbush; potus; presidentialcenter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

1 posted on 04/25/2013 5:06:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There is no comparison between Bush and the current imposter. Bush is a good person, a man of principle and believer in God. But a liberal.
We are stuck with a communist, marxist, sympathizer for the middle eastern death cult unprincipled lying America-hating narcissist pos.


2 posted on 04/25/2013 5:12:26 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Pi$$ed off yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I for one like him


3 posted on 04/25/2013 5:17:34 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No surprise. obama even makes Carter’s record look good.


4 posted on 04/25/2013 5:20:24 AM PDT by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Don’t hold back... It not healthy.


5 posted on 04/25/2013 5:21:43 AM PDT by WomBom ("I read Free Republic for the pictures")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Yes, GWB can’t help but rise in stature in comparison to the current pPresident. It’s worth noting, though, that five years of absolute silence would probably help Obama’s image, too.


6 posted on 04/25/2013 5:23:21 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
True, but the fact remains: Bush's handling of the bully pulpit - which is to say total abandonment of it - helped set the table for Obama. He let Rove run messaging, and Rove's messaging has been a disaster from the beginning, and ran right through what his Crossroads Group did this cycle:

All explained here in fact:


7 posted on 04/25/2013 5:27:04 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

He is and will always be my most favorite president of the 21st century


8 posted on 04/25/2013 5:33:35 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

I for one love him. He wasn’t perfect and I didn’t agree with everything he did, but he was and is a man of honor who loves this country. Polar opposites from what we have now.


9 posted on 04/25/2013 5:34:03 AM PDT by Clintons Are White Trash (If stupid ever reaches $150 a barrel then I want the drilling rights to Maxine Water's head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
five years of absolute silence would probably help Obama’s image, too.

Like that's ever going to happen!!
10 posted on 04/25/2013 5:35:49 AM PDT by Clintons Are White Trash (If stupid ever reaches $150 a barrel then I want the drilling rights to Maxine Water's head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
He is and will always be my most favorite president of the 21st century

Talk about damning by faint praise.

11 posted on 04/25/2013 5:38:53 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("AP" clearly stands for American Pravda. Our news media has become completely and proudly Soviet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

As do I. Very much. Fair or not, however, the unblinking eye of history, will come to judge him harshly. For it was he that created The Department of Homeland Security. A monstrous, bloated federal agency, that his successor wields as a bludgeon against the American people.


12 posted on 04/25/2013 5:44:35 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash

I agree, I for one liked him also. He had enormous respect for the Office of President which the currect President does not. He said that he was alway humble when he was in the Office of the President and the history of the office.

He loves his country and he loved and always respected his troops in which he was Commander in Chief. I’ve never forgotten that.

Mr. President George W Bush have a wonderful day today in the dedication of your Presidential library


13 posted on 04/25/2013 5:58:38 AM PDT by avalonmistmoon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash

Yep.


14 posted on 04/25/2013 5:59:42 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

George Bush killed terrorists. Dead.


15 posted on 04/25/2013 6:01:05 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

IBTF”MMY”

In before the first “miss me yet?”


16 posted on 04/25/2013 6:04:37 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
He is and will always be my most favorite president of the 21st century

"will always be"? Bush was clearly the best so far, but I'm bonnietylering over here, hoping for better times ahead.

17 posted on 04/25/2013 6:04:46 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Heck, how can it not gain, when he’s compared to Obama; Benedict Arnold would look pretty good compared to Obama.


18 posted on 04/25/2013 6:07:08 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Silence is golden...especially when one is prone to say stupid things.


19 posted on 04/25/2013 6:08:00 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash

You cannot beat class, and the Bush familoy wrote the booki.


20 posted on 04/25/2013 6:36:07 AM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash
Like that's ever going to happen!!

Oh, I know. But, one never knows what the future may bring.

21 posted on 04/25/2013 6:45:08 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

There is a German saying which goes like “Reden ist Silber, aber schweigen ist Gold.” Which means: Talk is silver, but silence is gold”


22 posted on 04/25/2013 6:57:11 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
Jay Leno was sort of even-handed last night in his monologue. He said the Obama library would be called the Blame George W. Bush Library.

But he also showed a photo of the entrance to the GWB library which said BUSH LIBERRY.

23 posted on 04/25/2013 6:58:51 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Yeah, but that arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave will always be the most despised “president” of all times to me.


24 posted on 04/25/2013 7:00:43 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
For a moneyed family, the Bushes are very classy. However, as another poster said before me, Bush set the stage for where we find ourselves today, through his reckless spending, the creation of the Dept. of Homeland Security, and his ridiculous picks for key figures of his administration, like Condolezza Rice. Her naive mishandling of the Middle East has made that area far worse for Israel and the rest of the world. How about Michael Chertoff, the second head of the Dept. of Homeland security, who refused to believe first-hand reports of the post-Katrina horrors in New Orleans because he hadn't received the information through his own chain of command? Who can forget he went on to become incredibly wealthy after founding the Chertoff Group, which made billions selling X-ray body scanners to be used by TSA in our airports. What about George W.’s initial pick for a Supreme Court vacancy, his old buddy Harriet Miers, who had no credentials whatsoever for that post, other than being close to the Bush family? That was the final straw for me, and showed me that Bush did not take his leadership position seriously, but instead wanted to use his position to reward his loyalists. Now George W. is pushing for his brother to run for president, so the Bush family dynasty can be further preserved. It's time for this family to retire from the political scene. They are too shallow for public leadership.
25 posted on 04/25/2013 7:06:06 AM PDT by binreadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I have always thought that time and history would be kind to President George W. Bush.


26 posted on 04/25/2013 7:16:33 AM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash
The reason why it is not going to happen, is because that arrogant pos can will not shut his trap and listen to what others have to say.

Here is a great piece that I found yesterday

George W. Bush is smarter than you

by Keith Hennessey, April 24, 2013

The new George W. Bush Presidential Center is being dedicated this week. This seems like a good time to bust a longstanding myth about our former President, my former boss.

I teach a class at Stanford Business School titled “Financial Crises in the U.S. and Europe.” During one class session while explaining the events of September 2008, I kept referring to the efforts of the threesome of Hank Paulson, Ben Bernanke, and Tim Geithner, who were joined at the hip in dealing with firm-specific problems as they arose.

One of my students asked “How involved was President Bush with what was going on?” I smiled and responded, “What you really mean is, ‘Was President Bush smart enough to understand what was going on,’ right?”

The class went dead silent. Everyone knew that this was the true meaning of the question. Kudos to that student for asking the hard question and for framing it so politely. I had stripped away that decorum and exposed the raw nerve.

I looked hard at the 60 MBA students and said “President Bush is smarter than almost every one of you.”

More silence.

I could tell they were waiting for me to break the tension, laugh, and admit I was joking.

I did not. A few shifted in their seats, then I launched into a longer answer. While it was a while ago, here is an amalgam of that answer and others I have given in similar contexts.

I am not kidding. You are quite an intelligent group. Don’t take it personally, but President Bush is smarter than almost every one of you. Were he a student here today, he would consistently get “HP” (High Pass) grades without having to work hard, and he’d get an “H” (High, the top grade) in any class where he wanted to put in the effort.

For more than six years it was my job to help educate President Bush about complex economic policy issues and to get decisions from him on impossibly hard policy choices. In meetings and in the briefing materials we gave him in advance we covered issues in far more depth than I have been discussing with you this quarter because we needed to do so for him to make decisions.

President Bush is extremely smart by any traditional standard. He’s highly analytical and was incredibly quick to be able to discern the core question he needed to answer. It was occasionally a little embarrassing when he would jump ahead of one of his Cabinet secretaries in a policy discussion and the advisor would struggle to catch up. He would sometimes force us to accelerate through policy presentations because he so quickly grasped what we were presenting.

I use words like briefing and presentation to describe our policy meetings with him, but those are inaccurate. Every meeting was a dialogue, and you had to be ready at all times to be grilled by him and to defend both your analysis and your recommendation. That was scary.

We treat Presidential speeches as if they are written by speechwriters, then handed to the President for delivery. If I could show you one experience from my time working for President Bush, it would be an editing session in the Oval with him and his speechwriters. You think that me cold-calling you is nerve-wracking? Try defending a sentence you inserted into a draft speech, with President Bush pouncing on the slightest weakness in your argument or your word choice.

In addition to his analytical speed, what most impressed me were his memory and his substantive breadth. We would sometimes have to brief him on an issue that we had last discussed with him weeks or even months before. He would remember small facts and arguments from the prior briefing and get impatient with us when we were rehashing things we had told him long ago.

And while my job involved juggling a lot of balls, I only had to worry about economic issues. In addition to all of those, at any given point in time he was making enormous decisions on Iraq and Afghanistan, on hunting al Qaeda and keeping America safe. He was making choices not just on taxes and spending and trade and energy and climate and health care and agriculture and Social Security and Medicare, but also on education and immigration, on crime and justice issues, on environmental policy and social policy and politics. Being able to handle such substantive breadth and depth, on such huge decisions, in parallel, requires not just enormous strength of character but tremendous intellectual power. President Bush has both.

On one particularly thorny policy issue on which his advisors had strong and deep disagreements, over the course of two weeks we (his senior advisors) held a series of three 90-minute meetings with the President. Shortly after the third meeting we asked for his OK to do a fourth. He said, “How about rather than doing another meeting on this, I instead tell you now what each person will say.” He then ran through half a dozen of his advisors by name and precisely detailed each one’s arguments and pointed out their flaws. (Needless to say there was no fourth meeting.)

Every prominent politician has a public caricature, one drawn initially by late-night comedy joke writers and shaped heavily by the press and one’s political opponents. The caricature of President Bush is that of a good ol’ boy from Texas who is principled and tough, but just not that bright.

That caricature was reinforced by several factors:

I assume that some who read this will react automatically with disbelief and sarcasm. They think they know that President Bush is unintelligent because, after all, everyone knows that. They will assume that I am wrong, or blinded by loyalty, or lying. They are certain that they are smarter than George Bush.

I ask you simply to consider the possibility that I’m right, that he is smarter than you.

If you can, find someone who has interacted directly with him outside the public spotlight. Ask that person about President Bush’s intellect. I am confident you will hear what I heard dozens of times from CEOs after they met with him: “Gosh, I had no idea he was that smart.”

At a minimum I hope you will test your own assumptions and thinking about our former President. I offer a few questions to help that process.

And finally, if you base your view of President Bush’s intellect on a public image and caricature shaped by late night comedians, op-ed writers, TV pundits, and Twitter, is that a smart thing for you to do?

27 posted on 04/25/2013 7:18:21 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

By all means, please ignore that he set the table for the shit sandwich dinner we’re forced to eat now. “Patriot” act, homeland security (which supplied the tanks and weapons for the boston swat teams), largest ever expansion of medicare, no child left behind. I could go on for quite awhile.

And of course keeping his mouth shut helps him. He can’t string together 3 sentances without sounding like a blithering idiot. But we have a new sock puppet to hate on. meet the new boss, same as the old boss...George W Obama.


28 posted on 04/25/2013 7:18:50 AM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ops33

As have I


29 posted on 04/25/2013 7:20:30 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
Orangedog Since Oct 27, 2001

view home page, enter name:

~ About ~ Links ~ Contact ~ In Forum ~ Mail To ~

Return
Orangedog hasn't created an about page.

nuff said

30 posted on 04/25/2013 7:25:05 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The reason that Bush's rep is on the rise is that the media is not attacking him day in and day out like they did for so many years. So with the daily lies from the media being diverted to protecting Obummer, the reality of Bush's real record becomes clear - for a difficult time he was pretty good.

Conversely, despite the dailu cover up for our current inept president, the reality that is a terrible president is obvious to many because its all around them.

31 posted on 04/25/2013 7:25:08 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

yeah, over the past 10 years I never was enough of an ego maniac to post an entire page about me, me, me(!). But don’t let me get in the way of your hero worship of Lyndon Baines Bush.


32 posted on 04/25/2013 7:35:39 AM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog; Kaslin

WTH Up! The entire Bush clan is comprised of failed leadership for a free people. They are the enemy of Individual Freedom and the Constitution. They have always been in favor of the NWO.


33 posted on 04/25/2013 7:49:35 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
He is and will always be my most favorite president of the 21st century

Mine too! I didn't agree with his stance on immigration but he didn't falter when we were attacked, and his love of God and country was evident every day. He and Laura had (have) a lot of class and grace.

34 posted on 04/25/2013 7:49:41 AM PDT by beachn4fun (Why are Hispanics being given special treatment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog

You could at least put your state flag up


35 posted on 04/25/2013 7:50:56 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Like I want advertise that I’m living in the land of fast food, college football cults and big assed soccer moms.


36 posted on 04/25/2013 8:00:38 AM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
It’s worth noting, though, that five years of absolute silence would probably help Obama’s image, too.

I'd settle for five minutes of silence.

37 posted on 04/25/2013 8:02:16 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (The Tea Party was the earthquake, and Chick Fil A the tsunami...100's of aftershocks to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
You cannot beat class, and the Bush familoy wrote the booki.

Tell that to Sarah Palin.

38 posted on 04/25/2013 8:03:12 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (The Tea Party was the earthquake, and Chick Fil A the tsunami...100's of aftershocks to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
Like I want advertise that I’m living in the land of fast food, college football cults and big assed soccer moms.

Alabama?

Texas soccer moms are hot...

39 posted on 04/25/2013 8:05:58 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (The Tea Party was the earthquake, and Chick Fil A the tsunami...100's of aftershocks to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
ETA: Orangedog...Tennessee?

Texas handle would be BurntOrangedog.

HS football is king here, especially in the Metroplex. Best place in the world for Friday Night Lights.

40 posted on 04/25/2013 8:09:15 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (The Tea Party was the earthquake, and Chick Fil A the tsunami...100's of aftershocks to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

Worse...Ohio. Soccer moms here usually come with an ass the size of a barcalounger. And they have a sense of entitlement that would make the stereotypical inner city welfare queen blush.


41 posted on 04/25/2013 8:19:46 AM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog

LOL!!! I wasn’t even close.


42 posted on 04/25/2013 8:22:42 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (The Tea Party was the earthquake, and Chick Fil A the tsunami...100's of aftershocks to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dead
George Bush killed terrorists. Dead.

Indeed. Some men talk tough, but GWB can actually walk the talk.

Who can forget this classic? George Bush scuffles with Chilean security guards:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PX3aaWlUmpc

43 posted on 04/25/2013 8:32:10 AM PDT by lonevoice (Today I broke my personal record for most consecutive days lived)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog

Coward


44 posted on 04/25/2013 8:53:27 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

You tell her. I haven’t seen her lately.


45 posted on 04/25/2013 8:58:38 AM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
IBTF”MMY”

In before the first “miss me yet?”

You rang?



46 posted on 04/25/2013 10:02:57 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Kaslin

Well, at least Kaslin’s favorite was not Bill Clinton who, having left office in January 2001 must be considered the first president of the twenty first century, even if you consider it as I do to have begun on January 1, 2001. I am rather dismayed to see how many Americans seem to think Slick was a really great president, to me the idea is absurd. I have heard it said that the best thing about Clinton is that he did not really do a lot, I think that is probably true.


47 posted on 04/25/2013 10:42:58 AM PDT by RipSawyer (I was born on Earth, what planet is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
I was always amazed at the hatred the left directed at this man. He was more of a Hubert Humphrey democrat than a conservative.

What he was NOT was the republican equivalent of the Kenyan Kommie.

48 posted on 04/25/2013 11:12:51 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

You got that right, but then I never voted for a democRat and never will. Compared though to that arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Clinton was better then that pos is. At least he negotiated with the Republicans, while the usurper thinks that everything must go his way


49 posted on 04/25/2013 1:44:29 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Class and more important, maturity.
Why should he speak up, engage in the mud fights of the day?
Who needs it?
Guy’s got it made in the shade, enjoying life.


50 posted on 04/25/2013 1:49:02 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson