Long but good.
posted on 04/26/2013 3:58:41 PM PDT
I read it once and I just didn’t “get” it.
I will probably have to read it a couple more times to figure out what he is trying to say.
posted on 04/26/2013 4:04:50 PM PDT
by Repeal The 17th
(We have met the enemy and he is us.)
Either enforce it or get rid of it. Selective enforcement is tyranny.
posted on 04/26/2013 4:10:09 PM PDT
To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends
posted on 04/26/2013 4:18:53 PM PDT
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
We have too many laws, many of them individually, are too easy to run afoul of and taken as a large quagmire of laws, it’s hard to stay in compliance. We need to remove most gun related laws and instead go after criminals comitting crimes against their fellow man.
posted on 04/26/2013 4:25:48 PM PDT
(2A can't survive dem majorities)
Totalitarian regimes have done this before, right before the slaughter.
If they want them, they’ll have one hell of a fight on their hands.
Trample on my Constitutional rights, and you will pay the price, and it will be payed with blood.
posted on 04/26/2013 4:44:02 PM PDT
(We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
We llve under the Rule of Laws.
posted on 04/26/2013 4:54:52 PM PDT
(Don't try to explain yourself to liberals; you're not the jackass-whisperer.)
that a deferential court has not stricken a particular type of law does not excuse Congress and the President from the task of making their own judgments about whether a particular bill is constitutional.
Are you listening, George W. Bush?
posted on 04/26/2013 6:07:01 PM PDT
by Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
There shouldn’t be ANY Federal gun laws. Period. The 2nd is clear, concise, and unambiguous.
posted on 04/27/2013 12:18:11 PM PDT
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson