Skip to comments.Military becomes wildlife defender
Posted on 04/27/2013 6:54:33 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
The Defense Department is working with environmental groups and local governments to create buffers around bases where development threatened to encroach on combat training.
Many of the nation's 440 military bases were established in what were once sparsely populated hinterlands where soldiers trained without complaints from neighbors about the roar of warplanes and the sound of gunfire and explosions.
Now, with urban sprawl pushing up against perimeter fences, the U.S. Department of Defense has quietly become a major protector of wilderness and ranch lands. Working with conservation organizations and local governments, its Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative has helped buy nearly $1 billion worth of land to create buffer zones around 64 military bases where development threatened to encroach on combat training.
The program has been a boon for conservation, creating more than 260,000 acres of new sanctuaries off limits to development in perpetuity for some of the rarest plants and animals on earth: the California red-legged frog, the Pacific pocket mouse, the Chorro creek bog thistle and, in North Carolina, rare longleaf pine habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
This will work out well.....
The US military is now working with environMENTAL groups. So in 5 years, is the military bombing business’s so they don’t destroy the environment. In today’s world with the current administration, who knows?
You got extra points if you actually caught one ...
This a reason why we must end the sequester NOW by passing new tax increases. If we dont stop this madness of cutting the military then innocent wildlife will die,
This is an emergency situation,. RAISE TAXES NOW BEFORE ITS TOO LATE!
Obama says its ‘fair’.
Thisss isss thuch a nithe thory
Metrosexual America. We do hugging, crying and apologies good.
It’s a good thing they din’t use gnomes or potheads on that thar training range..
Chipping away at private property rights one "buffer zone," one wildlife refuge, one endangered stink bug at a time.
Nah, I have it on good authority that gnomes wouldn't have been good training material at all; their little legs just wouldn't carry them fast enough on the straightaways, and they don't corner very well, either.
And the potheads ... well, at least as far as those that were in my unit back in the day, they were barely able to get out of their own way, much less a 45- to 50-mph APC.
lol .. ya got to jab ‘em in the rear with a bayonet
I went to the NTC 20 years ago. I remember being briefed about some rare flavor of desert turtle. We were supposed to go to heroic measures to avoid them.
In Germany we avoided the boars, but for our safety not theirs.
Wow.. we had a US army plot of land closeby, Camp Riley, lots of good deer and such hunting not sure how long it will take to lose that to the public but it will happen,, unless cooler heads prevail.
“a force for good”
“will obey the orders of those above me”
gay is cool and other assorted wierdnesses
In other words, they are trying to take other peoples private property rights. These buffers are nothing but takings. If they want a buffer, they need to put said buffer on their own designated property.
Your eye’s are open. Prepare for utter stupidity and gov manipulation’s
This is not new. Military preserves have been recognized for many years as having an abundance of land unused and untouched, and providing safe harbor for rare and endangered species. Not sure why LAT is making a big deal about it now—maybe because the military is buying additional real estate as buffers. If so, good for them.
In 1993 during training in the woods at Ft Bragg, we had to avoid marked areas designated for the protection of the Red Cockaded Woodpecker.
Lots of marked areas.
If you were following a compass heading, and it would take you near one of their trees, you had to go around the area.
They were, even back then, going to extraordinary lengths for that bird. Today, the effort is crazy.
That's a fairly amazing "color-coded" map...and I knew there were "takings" out west-ish, but this is a bit astonishing?!
I mean, how much land needs to be "protected", "preserved", "reclaimed" by the government?!
Or good for the environmentalists!
Please keep in mind the administration!
[[The Defense Department is working with environmental groups and local governments to create buffers around bases where development threatened to encroach on combat training.]]
You gotta be friggin kidding me? No wonder wars can’t be fogyuth effectively any longer- Everyone’s too damn afraid of violating some pacifist’s ‘ethics’ code-
[[Chipping away at private property rights one “buffer zone,” one wildlife refuge, one endangered stink bug at a time. ]]
Whiel the gun control bill was receivign all the attention- members of congress were votign on a measure of whether or not to allow a UN 800 page ‘land use’ plicy to be the law of the land here i nte US where the manual states that ‘environmentally sensitive areas are off limits to homes’ meanign that the govenrment gets to designate ‘environmentally sensitive’ areas, with hte eventual goal of confiscating private lands andm ovign peopel into living pens essentailly- much like public housing projects- The UN project is a massive attempt at confiscatign privately owned lands and makign that land off limits to citizens
It’s a UN proposal being ‘seriously considered’ ghere i nthe US- apparently we’re not a soverign nation anyl onger, and we’re o nthe verge of allowing hte UN to dictate our laws and land usages to us thansk to corrupt politicians
[[In other words, they are trying to take other peoples private property rights. These buffers are nothing but takings.]]
Thatr’s exactly what the UN ideology is all about- declaring ‘buffer zones’ (ie: Confiscatign land that doesn’t belogn to htem) and makign it off limits to civilians, with hte eventual goal of herding peopel into cramped housing projects- all under the guise of being ‘environmentally sensitive’
I’ve been around Ft Bragg, NC since 1974. I’ve seen the development over the years as housing developments pushed west along the southern boundary of FT Bragg and the southern and eastern portion of Simmons AAF.
And Yes, folks will buy a home in one of those subdivisions and then complain about the artillery fire or aircraft noise on post.
The majority of the lands for the “buffer area” were purchased and then donated by various conservation groups. One of the largest is scheduled to become a new State Park that stretches from Ft Bragg to the Cape Fear River.
Link to the new Park
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.