Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Skyrocketing inflation: Russia now charging NASA $70 million per seat to fly US astronauts
fox ^ | 4/30/13 | ap

Posted on 04/30/2013 6:31:11 PM PDT by Nachum

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. – NASA is paying $424 million more to Russia to get U.S. astronauts into space, and the agency's leader is blaming Congress for the extra expense.

NASA announced its latest contract with the Russian Space Agency on Tuesday. The $424 million represents flights to and from the International Space Station aboard Russian Soyuz spacecraft, as well as training, for six astronauts in 2016 and the first half of 2017.

That's $70.6 million per seat -- well above the previous price tag of about $65 million.

Russia currently provides the only means of getting people to and from the space station, and its ticket prices have soared with each new contract.

Several U.S. companies are working on rockets and spacecraft to launch Americans from U.S. soil. But that's still a few years away. The ability to launch crews into orbit from America ended with NASA's shuttle program in 2011. Even before the shuttles retired, the U.S. had been relying on Russia to transport long-term residents to the space station.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: astronauts; inflation; nasa; russia; soyuz; spacestation
Wow, good thing Obama killed our space shuttle.
1 posted on 04/30/2013 6:31:11 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 04/30/2013 6:31:35 PM PDT by Nachum (The Obama "List" at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The Russians are just being good capitalists.


3 posted on 04/30/2013 6:33:07 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

And 85 Mil. in sequester funds are (is?) bringing down the US economy?


4 posted on 04/30/2013 6:35:46 PM PDT by doc1019 (There is absolutely no difference between pro-choice and pro-abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I believe the space shuttle launches were actually costing us more


5 posted on 04/30/2013 6:36:35 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

SS was a waste anyway but NASA had to develop new ship before getting rid of it, sure.


6 posted on 04/30/2013 6:53:32 PM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It’ll keep going up. count on it. Why wouldn’t it? What choice do we have? Did you think the Russians were our friends? we bankrupted them! Now it’s their turn.


7 posted on 04/30/2013 6:57:34 PM PDT by jyro (French-like Democrats wave the white flag of surrender while we are winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Just wait till China wants all payments in gold or oil.

The fiat money isn’t going to work forever.


8 posted on 04/30/2013 7:00:47 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

70 million is not “significantly larger” than 65 million, when it comes to the huge costs of space flight.


9 posted on 04/30/2013 7:08:07 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The Russians could start charging us $100M and there wouldn’t be a damn thing we could do about it.

I think increasing from $65 to $70M is reasonable for a new contract...and it looks like they’re still pricing the seats in dollars, which is VERY RISKY for them.


10 posted on 04/30/2013 7:24:49 PM PDT by BobL (Look up "CSCOPE" if you want to see something really scary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The space shuttle would cost far more per year.


11 posted on 04/30/2013 7:26:10 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Let the Russians have the Space Station. It’s worthless, anyway.


12 posted on 04/30/2013 7:41:55 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

What was wrong with the space shuttle? It was more advanced than the Russian counterpart.


13 posted on 04/30/2013 7:43:07 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever ((Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
"Screw those commie bastards, and screw their little wussy space station."
14 posted on 04/30/2013 7:44:24 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever
"What was wrong with the space shuttle? It was more advanced than the Russian counterpart."

Too many people in the administration with an obama-level education or less.
15 posted on 04/30/2013 8:59:20 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Surprised the Russians aren’t charging 3 times that much.


16 posted on 04/30/2013 9:39:53 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Are the damn Muzzies feeling better about themselves yet?


17 posted on 04/30/2013 9:40:50 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I got expelled from the "fundamental transformation" indoctrination center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

“Surprised the Russians aren’t charging 3 times that much.”

Don’t give them ideas :(


18 posted on 04/30/2013 9:50:37 PM PDT by Nachum (The Obama "List" at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

>>What was wrong with the space shuttle? It was more advanced than the Russian counterpart.<<

Everything was wrong with SS. The entire conception is flawed. SS went into service only because it looks sexy - just like a sci&first spacecraft from Star Wars movie.
Conventional capsules are as or more effective at a fraction of cost.
An idea of reusable spacecraft doesn’t pay off as soon as these things still can’t get into space on their own without huge rockets.


19 posted on 04/30/2013 10:41:24 PM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson