If congressional district majority voting is not taken seriously by the GOP, then it is not a serious national party, and it should be treated accordingly.
We will need a new party as they are not really serious about urban voter fraud.
All the arguments for Voter ID laws are just cover for minority disenfranchisement thanks to the BS media.
1 posted on
05/01/2013 10:01:19 AM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
2 posted on
05/01/2013 10:09:00 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: neverdem
rather than by statewide majorities, Mitt Romney rather than Barack Obama would be president today.Helloooooo! We won the last election rather handily . . . ever hear of voter fraud? ever hear of the stupid party trying to stop voter fraud? No? Neither have I.
We'll never win the big picture as long as voter fraud continues . . . we'll have libtard generated candidates like Romney, even though NONE OF US WANTED HIM . . . unless we can control voter fraud.
3 posted on
05/01/2013 10:12:20 AM PDT by
laweeks
To: neverdem
It’s rather simplistic to do “what-if” scenarios to go to district majority voting for only the states the GOP lost.
4 posted on
05/01/2013 10:15:02 AM PDT by
Atlas Sneezed
(Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Oppression -> Extermination)
To: neverdem
To: neverdem
Personally I think the idea would lead to gerrymandering on steroids.
21 posted on
05/01/2013 2:45:45 PM PDT by
Fledermaus
(I'm done with the GOP. Let them wither and die. We need to start over.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
