Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There’s Twice as Much Oil Below North Dakota than We Thought
Free Enterprise ^ | 5/1/13 | Sean Hackbarth

Posted on 05/01/2013 12:27:59 PM PDT by Nachum

Don’t expect the energy boom in Montana and the Dakotas to end anytime soon. According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the formations below these three states hold double the amount of oil and triple the amount of natural gas than was believed five years ago. National Journal reports:

The formations, called Bakken and Three Forks, span much of western North Dakota, the northern tip of South Dakota and the northeastern tip of Montana. The last time the United States Geological Survey assessed this area for its oil and gas reserves was in 2008. But that assessment did not include the Three Forks formation, which explains the substantial increase in the estimates. USGS estimates that these two formations together hold 7.4 billion barrels of undiscovered—but technically recoverable—oil and 6.7 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

Reuters points out that USGS estimates are often conservative. The United States Geological Survey noted that 450 million barrels of oil have already been produced from these formations since 2008. Expect much more to come.

(Excerpt) Read more at freeenterprise.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: North Dakota
KEYWORDS: bakken; dakota; drilling; energy; north; oil; usgs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Nachum

It is double only in the places the gummit allowed them to explore. It is more likely between 5 and 10 times since we have only explored a small percentage of our land.

Pray for America to Wake Up


21 posted on 05/01/2013 1:00:46 PM PDT by bray (Surviving to spite Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

My bet is that if you drill deep enough ANYWHERE you hit natural gas and/or oil.


22 posted on 05/01/2013 1:01:03 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to behead anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Here comes the EPA with a giant cork.


23 posted on 05/01/2013 1:06:02 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

High testosterone horse power hopes spring eternal! lol


24 posted on 05/01/2013 1:07:32 PM PDT by TigersEye (If babies had guns they wouldn't be aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: henkster
I’m coming around to the notion that the earth does indeed “manufacture” crude oil and gas.

Some of us came around to that years ago based on Dr. Thomas Gold's writings. That and the discovery that hydrocarbons (methane, etc.) are common on some of the other planets in our solar system and probably in the universe at large. Dead dinosaurs and primordial plant life (the "fossils" in fossil fuel) are not required.

The continued belief that they are is just one more example of the death grip scientists (aka the "experts") use to hold on to whatever conventional wisdom their theses, dissertations, and "publish or perish" writings were based on. People whose entire self image is based on airs of intellectual superiority find it especially hard to admit they could be wrong. I once royally pi**ed of my professor / academic adviser when I told him that I would not pursue a PhD by saying I was not interested in "joining the priesthood". My opinion about that hasn't changed in the 30 plus years since.

25 posted on 05/01/2013 1:18:02 PM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The left doesn’t want us to conserve energy because they fear it running out anytime soon -

they just don’t want us to use it because cheap energy = freedom for the common man.


26 posted on 05/01/2013 1:19:49 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ez
Your; "Care should be taken to develop the resource while keeping the Dakotas rural."

Creeping liberalism is always a concern. One thing the Dakotas have to combat that is winter. Most liberals just won't put forth the effort to survive ours.

27 posted on 05/01/2013 1:24:50 PM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The EPA is planning using it for collateral to secure our debt to foreign countries as we borrow more to send to our enemies. Our Chinese overlords won’t be worried about environmental impact when they call in the debt.


28 posted on 05/01/2013 1:26:18 PM PDT by informavoracious (We're being "punished" with Stanley Ann's baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Peek, oil.


29 posted on 05/01/2013 1:27:48 PM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator

There’s certain democrat demographics that don’t tolerate cold very well,
so there’s a voting block you don’t have to worry about skewing your politics.


30 posted on 05/01/2013 1:30:18 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rinnwald

Knock knock
who’s there

OIL!


31 posted on 05/01/2013 1:30:46 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
They are drilling in ND for sure:


32 posted on 05/01/2013 1:33:19 PM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez
Care should be taken to develop the resource while keeping the Dakotas rural.

How do imagine that will happen? How can towns expand to handle another 50,000 oil workers and the multitude of others jobs to feed, house and otherwise provide services and stay rural?

33 posted on 05/01/2013 1:55:52 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
My bet is that if you drill deep enough ANYWHERE you hit natural gas and/or oil.

Are you betting real money? Want to buy some oil leases outside of a sedimentary basin? You can buy oil leases cheap in Hawaii for good reason.

34 posted on 05/01/2013 1:57:37 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There’s a place in Texas where they drilled deep enough and hit a pocket of molten sulphur ~ so that’s not exactly true in all cases.


35 posted on 05/01/2013 2:37:50 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: thackney
North Dakota has limits ~ first, how many peeps can deal with the climate.

They may well be at the doorstep of that one!

36 posted on 05/01/2013 4:31:02 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is a flank attack........ it is justification that we don’t need the Keystone pipeline.


37 posted on 05/01/2013 4:55:56 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
There’s a place in Texas where they drilled deep enough and hit a pocket of molten sulphur

Sulfur melts at 239°F. Not that extreme when you go down to the depth we drill these days.

38 posted on 05/02/2013 5:43:29 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
North Dakota has limits ~ first, how many peeps can deal with the climate.

My problem with the statement was it sounded like we needed to establish government control to keep it rural.

39 posted on 05/02/2013 5:44:39 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Frack U
nobody does it better !
             

40 posted on 05/02/2013 5:50:30 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson