Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/02/2013 10:35:34 AM PDT by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: ColdOne

Kansas needs to tell Holder he does not have standing...


28 posted on 05/02/2013 10:53:01 AM PDT by El Laton Caliente (NRA Life Member & www.Gunsnet.net Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

Obama couldn’t care less about the constitution. It has become Might Is Right.


29 posted on 05/02/2013 10:54:06 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

Moulon Labe.

Hold firm, Kansas. The whole danged state.


32 posted on 05/02/2013 10:58:04 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (All observant Muslims want to kill you. If they don't, they are not really Muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

Well, no. Federal Laws infringing on the right to keep and bear arms are unconstitutional, and may appropriately be ignored by the states, and resisted as needed.


33 posted on 05/02/2013 11:01:59 AM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

The tree of liberty is looking mighty parched.


35 posted on 05/02/2013 11:02:57 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

Bloody Kansas II ?


36 posted on 05/02/2013 11:04:43 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne
We as conservatives need to start arguing for policies as if there were no Constitution. Because, in reality, there is not one.

When debating with liberals you don't want to bring up the constitution because it will only be used as a weapon against those who respect it by those who don't. They will be more than happy to use it to score political points and then abandon it when it is no longer useful.

They will twist the 4th amendment or the 1st amendment or the 14th amendment to mean some new thing that it didn't mean at the time it was written. Then when a conservative points out exactly what it says in the 2nd amendment, the liberal will say, "Well, the constitution is outdated and doesn't really apply any more."

In any debate, you need to first agree on the principals and then argue why the principals endorse your position and refute your opponents position.

It used to be we all agreed that the constitution, the way it was written, was supreme and sovereign. It was entirely appropriate to use it in an argument. That is no longer the case. We now have to back up a few steps in our argument and use other principals which are agreed upon. (if there are any)

38 posted on 05/02/2013 11:05:35 AM PDT by nitzy (You can avoid reality but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

Oh I see.... NOW you are worried about the Constitution.


39 posted on 05/02/2013 11:06:21 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

New York law now prohibits me from loading more than 7 rounds of ammo in a magazine for my semi-auto pistols. Federal law has no such limitation. Since the two laws conflict, does that mean that I can ignore New York law?


40 posted on 05/02/2013 11:08:07 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

To Eric Holder. We don’t much care what you think. We are not going to surrender our guns, we pity the fool that tries to make us.


43 posted on 05/02/2013 11:15:49 AM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne
Go back and re-read the 10th Amendment, Doofis !
45 posted on 05/02/2013 11:20:45 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

Hey holder you putz does that apply to our border agents who are being told what laws to enforce and which ones not to,when they swear an oath to enforce all laws?


46 posted on 05/02/2013 11:22:52 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends
Yesterday, Eric threatened Kansas over its new law to nullify federal gun control measures.
We felt it required a response that could be summed up in 5 words or less.

Someone had to say it:






Please Support Free Republic Today.

344 posted on 05/02/2013 9:54:53 AM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)

49 posted on 05/02/2013 11:26:04 AM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

I don’t believe that it’s for Mr. Holder to decide.


51 posted on 05/02/2013 11:26:46 AM PDT by MWestMom ( "I will not sit quietly and let [the president] shed the constitution." Senator Rand Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

holder you ass,if you were doing your job,and we’re loyal to your oath,Kansas would not have to pass laws to protect its citizens 2nd amendment rights from America Haters like you who should be in Leavenworth for shipping thousands of automatic weapons to drug cartels who used them to slaughter Mexican men women &children


52 posted on 05/02/2013 11:28:03 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

As a sixth generation Kansan Holder, just be gone and stay gone.


53 posted on 05/02/2013 11:30:59 AM PDT by kawhill (kawhill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

Ted Nugent on CNN: If you wanna stop illegal gun trafficking, arrest Eric Holder

http://www.therightscoop.com/ted-nugent-on-cnn-if-you-wanna-stop-illegal-gun-trafficking-arrest-eric-holder/


54 posted on 05/02/2013 11:33:28 AM PDT by sheikdetailfeather (Yuri Bezmenov (KGB Defector) - "Kick The Communists Out of Your Govt. & Don't Accept Their Goodies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

Chief Justice Holder has rendered his verdict. Now let him enforce it.


55 posted on 05/02/2013 11:36:21 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

This sword cuts both ways. Holder’s attitude for when the administration commits unconstitutional acts is to ignore it, and say “take us to court”, knowing that the process will take years.

However, this is what the states should do right back to Holder. Thank him for his “non-binding opinion” over their state laws, and that when some federal agents try to enforce what is illegal in their state, and they are arrested for it, he should feel free to take the state to federal court to get his flunkies back. In a few years. And they will continue to stay in jail until that time.


57 posted on 05/02/2013 11:42:44 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

Lol, so now Holder finds the Constitution relevent! But he still lacks understanding of it.


59 posted on 05/02/2013 11:55:43 AM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson