Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Deeper into the abyss.
1 posted on 05/03/2013 10:23:16 AM PDT by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: newgeezer

What about the child who may need to know who their biological father is? hmmmmm


2 posted on 05/03/2013 10:24:14 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do ithat when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

I WISH that an EF5 Tornado would hit Des Moines and WHIPE it off of the map!


4 posted on 05/03/2013 10:26:49 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

And when polygamy becomes law, how many names will go on birth certificates?


6 posted on 05/03/2013 10:30:04 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

Well, in this day and age, I’d like to see a “partner”, spirtual, emotional or otherwise be potentially held legally responsible for a life they commit to being, transitioned or sustained in whatever manner in support of their deviate lifestyle.

I actually see this as a stakehold in repsponsibility that lashes the other, not child-bearing partner, to a potential financial responsibility other than the poor schmuck man they may or may not have tricked into their deviate schemes.

Bring it on! Make both of them carpet munchers responsible for that life they misdirected and probably ruined. I say good.


7 posted on 05/03/2013 10:30:17 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

Put the turkey baster on there too then - it had more to do with the baby than the “other” “mother”.


8 posted on 05/03/2013 10:32:29 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer
This seems like a sensible way to warn the child's future employers about her dysfunctional upbringing.

Let me add that I believe no child should be put into this kind of setting. But then I worry more about the well being of the child than I do about the "fundamental rights" of her so called "parents".

9 posted on 05/03/2013 10:33:19 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

Where do they list the sperm donor? After all, he is the biological father.


10 posted on 05/03/2013 10:35:16 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

I guess the biological father doesn’t count..


14 posted on 05/03/2013 10:44:06 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Constitution? What Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

This is going to really mess up genealogy research down the road. What they deem as “cute” or politically correct... roadblocks that child from finding out their true heritage or bloodline. Also, just gives them something else they can hate you for when they want answers to, “where is my Dad?”


15 posted on 05/03/2013 10:45:37 AM PDT by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

It is also important that birth certificate follow scientific principles of reproduction and list the genetic parents from whom the offspring has sprung, a genetic paper trail, if you will, which may be valuable later in life in diagnosing disorders and charting mutations.


17 posted on 05/03/2013 10:46:38 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

Poor kids. As if they don’t have enough crap in their lives.


18 posted on 05/03/2013 10:47:12 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda¬óDivide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

Dopey.


19 posted on 05/03/2013 10:47:34 AM PDT by jimfree (In November 2016 my 12 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

Actually, Mackinzie is a bastard. All else is just window dressing, pig lipstick.


24 posted on 05/03/2013 11:00:42 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer
“It is important our laws recognize that married lesbian couples who have children enjoy the same benefits and burdens as married opposite-sex couples who have children,” the court wrote in a 29-page decision issued Friday.

I've scoured our constitutions again and a again, and no matter how many times I look, the legislative branch is the only branch with lawmaking power given to it.

27 posted on 05/03/2013 11:10:45 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Life, liberty, property, family, RKBA, sovereignty, security, borders, independence, the oath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer
The Supreme Court’s 2009 Varnum vs. Brien decision legalizing same-sex marriage provides the bedrock for Friday’s decision, the court noted.

It did no such thing. Courts don't make laws. Iowa law to this day recognizes only real marriages.

28 posted on 05/03/2013 11:13:50 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Life, liberty, property, family, RKBA, sovereignty, security, borders, independence, the oath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

And then a year later, the ‘father’ claims ‘that’s not my child and I dare you to prove that it is’!


29 posted on 05/03/2013 11:14:52 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

What an evil, Frankensteinian thing to do to human beings.....denying the Truth and Natural Law and artificially constructing an irrational reality for a child so he can not grow up in a realistic world. Always governed by “feelings” and never reaching maturity where Reason rules the emotions.

How evil and dehumanizing and selfish are these Marxists.

And to think we have a ‘Justice” system that denies Natural Laws (Science) and Reality and Truth. It is disgusting and evil and unconstitutional.

All Just Law has to be Right Reason.


31 posted on 05/03/2013 11:21:04 AM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer
a baby takes a male and a female...a female and a female can not produce, nor a male and a male....

so be "married" you stupid idiots but you can't both claim parentage....its biologically impossible....

let this be a lesson...never let a dtr or niece or anyone female you know give up their baby to just anybody....make sure the child gets to a normal home with a normal marriage...

32 posted on 05/03/2013 11:26:14 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

This is quite literally a coup d’etat. The overturning of our republican form of representative self-government.

And the Republican “leadership” is complicit.

I’m so mad I could spit nails.

This is Varnum II.


33 posted on 05/03/2013 11:28:24 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Life, liberty, property, family, RKBA, sovereignty, security, borders, independence, the oath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

Deeper into the abyss.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
ON the subject of ‘deep abyss’.

I understand that since MD has instituted/passed/signed the ‘do funny marriage bill’ that come 1JAN if a ‘couple’ are partners and NOT MARRIED, they will revert to just another shack up and will not be able to share bennies UNTIL they get married.
Watch the FALLOUT from this little act.

Not only will ‘they’ be suing because the state is FORCING them to marry, once they WIN (and surely they will) the regular shack ups will declare that since the ‘do funnys’ can share bennies without getting married, then the straight shack ups should get bennies also.

And figure that not soon after, conventional room mates (as we know them..share house/apt etc WITH NO SEX INVOLVED) will be clamoring to get in on the act.

SO FAR this just is for State Employees BUT you can imagine the rest of the state will attempt to follow suit. (Dependent on who ‘benefits’ from it).

These new rules are making my hairline ache.


35 posted on 05/03/2013 11:29:33 AM PDT by xrmusn (6/98 --I turn 75 next year- but remember, that's only 24 Celsius. (TKS R. Reagan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson