Posted on 05/03/2013 11:33:48 AM PDT by Dallas59
Speaking at a gathering of digital advertisers in New York City last night, Mr Schmidt refused to forecast when internet video would displace television, instead declaring: "That's already happened."
"It's not a replacement for something that we know," he added. "It's a new thing that we have to think about, to program, to curate and build new platforms."
YouTube recently surpassed the milestone of a billion unique users a month. Only the Google search engine and social network Facebook are frequented more often by those browsing the internet worldwide.
However, the video site lags behind traditional television in the UK, with the average Briton watching four hours and seven minutes of broadcast television per day and just 20 minutes of YouTube in the same period of time.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
If you download a film or newscast or whatever then you can take advantage of the VLC player’s ability to play the video at various speeds but keep the frequency of the sound and voices normal... I use it often to play recorded talk shows at about 1.5x normal.
Sometimes it’s useful also to slow down a really fast talker so you can catch everything they say.
A time saver.
Ya’ll realize after a certain proportion of folks switch to the Internet for their video entertainment, companies will begin limiting the amount of data to subscribers, right?
CC
Same here, since Obama was elected the second time, we’ve turned off the TV. “They” lied to us, they don’t cover the news, and the “comedy” sitcoms are totally boring. I get a bigger kick out of watching Hawaii-5-oh...from a simpler, cleaner time, good acting, great scenery...and I’m watching it “free”...along with many other shows of that era. BTW...my CNN addicted lib across the street today said she hadn’t heard about the Gosnel trial when I asked her about it. This woman was a school teacher for years and “researches” everything...but if CNN is all you watch...(I’m still shaking my head).
The airwaves are free to the extent that a broadcaster only has to push its signal out once for all to receive.
Streaming video is a pull model, where all the consumers compete for traffic through a finite pipeline of coaxial cable or DSL. If too many people stream at once, the whole system clogs up and bogs down.
Are we there yet?
-PJ
bookmark
That is true.
Also, the ‘networks’ have to develop a viable and profitable operational mode. Otherwise, they cannot afford to develop new programs.
Right now, the broadcast venue is paying for the development and networks put their programs online more as a curtesy.
One of the big problems for broadcast networks is that people may not want to sit still for 20 minutes of commercials each hour via computer monitors or streaming.
Shrug. It’s still alive?
When the local stations went digital I never bothered with the “upgrade”. Don’t regret it one bit.
The only thing that comes into my house is what I allow through the firewall from the Internet.
KMA MSM
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.