Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bunker-busting behemoth: Pentagon upgrades bomb with Iranian nukes in mind
Fox News ^ | May 03, 2013

Posted on 05/03/2013 2:28:37 PM PDT by Pan_Yan

The Pentagon's biggest bunker-busting bomb has been upgraded with one task in mind: taking out suspected Iranian nuclear facilities built deep under the mountains of the Islamic Republic's northern region.

At 30,000 pounds, the Massive Ordnance Penetrator packs brute force and advanced features meant to enable it to destroy Iran's most fortified nuclear site. The bomb is nearly a third bigger than the MOAB, or so-called "Mother of all Bombs," the 22,000-pound previous generation of bunker busters first built in 2003 but never used outside of tests. Officials are confident the newest bunker-buster can dismantle even the deepest and most fortified nuclear facility.

"Hopefully we never have to use it," a senior U.S. official familiar with the development of the new version told The Wall Street Journal. "But if we had to, it would work."

The Pentagon redesigned the bomb with more advanced features intended to enable it to penetrate even deeper, giving it the ability to destroy Iran's most heavily fortified and defended nuclear site. U.S. officials see development of the weapon as critical to convincing Israel that the U.S. has the ability to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear bomb if diplomacy fails, and also that Israel's military can't do that on its own.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bomb; bunkerbuster; iran; iraniannukes; israel; military; moab; russia; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 05/03/2013 2:28:37 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
"... and also that Israel's military can't do that on its own."

Wanna bet?

2 posted on 05/03/2013 2:32:00 PM PDT by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

balls said the Queen, had I two I’d be king.


3 posted on 05/03/2013 2:33:51 PM PDT by advertising guy (clearly, semi automatic high capacity pressure cookers should be banned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester
Wanna bet?

I don't. Israelis undoubtedly working on bombs of similar capability.

4 posted on 05/03/2013 2:34:25 PM PDT by luvbach1 (We are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Bunker-busting behemoth: Pentagon upgrades bomb with Iranian nukes in mind

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And Obama will use them too. Yes he will. Right after Iran nukes Israel and “wipes it off the map”.


5 posted on 05/03/2013 2:35:30 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

“But if we had to, it would work.”

At 30,000 pounds, it wouldn’t have to work. They just have to drop it.


6 posted on 05/03/2013 2:36:30 PM PDT by Rennes Templar (If guns kill people, how come no one dies at gun shows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Obama will use this weapon ONLY if he is in political hot water over Benghazi or some other scandal and his numbers are severely tanking. Its a ‘wag the dog’ option for him should he need a distraction. We’ve seen this movie before.


7 posted on 05/03/2013 2:37:37 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Selling these to Israel is the kind of foreign aid I can support.


8 posted on 05/03/2013 2:40:43 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

As soon as the Muslims feel good about themselves, we could rebuild the space program and institute the Rods from God. Which should have been done decades ago.

There is your anti-nuke solution. LET THEM bury it as deep as they can. RFG would bury it deeper still.


9 posted on 05/03/2013 2:41:03 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Rods from God followed by a few of these bombs and maybe some nuke perpetrators and we could almost bomb them form this side of the earth.


10 posted on 05/03/2013 2:44:39 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

That is a heck of a rock to kick out of a plane...


11 posted on 05/03/2013 2:48:27 PM PDT by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

All that is needed is a few 2-5 kiloton nukes to seal off the entries to the sites. Israel has plenty of them, so we don’t need to get involved (not that this administration would, anyway).


12 posted on 05/03/2013 2:48:58 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
yeah? and what are they gonna carry it with???
13 posted on 05/03/2013 2:52:40 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Would have to be a modified cargo plane.


14 posted on 05/03/2013 2:55:04 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Chode

I’d think gutting a 747 wouldn’t take long. And they can do good air cover with their US fighters. Not optimal but doable.


15 posted on 05/03/2013 3:00:49 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
it'd take awhile, but yeah they could prolly do it... restructuring the fuselage for a hard point/release mechanism of that size and the bay doors are the only variables
16 posted on 05/03/2013 3:10:17 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Chode

No, C130 style...out the back. Do the 747 cargo planes have a drop down ‘tailgate’ like a C130? Not sure. But I imagine if they HAD to go such a route a standard 47 could be modified.


17 posted on 05/03/2013 3:14:14 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Dear Benjamin,
This is likely just a ploy to keep you from doing what YHVH and you need to do. You have no better friend than Him, no more security than what He provides.
Sincerely, v


18 posted on 05/03/2013 3:18:32 PM PDT by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

727’s have rear cargo door and stairs. How high does one drop this thing from? Below 20,000 feet, I’d want a C-130 doing the business.


19 posted on 05/03/2013 3:29:45 PM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
no... they nose swings up and load through the front
20 posted on 05/03/2013 3:30:31 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson