Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton is guilty of "dereliction of duty" on Benghazi
Youtube ^ | 5/2/13 | Mofopolitics, Omarosa Morgan

Posted on 05/05/2013 9:07:12 PM PDT by Nachum

click here to read article

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: Nachum

At the ceremony when the four bodies were returned to the USA, didn’t the hilldabeast look them in the eye and tell one of the families of those she had left to be slaughtered that she wouldn’t rest until those responsible were brought to justice and then go on to speak of the anti-islam video.

81 posted on 05/06/2013 9:47:31 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Lest we forget:

Washington Times: The Robins Report: Is a General losing his job over Benghazi? [General Ham]

Maybe retired General Ham should be called as a technical witness in the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi-Gate.

I would like to hear what retired General Ham has to say about Benghazi -- even if it is his personal opinion...

82 posted on 05/06/2013 10:12:41 AM PDT by topher (Traditional values -- especially family values -- which have been proven over time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Thank you so much MM!

83 posted on 05/06/2013 1:35:31 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


The real question is; WHY is Rand Paul helping OBastard out from behind the eight ball? I’m trusting him less and less daily.

84 posted on 05/06/2013 10:32:18 PM PDT by Segovia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Hillary needs to be effectively barred from future public life (such as running for President), but Obozo should be in the “buck stops here” situation.

The extreme double standards of the dishonest MSM are on display yet again. I remember how the media made a huge fuss in 1981 when it was reported that President Reagan was not awakened in the middle of the night about the Libyan planes incident in the Gulf of Sidra:

In that case the episode was already over, two hostile Libyan planes had been shot down and no US forces were waiting on any Presidential decision, but the MSM made a huge fuss to paint Reagan as old and out of touch.

2012: Obama and Hillary ignore US lives under fire while there are ample means to effect a rescue, MSM covers for lib politicians

1981: Episode with Libyan fighters is over within minutes, two Libyan planes are downed under standing orders for self-defense in International waters, but MSM makes big fuss to smear President Reagan because he was not awakened after an incident which was already over.

Media are hypocritical, propagandistic scum.

85 posted on 05/07/2013 10:51:58 AM PDT by Enchante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Hear, hear Mr. Paul!

86 posted on 05/07/2013 11:39:19 AM PDT by swampthang77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Rush, who says he’s right 98.9% of the time, is so off base this week on this.

He says the democratic party and Obama will be lining up to defend Hillary at all costs. The reason? They owe it to her, and get this because if she goes down they go down with her.

What a laugh. Obama will throw her under the bus faster than you can say Monica Lewinsky backwards, and as the truth comes out on this the democrats will, in bipartisan fashion, skewer her.

You’re right, she thought she was going come out on top being SOS. She did nothing. Accomplished nothing. Served the post with no background for the job.

She’s threw. She’s not a politician, she’s simply the wife of one. She has no horse sense.

She lawyered up soon after Benghazi, and planned her testimony ploy, which will also backfire on her.

No, sorry, Rush. You’re waaaaay off base on this one.

87 posted on 05/07/2013 12:46:04 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

“Hill” accomplished nothing as secretary of state, but neither did most of her predecessors. People don’t know she failed in the job and will support her.

88 posted on 05/07/2013 9:07:29 PM PDT by Theodore R. ("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson