Skip to comments.Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton is guilty of "dereliction of duty" on Benghazi
Posted on 05/05/2013 9:07:12 PM PDT by Nachum
click here to read article
At the ceremony when the four bodies were returned to the USA, didn’t the hilldabeast look them in the eye and tell one of the families of those she had left to be slaughtered that she wouldn’t rest until those responsible were brought to justice and then go on to speak of the anti-islam video.
Maybe retired General Ham should be called as a technical witness in the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi-Gate.
I would like to hear what retired General Ham has to say about Benghazi -- even if it is his personal opinion...
Thank you so much MM!
The real question is; WHY is Rand Paul helping OBastard out from behind the eight ball? I’m trusting him less and less daily.
Hillary needs to be effectively barred from future public life (such as running for President), but Obozo should be in the “buck stops here” situation.
The extreme double standards of the dishonest MSM are on display yet again. I remember how the media made a huge fuss in 1981 when it was reported that President Reagan was not awakened in the middle of the night about the Libyan planes incident in the Gulf of Sidra:
In that case the episode was already over, two hostile Libyan planes had been shot down and no US forces were waiting on any Presidential decision, but the MSM made a huge fuss to paint Reagan as old and out of touch.
2012: Obama and Hillary ignore US lives under fire while there are ample means to effect a rescue, MSM covers for lib politicians
1981: Episode with Libyan fighters is over within minutes, two Libyan planes are downed under standing orders for self-defense in International waters, but MSM makes big fuss to smear President Reagan because he was not awakened after an incident which was already over.
Media are hypocritical, propagandistic scum.
Hear, hear Mr. Paul!
Rush, who says he’s right 98.9% of the time, is so off base this week on this.
He says the democratic party and Obama will be lining up to defend Hillary at all costs. The reason? They owe it to her, and get this because if she goes down they go down with her.
What a laugh. Obama will throw her under the bus faster than you can say Monica Lewinsky backwards, and as the truth comes out on this the democrats will, in bipartisan fashion, skewer her.
You’re right, she thought she was going come out on top being SOS. She did nothing. Accomplished nothing. Served the post with no background for the job.
She’s threw. She’s not a politician, she’s simply the wife of one. She has no horse sense.
She lawyered up soon after Benghazi, and planned her testimony ploy, which will also backfire on her.
No, sorry, Rush. You’re waaaaay off base on this one.
“Hill” accomplished nothing as secretary of state, but neither did most of her predecessors. People don’t know she failed in the job and will support her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.