Skip to comments.
Justice Department to monitor South Carolina congressional election
Reuters ^
| 6 May 2013
| Ian Simpson and Harriet McLeod
Posted on 05/06/2013 3:20:47 PM PDT by mandaladon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Something seems a little odd here.
To: mandaladon
Make sure Colbert’s sister wins.
2
posted on
05/06/2013 3:23:47 PM PDT
by
Argus
To: mandaladon
3
posted on
05/06/2013 3:28:51 PM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: mandaladon
Newly hired DOJ election monitor.
4
posted on
05/06/2013 3:31:32 PM PDT
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
To: mandaladon
Justice Department 
5
posted on
05/06/2013 3:32:01 PM PDT
by
tomkat
To: mandaladon
6
posted on
05/06/2013 3:35:05 PM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: mandaladon
Why, exactly? I don’t think either one of them is black or Muslim, so what is the interest of the DOJ in this?
That said, I’m disgusted with SC voters for letting sleazy Sanford (who will lose) get the nomination. The guy just abandoned his state to go off and play with his mistress in Argentina, and now all is forgiven? Gimme a break.
My daughter, who lives in SC, told me that the other candidates were very marginal, so they may have some excuse. But I think he was probably the choice of the GOP-e, since he no doubt has money, is very liberal and thus is their kind of guy.
7
posted on
05/06/2013 3:35:35 PM PDT
by
livius
To: mandaladon
8
posted on
05/06/2013 3:36:16 PM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: Argus
Right. No reason to monitor other than to ensure the fix is in for the democrat.
9
posted on
05/06/2013 3:36:27 PM PDT
by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: mandaladon
How about scanning thumb prints to make sure everyone’s vote counts as a whole vote not a diminished vote due to the inner city multi-voters?
10
posted on
05/06/2013 3:39:01 PM PDT
by
FreeAtlanta
(bahits.com)
To: Argus
They probably want to make sure Sanford wins, since that helps the Dem more.
To: mandaladon
South Carolina's new law mandating photo identification for voters That should be required in every American election, with some sort of similar diligence (fingerprints, perhaps) in absentee ballotting.
Come to think of it, our computer age technology can handle 100% election fingerprint checking without disclosing how people vote.
To: Argus
Rolling, rolling, rolling, keep them voter fraud buses rolling.......
To: nickcarraway
It is GOP vs Dem. Not a primary.
14
posted on
05/06/2013 3:51:22 PM PDT
by
lonestar
(It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
To: 2nd amendment mama
15
posted on
05/06/2013 4:04:57 PM PDT
by
basil
(basil --Second Amendment Sisters.org)
To: mandaladon
Fraud, and multi-voting by the parasitic tribabal masses is going to be PROTECTED, but YOUR Taxdollars. Poll Watchers will be escorted out, locked out, or intimidated, to assure a Dem win, no matter what the actual vote is. The Presidential Election of 2008, and 2012, BOTH were the most-corrupt in History.
16
posted on
05/06/2013 5:14:22 PM PDT
by
traditional1
(Amerika.....Providing public housing for the Mulatto Messiah)
To: mandaladon
Holder bringin’ his Black Pampers with him?
17
posted on
05/06/2013 5:21:31 PM PDT
by
Mortrey
(Impeach President Soros)
To: mandaladon
Mark Sanford had better do what Chris Christie did-—have lawyers waiting in the wings IMMEDIATELY.
18
posted on
05/06/2013 5:22:34 PM PDT
by
Mortrey
(Impeach President Soros)
To: mandaladon
And the winner is...Alvin Greene!
19
posted on
05/06/2013 9:00:50 PM PDT
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: mandaladon; l8pilot; 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; ...
Our first election requiring photo ID. This is significant.
South Carolina Ping
Send FReepmail to join or leave this list.
Keep up with what our Congresscritters are doing. Sign up for the free MegaVote email service here.
20
posted on
05/07/2013 4:53:31 AM PDT
by
upchuck
(To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
