Posted on 05/08/2013 1:04:52 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Good analysis of a weak and/or duplicitous campaign.
You should be
No, he did not. Romney received about 59.1 million, and McCain received about 59.9 million. That calculates to McCain receiving about a million more than Romney.
Obama beat McCain by about 10 million but only beat Romney by about 3.5 million.
Those who did not vote against Obama put Obama into office. It’s just that simple.
“If you are dead when your heart stops, why aren’t you alive when it starts.”
Well, you really are alive when it starts, aren’t you?
The LIVs don’t even know who this Ben Ghazi guy is! Romney could have stood on his head and whistled Dixie and it wouldn’t have mattered one bit. Obama and his sycophants, along with the Spanish company counting the votes (sic), rigged the vote counts in the key swing states and it was all over. ...and this will continue to happen in every national election going forward until the Repubs really grow a pair and put a stop to it! I doubt that will ever happen!
2012: Romney got 60,932,795, or 47.21%
2008: McCain got 59,948,323, or 45.65%
So, Romney did better than McCain both in absolute numbers and by percentage. Zero won an absolute majority in both elections.
Those who did not vote against Obama put Obama into office. It’s just that simple.
Probably true. And some of them are here.
agreed
Stop it.
Don’t pull up incomplete numbers and try to pass them off when real ones are close by.
Here’s Fed. Gov. totals:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/historical.html
Here’s Dave Leip’s:
http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/
Correct, flak means you’re over the target. Bomb harder and send more wings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.