Never liked Rubio, he speaks out of both sides of his mouth.
Good news, the witch is dead.
So Rubio thinks that we need to import more fags?
U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy on Tuesday proposed a gay rights amendment to the Senate’s immigration bill, prompting one of the measure’s Republican sponsors to repeat his prediction that it could sink the legislation. “It’ll kill the bill,” Florida Senator Marco Rubio said in a brief interview.
It must be upside down day. For once - I agree with Leahy.
Rubio is right. Adding gay rights WILL kill the bill.
So, Go Pat Go!
Maybe they think the GOP wants amnesty badly enough that they'll buy more radical leftwing bells & whistles.
On the other hand, maybe the democrats want to kill the bill altogether.
And if he becomes the nominee in 2016? What then?
Good! Let it die.
Sure they will. Scratch my back, I'll scratch yours - it would take a professional politician to appreciate that, though...oh, wait...
Well you what they say Rube-io, lay down with dogs, get up with fleas.
Say goodbye to your presidential aspirations, ya shmuck.
You’ve misspelled Rubio’s name. It should be Rub[e]io, as in Rube. Schumer’s done a great job of selling him a certain bridge in Brooklyn.
All his opponents need to do is morph his face into Mark Zuckerberg's and he's finished.
I agree with Senator Rubio that adding a 'gay rights' amendment to the immigration 'reform' bill will and should kill it. Whether by Democrat design or just Democrat arrogance, killing that bill would be a victory for America, even if most Americans are too disconnected from the grim reality of amnesty for illegal aliens to appreciate it's death.
To the question of what will we do if Marco Rubio becomes the 2016 Republican presidential candidate, my response is that unless he demonstrates a quick and verifiable reversal of his present course of pushing deeply flawed laws giving American citizenship to illegal aliens and shows a verifiable (by his votes as well as his words) adherence to the U.S. constitution, I will not contribut a dime to his campaign (the RNC) and I will vote independent. What is the point of electing yet another big-government RINO who does what Democrats do and puts the 'Republican' stamp on it? Enough of that.
they can piss off, now we are open to all homosexuals in the world to come here, no FRIGGING CHANCE
It's not Leahy's first rodeo. Perhaps we should assume his intent is to kill the bill. So as to keep it as a campaign issue? To avoid getting blamed for something so unpopular? Others more Washington-savvy than I would know.
I thought that we already have laws covering this;
Sure would be nice if the Republicans on the committee “cross over” and vote for the gay amendment - it would CLOBBER the Dems.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
This immigration bill sounds worse than 0bastardCAare. It will bankrupt the country, make even fewer jobs available for Americans, flood the country with people who should stay in their home countries, and now will increase the number of homosexuals here, as if we didn't have enough. And how many of these immigrants will have fake "long term committed" whatevers just to bring someone else in? Actually IMHO one of the reasons the leftists want to flood the country with more immigrants is to reduce the percentage of Americans with European ancestry; that's just one of many reasons.
Anyone wanting on/off either ping list, freepmail me.