Skip to comments.Report: CBS News Bosses Irked by Correspondent's Thorough Benghazi Reporting
Posted on 05/08/2013 3:20:49 PM PDT by MissesBush
The biggest Benghazi-related story that took place outside of the House Oversight Committee's hearing room today is this item in Politico, regarding CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson. She's the reporter who famously drew White House officials' profane ire over her unapologetic pursuit of the Fast & Furious scandal story; now she's apparently facing searing criticism from another source: Her own bosses. Why? Because she's been covering the Benghazi story too aggressively. Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you media bias:
"Attkisson, who holds a third-degree black belt in taekwondo, takes a fighting stance when she feels shes being stonewalled. Which is exactly what she thinks the White House has done to her on Benghazi," Farhi writes. But from where Attkisson is sitting, there are actually two Goliaths, one of which is almost entirely absent from the Post profile. The second Goliath is CBS News, which has grown increasingly frustrated with Attkisson's Benghazi campaign. CBS News executives see Attkisson wading dangerously close to advocacy on the issue, network sources have told POLITICO. Attkisson can't get some of her stories on the air, and is thus left feeling marginalized and underutilized. That, in part, is why Attkisson is in talks to leave CBS ahead of contract, as POLITICO reported in April. Farhi mentions "internal conflicts" in the final paragraph, though he seems to dismiss them. The "internal conflicts" are indeed real -- Attkisson is still eyeing an exit, according to sources -- and provide important context for today's piece. Today, CBS News is celebrating Attkisson's commitment to the Benghazi story. It's good press. But that support is an aberration.
"Dangerously close to advocacy"? That's how CBS News apparently views the work of a reporter who is doggedly seeking truth about an issue of enormous importance that many of her colleagues have scrupulously ignored. Remarkable. And as Ed Morrissey noticed, Attkisson's Twitter feed went curiously silent very early on during today's hearings. What happened? Allahpundit thinks he knows what's going on here, and I agree with him:
[The media establishment and liberals] cant stop conservative media from existing, but they can ghettoize it as illegitimate and partisan in a way that their own partisan garbage isnt....Skepticism about Benghazi is fine for the wingnuts at Fox, but bringing such unhelpful nonsense into an impartial, i.e. pro-Obama, outlet like CBS risks lending credence to the GOPs accusations. The proper line to take on Benghazi is to dismiss the new hearings with a sneer, a la Joe Klein, or, in the case of impartial news coverage, to dismiss them more lightly by referencing Hillarys long-ago whining about a vast right-wing conspiracy to discredit the Clintons. Going where the story leads is unhelpful to liberalism in this case, ergo its advocacy by definition.
Attkisson's reporting makes Benghazi harder to pigeonhole as a right-wing conspiratorial obsession. CBS News owns a(n unjustified) platinum reputation in lefty media circles, rendering one of their correspondent's tireless work on an unhelpful subject doubly unhelpful. Thus, the suits are marginalizing her and questioning her integrity, accusing her of walking dangerously close to the activism line. Shameful. I'll leave you with two other tweets that shed light on how much of the media will cover today's events:
Message one: Only out-of-touch old white guys and nutty conservatives care about this story. The Chick-fil-A reference was a dead giveaway, just in case the other descriptors were a little too subtle. Message two: Republicans are only beating the drum on Benghazi (you know, that unresolved terrorist attack that killed a sitting ambassador and three other Americans) to damage Hillary Clinton ahead of 2016. In other words, this is just another political food fight, America. Feel free to move along.
The mainstream media is corrupt
That’s a great point that you raise - the media bias and hypocrisy on this is disgusting.
Future Fox News reporter?
Hopefully Attkisson will start to set a trend in the media: Journalists for Truth.
When See-BS is unhappy, good people are happy!
Roger Ailes may be seeing another good hire?
CBS bosses irked.
Hmm. I’ll bet they are.
One day these media ‘executives’ are gonna hang. They have sold their country down the river for the benefit of their political love object.
The mainstream media is corrupt
MSM.gov is corrupt to the max. The fourth estate has become a fifth column.
No. But one day they will work in fuel production for the ruling ferals in Bartertown. One day soon.
She’ll have a home at Fox News.
I think Ailes is only interested in hiring people who are somewhere left of Bob Beckel, Juan Williams, and Alan Colmes.
Are they all majority or part-owned by Saudis or some other entities that would not want American news reported to Americans?
Isn't it obvious by now that we've been taken over and we, the people, have lost control over our nation: our currency, our blood and our treasure, our borders, our elections and our media?
It is to me, and controlling our national dialog is the key and their trump card.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.