Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/09/2013 8:42:05 AM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mozilla

Psychologists and psychiatrists would be prudent to band together and not support this. If the “accuser” tag gets out, their business is for sh!t in any sense of the word.


2 posted on 05/09/2013 8:45:33 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mozilla
Always remain on guard! A blast from the distant past. 1930s I think.


3 posted on 05/09/2013 8:50:04 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (When someone burns a cross on your lawn, the best firehose is an AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mozilla

I won’t be losing my guns, because I never participated in or will participate in the background check system. So they can put me on any list they want, and I will continue to get any gun I want from the “sources” I always have...


4 posted on 05/09/2013 8:51:22 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mozilla

The real “trouble guns” in this country are ghetto and barrio guns.
Let him do a sweep through those ‘hoods by executive order, and really make a positive difference.

(((((crickets)))))


5 posted on 05/09/2013 8:53:25 AM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mozilla; All
Regarding constitutionally undefined executive orders, please consider the following. The Founding States made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, Sections 1-3 of Article I, to clarify that all federal legislative powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not the Oval Office or the Supreme Court.

In fact, the Supreme Court reflected on the statutes referenced above when it officially clarified in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer that executive orders do not have the force of law unless legislatively supported by Congress. And since we already know that Obama doesn't have the Senate's support with respect to taking away our gun rights, Obama can make paper airplanes out of any executive orders that attempt to do so.

Executive order

Note that evidently one of our liberal "friends" at Wikipedia has worded the first paragraph of the page referenced above to give the impression that executive orders have the force of law. But also note that the explanation slips up by using the term "delegated legislation" which ignores the Founders' clarification that all federal legislative powers are vested in the elected members of Congress and therefore not delegatable.

In fact, the history section of that page linked to above essentially backpedals and admits that executive orders have to be supported by congressional legislation.

Again, Obama clearly has no support for gun control in the divided Congress which is necessary for any executive order that he makes for gun control to have any teeth.

11 posted on 05/09/2013 10:05:25 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mozilla

Deep pockets work both ways. Most doctors now work for hospitals or medical groups. If someone loses his firearms for telling a doctor or nurse about them, the hospital or group medical practice is on the hook for any counter-suit.


12 posted on 05/09/2013 10:20:31 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mozilla

“unable to manage your financial affairs.”

So if they say you can’t balance your checkbook, then you lose your constitutional rights.

I guess the above means the government shouldn’t have guns then?


14 posted on 05/09/2013 7:11:24 PM PDT by rfreedom4u (I have a copy of the Constitution! And I'm not afraid to use it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson