Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HILLARY MISLED CONGRESS--BUT NOT UNDER OATH
http://www.breitbart.com/ ^ | may 9 2013 | by JOEL B. POLLAK

Posted on 05/09/2013 3:59:46 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45

Wednesday's testimony on the Benghazi terror attacks by State Department whistleblowers before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform contradicted several statements by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in testimony before House and Senate committees in January. However, while Clinton may have misled Congress in her testimony, she likely did not commit perjury because she never actually testified under oath.

Video recordings of Clinton's Jan. 23 testimony before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee suggest that she was never sworn in.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghazibenghazilies; benghazilies; hillarybenghazi; lyingtocongress; perjury; sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Para-Ord.45

If this is true it makes the GOP committee members, accessories after the fact, to a crime.


21 posted on 05/09/2013 4:29:43 PM PDT by swamprebel (a Constitution once changed from Freedom, can never be restored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forgotten man

After the Amnesty vote today I am convinced that there are only 4 Republicans in the Senate.

The rest are RINO’s and cowards and trash.

I hate it when I hear some Senator refer to other as the “Honorable” There is no honor in the Senate, only career thieves sucking off the Government teat.


22 posted on 05/09/2013 4:30:21 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
HILLARY MISLED CONGRESS--BUT NOT UNDER OATH

Misled, my ass. Have the guts to call a LIE a LIE. She LIED!!! She is CURRUPT. Any wonder she lost her law license? Of course not...She is a LIAR...she is CURRUPT!! Just ask Vince Foster.

23 posted on 05/09/2013 4:30:48 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

Under oath? Not under oath? What difference would it have made???

24 posted on 05/09/2013 4:31:29 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I do not think that they could have compelled her with a subpoena at that point. I think only a “Special Investigative Committee”... appointed by boehner... has that power. At least that is how I understood Mark Levin yesterday. They probably had to agree that none of the demons had to be put under oath. They knew that she would lie so that when they put her under oath... she will have to decide whether she will lie again or whether she will tell the truth and condemn herself with the truth. Either way... and I have no idea what will happen... but I do think that any plan that she had for another run at the presidency... is finished regardless.

LLS

25 posted on 05/09/2013 4:41:20 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
"Hillary misled Congress, but not under oath"

"Under oath? Not under oath? What difference would it have made???"

Absolutely none. But when Hillary gave aid and comfort to the enemy, that's treason, whether she was under oath or not.

26 posted on 05/09/2013 4:42:28 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

She was also not under oath when she lied to the American people. It will not help her... she will face the truth of her treason... she may never feel the sting of Justice but she will never be president either.

LLS


27 posted on 05/09/2013 4:44:11 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
definition of “is” all over again...
Rose Law records, cattle futures, Vince Foster....
She cannot be touched.

Do you ever get the feeling that the clowns in DC are all in a conspiracy together and someone is pulling the strings? Anyone else with her history would've been in Supermax long ago.

28 posted on 05/09/2013 4:44:12 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Benghazi - When you abandon four men to a terrorist mob, it is murder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

After the Amnesty vote today I am convinced that there are only 4 Republicans in the Senate.

The rest are RINO’s and cowards and trash.

I hate it when I hear some Senator refer to other as the “Honorable” There is no honor in the Senate, only career thieves sucking off the Government teat.

If we can;t primary these RINOs out we need to demand that they switch parties and become Democraps so we can run someone against them...


29 posted on 05/09/2013 4:46:37 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse
Even if she had been under oath there is as much chance of her being prosecuted for perjury as her husband.

The consequences should come when and if she runs for President. Any opponent, Democrat or Republican, should ram this down her throat. Not only did she lie to the American people, she showed incredibly bad judgment in a crisis. Not qualified to be the leader of the free world.

30 posted on 05/09/2013 4:48:41 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

WE SHOULDN’T LET ANY CLUNTON NEAR ANY GOVERNMENT POSITION EVER AGAIN! AND F@CK CHELSEA, THAT WEBB HUBBLE LOOKING DEMON SPAWN.


31 posted on 05/09/2013 4:49:11 PM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thouworm

It has been one of those days...just pure outrage after outrage after outrage.. I am just feeling beat down and hopeless now.

This country is run by criminals,fools and traitors. our media is run by corrupted statists whose only concern is for their own marxist political aims. Our citizens care more about American Idol than the future of our great country.i cannot find one single thing to be hopeful about right now.


32 posted on 05/09/2013 4:54:52 PM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

As far as I’m concerned every government employee should be considered as always under oath.


33 posted on 05/09/2013 4:57:54 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends


Hey Lamestream:
Witch Hunt?




He// No!

She's never been lost.

Please Support Free Republic Today!

34 posted on 05/09/2013 4:58:41 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

She worked for me and EVERY other taxpayer in this country. I expect my employees to tell the truth. She’s not some f**king goddess or queen who can do whatever she wants. She drinks too much and falls down. There’s a real display of greatness.


35 posted on 05/09/2013 5:02:21 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

What’s the big deal. Impel her to testify under oath to the same things she claimed when she wasn’t under oath. If she differs in her testimony, investigate it.

Our current RINO/CINO congress doesn’t have the balls to do it. She knows that. She skates.


36 posted on 05/09/2013 5:33:41 PM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Bingo.

That or they KNEW of gun-running from Libya to terrorists in Syria and and condoned it.


37 posted on 05/09/2013 5:37:07 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

Call Congress.

202-225-3121


38 posted on 05/09/2013 5:46:18 PM PDT by Liberty Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

Oath .. or not?

What difference does it make? (ducks)


39 posted on 05/09/2013 5:48:20 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

Yes, and if she sbupoenaed to appear again, this time under oath, she will plead the 5th.


40 posted on 05/09/2013 5:53:00 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great natiorn is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson