Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ground broken for oil refinery on ND reservation
Fuel Fix ^ | May 10, 2013 | Associated Press

Posted on 05/10/2013 5:59:05 AM PDT by thackney

The Three Affiliated Tribes have broken ground for a $450 million oil refinery on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation in northwestern North Dakota

The Thunder Butte Petroleum Services Refinery will be constructed in four phases over two years. A ceremonial groundbreaking was held Wednesday, after more than a decade of planning, according to The Forum and the Minot Daily News. Construction is expected to begin in August.

“We grew up poor. We were lucky if we had a pair of clean overalls,” Tribal Chairman Tex Hall said. “But our parents made sure we went to school and got educated. They did the best they could for us. They didn’t know we’d have this oil and gas resource, but now we do. It’s our responsibility to manage it, and we are.”

The refinery is named for one of the most sacred buttes on the reservation, according to Hall.

(Excerpt) Read more at fuelfix.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: North Dakota
KEYWORDS: americanindians; energy; refinery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: thackney

So, how long would it take to get approval of a “real” refinery? It’s been 25 or 30 years since a new “real” refinery has been put up. The existing ones just keep trying to upgrade and produce despite the ever increasing BS from the epa and enviro-wak-a-doodles. Summer blend my butt.


21 posted on 05/10/2013 6:56:48 AM PDT by rktman (BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]



FR is funded solely by the freedom loving folks
who love and use it.

WE are Free Republic!!!
Please Contribute Today!

22 posted on 05/10/2013 7:02:12 AM PDT by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

I guess the “no new refineries” claim doesn’t mean anything to me. In those same 3 decades, we have expanded and upgraded our existing refinery to the point where the average output per refinery has doubled from 59.4 MBPD to 120.3 MBPD.

Number and Capacity of Petroleum Refineries
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pnp_cap1_dcu_nus_a.htm

We now produce more refined product than the country uses. Consequently we import more crude oil than we need and export the surplus refined products helping our trade balance keeping more jobs in the US.

At this point, building additional refineries will only result in either exporting more refined product, or shutting down existing refineries. We do not have a shortage of refineries for the total US.


23 posted on 05/10/2013 7:04:27 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rktman
So, how long would it take to get approval of a “real” refinery?

I have an understanding of the oil/gas industry. What you are asking about is forecasting politics.

I suggest asking someone with a more appropriate skill set:

The existing ones just keep trying to upgrade and produce despite the ever increasing BS from the epa and enviro-wak-a-doodles.

They do more than try. In those same 3 decades we have doubled the output of the average US refinery.

24 posted on 05/10/2013 7:08:47 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Ah yes. The Great Karnak. By try, I meant dealing with the epa. An arduous task for sure.


25 posted on 05/10/2013 7:14:30 AM PDT by rktman (BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I used to work for a company that mainly designed refinery units, specializing in the heavy oil end but also did complete refineries for places like Brazil and other countries.

The cost of adding 250 MBPD to an existing refinery of the same size was about 40% the total cost of building a 250 MBPD refinery on a completely empty location. The infrastructure to support the increased output is so much cheaper than building it from scratch.


26 posted on 05/10/2013 7:17:35 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

This reservation is different then the ones I’ve seen in So Dal. It’s cleaner and you do not see the alcoholism of the lakota.
Most of the people here have jobs.


27 posted on 05/10/2013 7:30:12 AM PDT by South Dakota (shut up and build a bakken pipe line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Roger that. I worked at KSC and we constantly had to mod and upgrade the LOX and LH2 storage/supply facilities. Sure beat the cost of building new ones. Especially the dewars for storage. Saturn program era builds. But they worked.


28 posted on 05/10/2013 7:36:24 AM PDT by rktman (BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Especially if you were starting with a refinery that was a few decades old. During the expansion, related upgrades on the existing might lower the new unit down in size for the same total throughput.

For example:
An existing older 250 MBPD plant could be upgraded to 300 MBPD plant and only build a 200 MPD new expansion. At the same time, the expansions could target more valuable fuels than what was the greatest profit several decades ago.

It is certainly more complicated than that, but it does help explain the point why expansions can be much cheaper than new grassroot construction.

29 posted on 05/10/2013 7:47:30 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: struggle

LOL!!!


30 posted on 05/10/2013 7:55:36 AM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Waiting for the Enviro tribe to come out claiming it is being built on “sacred Indian burial grounds” in an attempt to stop it!


31 posted on 05/10/2013 7:58:27 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (When someone burns a cross on your lawn, the best firehose is an AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Trespassing EPA inspectors will be scalped on sight...


32 posted on 05/10/2013 8:27:48 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

It’s taken awhile, but it looks like one tribe is getting the last laugh on those who put their ancestors on that reservation.


33 posted on 05/10/2013 8:28:58 AM PDT by TheDon (Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

This will be another financial boondoggle and probable environmental disaster as well.

The tribal government is corrupt, inept, capricious, unaccountable.

It’s like the BIA “Cobell” settlement of the past several years and the more recent Pigford reparations case.

The government backs a preferred status group, bends rules, pours money in, then the whole thing blows up.

Fingers are pointed, charges of bigotry and discrimination are levelled—and taxpayers are forced to pay for the failure and subsequent cleanup as well.


34 posted on 05/10/2013 8:52:36 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thanks for the information. I think the “no new refineries” thing is that the environmentalists have been delaying every new refinery and forcing the improvement of existing facilities. That is good that the latter occurred, but it certainly wasn’t the outcome they wanted.


35 posted on 05/10/2013 10:22:34 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dryfus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: thackney

And produced cleaner fuels, too.


36 posted on 05/10/2013 11:12:58 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Ouch !


37 posted on 04/23/2014 6:49:53 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Drilling and building refineries....should have been done decades ago.


38 posted on 04/23/2014 6:52:01 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson