Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC's Jon Karl: 'No evidence Hillary Clinton was aware' of Benghazi revisions
Politico ^ | 5/10/13 | DYLAN BYERS

Posted on 05/10/2013 11:04:45 AM PDT by neverdem

Today's blockbuster ABC News report about White House and State Dept. involvement in revising the CIA’s Benghazi talking points has provided Republicans with new talking points in their effort to discredit former Sec. of State Hillary Clinton. But Jonathan Karl, the ABC News White House correspondent who landed the scoop, says not so fast.

The emails obtained by Karl show that State Dept. spokesman Victoria Nuland raised objections to a paragraph in the talking points mentioning threats from extremists linked to Al Qaeda. When a round of revisions did not satisfy her concerns, she wrote back: “These changes don’t resolve all of my issues or those of my building's leadership."

In that reference to the "building's leadership," some see a reference to Sec. Clinton. But Karl says that to date, no such evidence exists.

"There's no evidence that I've seen that Hillary Clinton was aware of what was going on, or in any way tried to direct what was in these talking points," Karl told POLITICO on Friday morning. "But that sentence is certainly open to interpretation, and you can guarantee it is going to seized on by Republicans for a long time, because ultimately the leadership of that building is Hillary Clinton."

Republicans have been fighting to keep the Benghazi story alive for months, and the right-wing blogosphere has made it their r'aison d'etre. Despite front page reports in the New York Times and scoops from reporters like Karl, conservatives accuse the mainstream media of failing to adequately investigate the story.

Those accusations are likely to subside this weekend in the wake of Karl's report (and that of The Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes), which comes on the heels of Wednesday's 'emotional' testimony from three State Dept. officials. Benghazi is now driving the news cycle and -- as my colleagues Glenn Thrush and Maggie Haberman pointed out on Thursday -- Hillary Clinton is once again fair-game for critics.

The Sunday shows will be almost entirely dedicated to the issue: ABC's "This Week," will feature interviews with Sens. John McCain and Jack Reed, and Gen. James Cartwright, retired Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will join the roundtable. CBS's "Face The Nation" will feature interviews with former Sec. of Defense Robert Gates and Sens. Dick Durbin and Kelly Ayotte. NBC's "Meet The Press" will have exclusive interviews with House Oversight Committee Chair Darrell Issa and Senate Intelligence Chair Dianne Feinstein. 

But where the story goes after Sunday is anyone's guess.

"I have no idea how long this story will go on, but what is clear after this week is that there are still legitimate questions to be asked, and there's also going to be a political story regarding Hillary Clinton," Karl told POLITICO. "The story clearly has legs -- for how long, I just don't know."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abc; benghazi; hillaryclinton; jonathonkarl; soshillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-80 next last

1 posted on 05/10/2013 11:04:46 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Well, he works for ABC — he can’t go too far towards the truth.


2 posted on 05/10/2013 11:06:37 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Well then maybe the House needs to actually put Hillary Clinton UNDER OATH THIS TIME, and ask her what she knew, when she knew it, and other relevant questions. Stunning to think the Republican Leadership is so gutless they let her “testify” without, you know, making her testimony biding by swearing her in. Pathetic.


3 posted on 05/10/2013 11:07:16 AM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They have found their scapegoats now.....Nuland and probably Rhodes.

Someone is going to have a nice fat off shore bank account to ‘retire’ to very soon.


4 posted on 05/10/2013 11:07:20 AM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Once again, the "Smartest Woman In The World"tm claims to not know what is going on around her.

Obviously she is the prime contender to fill Zero's shoes.

5 posted on 05/10/2013 11:07:47 AM PDT by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

yet once again, their usual attempted excuse...
we weren’t evil, we were just grossly incompetent

OK.
let them be “non-evil” (if anyone can believe that!?). OK.

I still want competent people in government now!


6 posted on 05/10/2013 11:07:52 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
“There’s no evidence that I’ve seen that Hillary Clinton was aware of what was going on, or in any way tried to direct what was in these talking points,” Karl told POLITICO ...”

Apparently, he looked in the wrong places.....typical MSM cover up for cankles....

7 posted on 05/10/2013 11:07:59 AM PDT by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Oh yea...and oral sex is not sex either. These Marxists are incredibly good at propaganda, deceit, lies, and manipulation.


8 posted on 05/10/2013 11:08:04 AM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Of course not. She’s just a useful idiot. And a criminally negligent incompetent communist bitch, just like her idiot boss!


9 posted on 05/10/2013 11:09:09 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Well, of course. The reasons why people use phrases like “my building’s leadership” is specifically to avoid putting names on the record.

All paths in this case lead to Hillary Clinton. I hope and believe she isn’t going to take the fall on this one for Obama — if she is convinced that her goose is cooked, then I don’t see her wanting to go down alone.


10 posted on 05/10/2013 11:09:39 AM PDT by kevkrom (Obama: less class than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If she was unaware then she is the most incompetent government employee in the last 250 years.

She is supposed to be the smartest woman in the world, but nobody can possibly be that stupid.

The MSM is an active participant in the biggest scandal and cover up in history.


11 posted on 05/10/2013 11:10:25 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

We have two choices: either Hillary intentionally lied to the American people to protect her reputation, or Hillary is shockingly oblivious to a story that should at the time have been the center of her life. Either way, it’s a disqualifying flaw.


12 posted on 05/10/2013 11:11:04 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

OK let me understand this, She is on the phone with Mr. Hicks at 2:00am and he says its terrorism. So she forgot that when she saw the talking points? Must be that fall.


13 posted on 05/10/2013 11:11:22 AM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“There’s no evidence that I’ve seen that Hillary Clinton was aware of what was going on, or in any way tried to direct what was in these talking points,”

A. She’s a liar
B. She’s an incompetent leader
C. Both A and B are true


14 posted on 05/10/2013 11:11:38 AM PDT by ryan71 (The Second American Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
ABC's Jon Karl: 'No evidence Hillary Clinton was aware' of Benghazi revisions

Good grief. How might Hillary herself put it ...?

I think that I ... uh ... the reports that you provide to us really require the willing suspension of disbelief.

15 posted on 05/10/2013 11:12:01 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“There’s no evidence that I’ve seen that Hillary Clinton was aware of what was going on, or in any way tried to direct what was in these talking points,”
++++++++++++++++++++
And why should she have? The only things that were at stake were her future political career and her plans to succeed Obama as President of the United States. Let the staff deal it. Nothing to see here. Time to move on.


16 posted on 05/10/2013 11:12:42 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (If I had a tag line this is where you would find it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

As I said. Criminally negligent incompetent bitch.


17 posted on 05/10/2013 11:12:53 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Sounds like Jon Karl got a call from Chicago.


18 posted on 05/10/2013 11:12:58 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends







It's vitally important to Keep FR Alive.
ALL Contributions are for "THIS" Quarter's Expenses!
PLEASE MAKE YOUR DONATION TODAY!

19 posted on 05/10/2013 11:13:01 AM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antonico

It’s not gutless. It’s complicit.

Prople on the intel committees knew that Al Quida was hired to guard an American Embassy. The rest of the world could go to a freaking web page and see an AQ battle flag on the Brigade’s home[age. The Intel people couldn’t? Please.

We don’t want to admit that ‘our’ people helped this disaster. But they did. The GOP sat on it’s ass for months and let the dems drive the media narrative. The RNC refused to run election ads on it. Romney refused to fight it out in the debates.

That’s the reality folks. We are sold out. Completely.


20 posted on 05/10/2013 11:14:07 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

She will have her minions say she was not aware of the revisions to the talking points before they were repeated to all and sundry. But since she was on the phone with her staff in Libya, she certainly knew the talking points were incorrect, and yet she herself repeated them.

She can’t get out of this one. She says she didn’t know who changed the talking points, but she knew they were lies and she repeated them anyway.

She needs to be served a subpoena. She has a few more questions to answer.


21 posted on 05/10/2013 11:14:52 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

maybe send that direct quote to him and aks him how on earth he couldn’t find any evidence when you foudn it with just a minute or two searching and ask him what he gets for a salary becvause it’;s obvious he doesn’t desefrve what he’s getting


22 posted on 05/10/2013 11:17:52 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

HOW ABOUT THE ATTACK IN PROGRESS?

WHICH THEY WATCHED LIVE FROM DRONES?


23 posted on 05/10/2013 11:22:03 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antonico

The name of the law firm that Herself, the Cold and Joyless, once worked with, should have been changed to Waffle, Straddle & Backfill. Herself learned her fine points of legal argument (deny, obfuscate, use emotion in place of logic, and ignore any direct challenges) while serving there, yet was never known to provide any legal opinion worthy of the definition.

The only reason some people study law is to find the loopholes.


24 posted on 05/10/2013 11:22:32 AM PDT by alloysteel (If you want to see the true measure of a man, watch how he treats his inferiors, not his equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

One can only wonder why someone in the GOP/conservative media doesn’t create a website updated to that very thing. Lies by media directly countered in near realtime.

And names in Bold.

I’d think it would be popular and impossible to defend against. Perhaps they just don’t want to.


25 posted on 05/10/2013 11:22:43 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Stop these sociopaths!

FR is funded solely by the freedom loving folks
who love and use it.

WE are Free Republic!!!
Please Contribute Today!

26 posted on 05/10/2013 11:25:10 AM PDT by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Refuting media lies...

Perhaps they feel the effort would be too labor intensive...

27 posted on 05/10/2013 11:26:32 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

28 posted on 05/10/2013 11:27:04 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

Job security in these economically uncertain times....


29 posted on 05/10/2013 11:27:39 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

That fact needs to be repeated over and over.


30 posted on 05/10/2013 11:32:21 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

To summarize what Limbaugh has been saying fir days:

At about 5pm eastern time in Washington, we’re told that Obama met separately with Hillary Clinton and Leon Panetta telling each they needed to handle the attack in Benghazi.

Neither Hillary Clinton nor Panetta had the authority to order the military into action. And, conversely, neither could legally order the military to “stand down” during an attack on sovereign territory.

Obama’s whereabouts after 5 pm are undocumented. We are to believe Obama was having fish tacos and watching TV...while a terrorist attack was occurring on the 10 year anniversary of 9-11.


31 posted on 05/10/2013 11:33:56 AM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

do these media outlets ever stop defending their cult and actually do their job.

SHe is the top of the dept, she is hands on, and now we’re supposed to think she had no clue any of this was done and how about after Rice went on and Clinton heard about this, ?

Did she do anything, or what does it matter in their minds, it’s all about getting Obama elected and getting Clinton elected.

Politics and party before country and truth, is the todays media slogan


32 posted on 05/10/2013 11:33:57 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

When Benghazi happened, my first impression was that Hillary was strictly covering her own considerable rear end, that she knew what was being done, but separated herself from it to the extent possible. And then she refused to go on TV and present the cover story, thus Susan Rice was picked for that job and was not in a position to refuse.

She probably did know about the rewritten talking points, but was already heading for the tall grass, or for the wine tastings in Australia.

And she’s been distancing herself from the entire episode to the extent possible ever since. And I wonder if she really intended to resign as S of S when she did?


33 posted on 05/10/2013 11:34:02 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Hey Jon!

ALL of the evidence makes it absolutely clear that Hillary KNEW the Benghazi attack was conducted by terrorists!

Because THAT is exactly what she was told at 2:00 a.m. the very night of the attack, by the man who was, at that moment, head diplomat in Libya.


34 posted on 05/10/2013 11:35:15 AM PDT by G Larry (Darkness Hates the Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Nothing the Always Broadcast Communism (ABC) network does surprises me. Johnathan Karl committed a random act of journalism, so now he has to bury it under a hundred lies to maintain his creds with the MSM hive.
35 posted on 05/10/2013 11:38:52 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

When the boss doesn’t have to take responsibility, the government is too big. What better example.


36 posted on 05/10/2013 11:41:01 AM PDT by pacpam (action=consequence and applies in all cases - friend of victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
— Then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Jan. 23, 2013:

“I wasn’t involved in the talking points process.... As I understand it, as I’ve been told, it was a typical interagency process where staff, including from the State Department, all participated, to try to come up with whatever was going to be made publicly available, and it was an intelligence product.”

“With all due respect,the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?”—Hillary Clinton


37 posted on 05/10/2013 11:47:13 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ('How empty and dead' were they to let Chris Stevens, one of them , die for 'Obama-Clinton fiction?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They may be correct.

This seems to have Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett’s MO all over it.

Would the insider circle (Obama(s), Jarrett, Holder, Rice, Brennan...) let any of the true career politicians manage this sensitive situation? Especially one who has goals for 2016?

Lets face it. Most of the career politicians - including Hillary - in this administration have been window dressing.


38 posted on 05/10/2013 11:50:12 AM PDT by bluecat6 ("All non-denial denials. They doubt our ancestry, but they don't say the story isn't accurate. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
and you can guarantee it is going to seized on by Republicans for a long time

Now, why do you suppose investigative journalists wouldn't also seize that and try to get to the bottom of the truth?

39 posted on 05/10/2013 11:52:07 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Ok, so then prosecute her for incompetence...


40 posted on 05/10/2013 11:52:42 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Maybe one of us need to do it!


41 posted on 05/10/2013 11:52:46 AM PDT by boxlunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
But we have Sullivan in the mix...top guy from State who was leading that Saturday WH meeting according to Stephen Hayes.

Nuland wasn't even there.

42 posted on 05/10/2013 11:53:58 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

How ridiculous, she went out and repeated the lie in the TPs herself and yet did not know where they came from?


43 posted on 05/10/2013 11:54:52 AM PDT by CityCenter (No matter how good your PR is, you can't outsmart the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Good point.

They are going to try and place the blame on low information staffers....bank on it.


44 posted on 05/10/2013 11:59:46 AM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
ABC's Jon Karl: 'No evidence Hillary Clinton was aware' of Benghazi revisions

Gotta be one of Politico's most dumbed-down headlines ever. No evidence she WASN'T aware either, Jon. So, this is a news story?
45 posted on 05/10/2013 12:04:33 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CityCenter
How ridiculous, she went out and repeated the lie in the TPs herself and yet did not know where they came from?

Yep; that's her job description alright. Just lie part of the time and obfuscate the remainder.

The Dr. Gregory House' quote pertains to all the people in the entire Obama administration: "EVERYBODY LIES!"

Everyone out front for sure.
46 posted on 05/10/2013 12:11:22 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: illiac

“There’s no evidence that I’ve seen that Hillary Clinton was aware of what was going on, or in any way tried to direct what was in these talking points,”

Just like she wasn’t aware that Bill was getting blow jobs from Monica.

So she was too stupid to be complicit... she’s only guilty of criminal incompetence.


47 posted on 05/10/2013 12:11:58 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Revolting cat!

“allegedly” no evidence.


48 posted on 05/10/2013 12:15:19 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

My impression is that Sullivan was a high info staffer close to Hillary.


49 posted on 05/10/2013 12:17:57 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

My impression is that Sullivan was a high info staffer close to Hillary.


50 posted on 05/10/2013 12:18:18 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson