It's vitally important to Keep FR Alive.
ALL Contributions are for "THIS" Quarter's Expenses!
PLEASE MAKE YOUR DONATION TODAY!
Posted on 05/10/2013 11:04:45 AM PDT by neverdem
Well, he works for ABC — he can’t go too far towards the truth.
Well then maybe the House needs to actually put Hillary Clinton UNDER OATH THIS TIME, and ask her what she knew, when she knew it, and other relevant questions. Stunning to think the Republican Leadership is so gutless they let her “testify” without, you know, making her testimony biding by swearing her in. Pathetic.
They have found their scapegoats now.....Nuland and probably Rhodes.
Someone is going to have a nice fat off shore bank account to ‘retire’ to very soon.
Obviously she is the prime contender to fill Zero's shoes.
yet once again, their usual attempted excuse...
we weren’t evil, we were just grossly incompetent
OK.
let them be “non-evil” (if anyone can believe that!?). OK.
I still want competent people in government now!
Apparently, he looked in the wrong places.....typical MSM cover up for cankles....
Oh yea...and oral sex is not sex either. These Marxists are incredibly good at propaganda, deceit, lies, and manipulation.
Of course not. She’s just a useful idiot. And a criminally negligent incompetent communist bitch, just like her idiot boss!
Well, of course. The reasons why people use phrases like “my building’s leadership” is specifically to avoid putting names on the record.
All paths in this case lead to Hillary Clinton. I hope and believe she isn’t going to take the fall on this one for Obama — if she is convinced that her goose is cooked, then I don’t see her wanting to go down alone.
If she was unaware then she is the most incompetent government employee in the last 250 years.
She is supposed to be the smartest woman in the world, but nobody can possibly be that stupid.
The MSM is an active participant in the biggest scandal and cover up in history.
We have two choices: either Hillary intentionally lied to the American people to protect her reputation, or Hillary is shockingly oblivious to a story that should at the time have been the center of her life. Either way, it’s a disqualifying flaw.
OK let me understand this, She is on the phone with Mr. Hicks at 2:00am and he says its terrorism. So she forgot that when she saw the talking points? Must be that fall.
“There’s no evidence that I’ve seen that Hillary Clinton was aware of what was going on, or in any way tried to direct what was in these talking points,”
A. She’s a liar
B. She’s an incompetent leader
C. Both A and B are true
Good grief. How might Hillary herself put it ...?
“There’s no evidence that I’ve seen that Hillary Clinton was aware of what was going on, or in any way tried to direct what was in these talking points,”
++++++++++++++++++++
And why should she have? The only things that were at stake were her future political career and her plans to succeed Obama as President of the United States. Let the staff deal it. Nothing to see here. Time to move on.
As I said. Criminally negligent incompetent bitch.
Sounds like Jon Karl got a call from Chicago.
It’s not gutless. It’s complicit.
Prople on the intel committees knew that Al Quida was hired to guard an American Embassy. The rest of the world could go to a freaking web page and see an AQ battle flag on the Brigade’s home[age. The Intel people couldn’t? Please.
We don’t want to admit that ‘our’ people helped this disaster. But they did. The GOP sat on it’s ass for months and let the dems drive the media narrative. The RNC refused to run election ads on it. Romney refused to fight it out in the debates.
That’s the reality folks. We are sold out. Completely.
She will have her minions say she was not aware of the revisions to the talking points before they were repeated to all and sundry. But since she was on the phone with her staff in Libya, she certainly knew the talking points were incorrect, and yet she herself repeated them.
She can’t get out of this one. She says she didn’t know who changed the talking points, but she knew they were lies and she repeated them anyway.
She needs to be served a subpoena. She has a few more questions to answer.
maybe send that direct quote to him and aks him how on earth he couldn’t find any evidence when you foudn it with just a minute or two searching and ask him what he gets for a salary becvause it’;s obvious he doesn’t desefrve what he’s getting
HOW ABOUT THE ATTACK IN PROGRESS?
WHICH THEY WATCHED LIVE FROM DRONES?
The name of the law firm that Herself, the Cold and Joyless, once worked with, should have been changed to Waffle, Straddle & Backfill. Herself learned her fine points of legal argument (deny, obfuscate, use emotion in place of logic, and ignore any direct challenges) while serving there, yet was never known to provide any legal opinion worthy of the definition.
The only reason some people study law is to find the loopholes.
One can only wonder why someone in the GOP/conservative media doesn’t create a website updated to that very thing. Lies by media directly countered in near realtime.
And names in Bold.
I’d think it would be popular and impossible to defend against. Perhaps they just don’t want to.
Perhaps they feel the effort would be too labor intensive...
Job security in these economically uncertain times....
That fact needs to be repeated over and over.
To summarize what Limbaugh has been saying fir days:
At about 5pm eastern time in Washington, we’re told that Obama met separately with Hillary Clinton and Leon Panetta telling each they needed to handle the attack in Benghazi.
Neither Hillary Clinton nor Panetta had the authority to order the military into action. And, conversely, neither could legally order the military to “stand down” during an attack on sovereign territory.
Obama’s whereabouts after 5 pm are undocumented. We are to believe Obama was having fish tacos and watching TV...while a terrorist attack was occurring on the 10 year anniversary of 9-11.
do these media outlets ever stop defending their cult and actually do their job.
SHe is the top of the dept, she is hands on, and now we’re supposed to think she had no clue any of this was done and how about after Rice went on and Clinton heard about this, ?
Did she do anything, or what does it matter in their minds, it’s all about getting Obama elected and getting Clinton elected.
Politics and party before country and truth, is the todays media slogan
When Benghazi happened, my first impression was that Hillary was strictly covering her own considerable rear end, that she knew what was being done, but separated herself from it to the extent possible. And then she refused to go on TV and present the cover story, thus Susan Rice was picked for that job and was not in a position to refuse.
She probably did know about the rewritten talking points, but was already heading for the tall grass, or for the wine tastings in Australia.
And she’s been distancing herself from the entire episode to the extent possible ever since. And I wonder if she really intended to resign as S of S when she did?
Hey Jon!
ALL of the evidence makes it absolutely clear that Hillary KNEW the Benghazi attack was conducted by terrorists!
Because THAT is exactly what she was told at 2:00 a.m. the very night of the attack, by the man who was, at that moment, head diplomat in Libya.
When the boss doesn’t have to take responsibility, the government is too big. What better example.
“I wasn’t involved in the talking points process.... As I understand it, as I’ve been told, it was a typical interagency process where staff, including from the State Department, all participated, to try to come up with whatever was going to be made publicly available, and it was an intelligence product.”
“With all due respect,the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?”—Hillary Clinton
They may be correct.
This seems to have Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett’s MO all over it.
Would the insider circle (Obama(s), Jarrett, Holder, Rice, Brennan...) let any of the true career politicians manage this sensitive situation? Especially one who has goals for 2016?
Lets face it. Most of the career politicians - including Hillary - in this administration have been window dressing.
Now, why do you suppose investigative journalists wouldn't also seize that and try to get to the bottom of the truth?
Ok, so then prosecute her for incompetence...
Maybe one of us need to do it!
Nuland wasn't even there.
How ridiculous, she went out and repeated the lie in the TPs herself and yet did not know where they came from?
Good point.
They are going to try and place the blame on low information staffers....bank on it.
“There’s no evidence that I’ve seen that Hillary Clinton was aware of what was going on, or in any way tried to direct what was in these talking points,”
Just like she wasn’t aware that Bill was getting blow jobs from Monica.
So she was too stupid to be complicit... she’s only guilty of criminal incompetence.
“allegedly” no evidence.
My impression is that Sullivan was a high info staffer close to Hillary.
My impression is that Sullivan was a high info staffer close to Hillary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.