Yup.
Stevens was heading up an immense covert arms smuggling scheme that forms the core of a US effort to aid in bringing the Arab Spring to Syria.
This will culminate in a Caliphate ruled by the Muslim Brotherhood.
That’s why Obama’s Cairo Speech was titled, “A New Beginning”. That’s why Hillary’s GF is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. That’s why US intel is headed up by DCI Brennan, who IS A MUSLIM and got the little-known goods on Morocco Bomber’s passport info:
The US left observes tension between the Muslim street and their various corrupt but secular leaders, and they have decided to simply throw those leaders out. And this way, they tell themselves, we’ll be reallllly good friends with the new fundamentalist center of power in the Middle East, namely the Muslim Brotherhood.
There will be a Caliphate, and they’ll be OK with their buds, the USA.
We just have to throw out all our old allies, the thinking goes, and then we’ll have a new set of reliable friends.
So reliable they can prevent an attack on a US compound...?
THIS WILL NOT END WELL.
(sorta like Fast & Furious)
That’s what I really don’t understand.
Is this fury about the talking points crap, really about the talking points?
Or, is this stage one to try to find out why a diplomatic sub-consulate in Benghazi had such a large contingent of CIA operatives in an annex doing what??? What were they doing in Benghazi that couldn’t have been done in the US headquarters CIA staff annex in Tripoli???
How many rockets do you need to sweep off the desert of Libya, to send to Turkey, to get into Syria???
Why aren’t our intrepid congress critters focused on the real end-game??