Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRS admits targeting conservatives for tax scrutiny in 2012 election
washington post ^ | 5/10/2013 | By Zachary A. Goldfarb and Karen Tumulty

Posted on 05/11/2013 5:28:27 AM PDT by tobyhill

The Internal Revenue Service on Friday apologized for targeting groups with “tea party” or “patriot” in their names, confirming long-standing accusations by some conservatives that their applications for tax-exempt status were being improperly delayed and scrutinized.

Lois G. Lerner, the IRS official who oversees tax-exempt groups, said the “absolutely inappropriate” actions by “front-line people” were not driven by partisan motives.

Rather, Lerner said, they were a misguided effort to come up with an efficient means of dealing with a flood of applications from organizations seeking ­tax-exempt status between 2010 and 2012.

During that period, about 75 groups were selected for extra inquiry — including burdensome questionnaires and, in some cases, improper requests for the names of their donors — simply because of the words in their names, she said in a conference call with reporters.

They constituted about one-quarter of the 300 groups who were flagged for additional analysis by employees of the IRS tax-exempt unit’s main office in Cincinnati.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: irs; loislerner; oldnews; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills

1 posted on 05/11/2013 5:28:27 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

One word - corruption.


2 posted on 05/11/2013 5:29:59 AM PDT by Jack Hammer (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

“...the absolutely inappropriate actions by front-line people were not driven by partisan motives.”

Yeah, right.

That makes it all nice and cute, everyone apologizes, the misery inflicted on law-abiding citizens is disregarded, and everyone goes happily on his way.

Isn’t that sweet and airy and light-hearted.

/s/

IMHO


3 posted on 05/11/2013 5:36:02 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Resignations, then jail time.


4 posted on 05/11/2013 5:44:25 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Pi$$ed off yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
So, are we to believe some low level IRS employee developed the questionnaire that made it virtually impossible for a conservative organization to apply for tax exempt status?

Is that why the last time I called the IRS to see if my tax guy filed for my extension it took calling two separate numbers, painstaking navigation through voice menu hell, and an hour and fifteen minutes to speak with a live person? The lower level guys were creating forms for conservative groups to fill out and therefore could not answer the phone???

5 posted on 05/11/2013 5:44:50 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

The amusing thing here, is that you could have called your organization ‘Cat Lovers of America’, whose only theme was Tea-Party activities, and they would have passed you on with no issues. A month later, you change your name to ‘Tea Party America’, and any movement by IRS would have been strictly illegal at that point.

I will say this....several individuals need to be let go by IRS. If they don’t take movement, then Congress needs to set up a committee and unseat each employee.


6 posted on 05/11/2013 5:45:43 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I personally think the admission and apology were an attempt to distract from Benghazi scandal but the white crib underestimated how serious it really is and now they have two major scandals to mismanage.


7 posted on 05/11/2013 5:46:04 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
During that period, about 75 groups were selected for extra inquiry — including burdensome questionnaires and, in some cases, improper requests for the names of their donors — simply because of the words in their names, she said in a conference call with reporters.

Substitute "color of their skin" for "words in their names" and it will become clear why this was so offensive.

8 posted on 05/11/2013 5:48:32 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

So why would you have anything to fear from your government?


9 posted on 05/11/2013 5:49:26 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I know I’m not the first one here to note the astonishing coincidence that the IRS suddenly came clean on this just two days after the Benghazi hearings. But I think it’s worth repeating — we have seen over and over that Obama always has something bright and shiny he can throw in the air when the news gets a little rough for him.


10 posted on 05/11/2013 6:15:29 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Nah—just a dumb mistake. Nothing like what Nixon did. :)


11 posted on 05/11/2013 6:16:13 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

WP actually has an editorial board post today condemning this IRS stuff and calling for investigations. I was shocked when I saw it last night.


12 posted on 05/11/2013 6:28:07 AM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Not cute, not funny. It is voter intimidation, harassment, and unreasonable search & seizure. I say prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.


13 posted on 05/11/2013 6:33:02 AM PDT by EBH (Warning this person is a Catholic, Tea Party Patriot, and owns a copy of Atlas Shurgged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
IRS admits targeting conservatives for tax scrutiny in 2012 election

One word:

Accountability.
Punishment.

OK; Two words.

14 posted on 05/11/2013 6:45:07 AM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SC_Pete
Nah—just a dumb mistake. Nothing like what Nixon did. :)

People died.
What does it matter?

Office break-in?
Give 'em the chair!!

Got it.

15 posted on 05/11/2013 6:47:10 AM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The IRS has now proven to thinking Americans that it is an evil, rotten organization is league with this illegal administration. It deserves not only the contempt of Americans, but it must be starved to death. Civil disobedience must be directed against these muggers who abscond with our earnings and use them against this nation. Calling their spoils ‘taxpayer money’ is an insult to anyone with a functioning brain. (This, of course, excludes the idiotic Biden.)

The Obama administration has used the IRS as a political weapon. “The IRS may claim that it is ‘sorry,’ but given the damage that has been done, their apology is not accepted,” said Niger Innis, Chief Strategist for TheTeaParty.net.


16 posted on 05/11/2013 6:55:50 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH; theothercheek; Red Steel; David; GreatOne; Spaulding; jazminerose; AJFavish; holdonnow; ...
Here's a question primarily directed to the litigation attorneys out there who do constitutional cases. (Input from anyone is welcomed.)

How about the possibility of the Tea Party and other offended groups filing a civil suit in federal court against the IRS for violation of their First Amendment and federal statutory rights (Bivens action)? What kind of damages might be expected? How would the attendant publicity play out?

Seems to me that there would be a great reservoir of popular sympathy for the cause of the plaintiffs in such a case.

17 posted on 05/11/2013 7:35:51 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
re: ' "The Internal Revenue Service on Friday apologized for targeting groups with “tea party” or “patriot” in their names"...

"patriot -one who loves his country" Webster`s dictionary 1887

The Obummer administration has now redefined the term "patriot" to mean the opposite of its definition.

We now define the Obummer administration as definitely anti-American for its very usage of the word "patriot" and its attempt to redefine it.

These SOB bastards will be defeated by the patriots.

18 posted on 05/11/2013 7:49:31 AM PDT by bunkerhill7 (("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Last year, the NY Times editorial board praised the IRS for targeting conservative groups.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/opinion/the-irs-does-its-job.html?src=tp&_r=0


19 posted on 05/11/2013 7:53:01 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

Go figure....the old grey whore.


20 posted on 05/11/2013 7:57:33 AM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: publius911

When the end justifies the means, POWER is the ultimate good. Murder is prohibited in the Ten Commandments—but to the LEFT, the Bible is a target of ridicule and derision. Murder is excusable if it promotes SOCIAL JUSTICE (read control by the elitist oligarchy). To the LEFT, the ultimate damnable crime was Nixon’s—that is, interfering with the inexorable dismantling of the United States. Resistance is a crime; murder is not.


21 posted on 05/11/2013 8:06:06 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

This government is the enemy of the American people; that is why they are stockpiling ammunition.


22 posted on 05/11/2013 8:57:51 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; sf4dubya; GregNH; Seizethecarp; Ladysforest; Brown Deer; ...
From the New York Slimes editorial linked to in post # 19:

The I.R.S. must not flinch from its duty to enforce the tax code and root out political operatives who are abusing the law and conning taxpayers and voters.

How sanctimonious for the Slimes to say that!!! Fact is that the large majority of "political operatives who are abusing the law and conning taxpayers and voters" are on the Left! But everyone knows that those individuals and groups will be getting their IRS approval from the Obama administration with no questions asked.

Of course, the 'Rats know how to play this game of harassing the political opposition with the IRS really well. It's in their DNA. It likely started with the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration where one of the most prominent and wealthiest adversaries of the New Deal, publisher Moses Annenberg of the Philadelphia Inquirer, was locked up for a number of years. (Even the WaPo mentions FDR as historical background for the posted story.)

Yet the 'Rats have the gall to claim that they are the party of civil liberties!

23 posted on 05/11/2013 9:46:21 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2372528584001/irs-enemies-list-agency-admits-to-targeting-conservatives/?playlist_id=86924


24 posted on 05/11/2013 10:47:14 AM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/america-live/index.html#http://video.foxnews.com/v/2371769430001/irs-apologizes-for-targeting-conservative-groups/?playlist_id=87651


25 posted on 05/11/2013 10:53:19 AM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson