Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: melsec

I admit I was a bit skeptical of how far up the chain this went if it went beyond the IRS at all, but after reading things this AM, I think this could now be even bigger than Benghazi, and where Benghazi was an alteration of a talking point which is not criminal, this is.

Someone high up in the IRS requested this scrutiny...who was it and why is the key point to be addressed as soon as possible. I would bet whomever is must be a registered Dem and probably big Obum supporter. Probably listens to MSNBC and NBC also.

I remember the IRS abuses of the 70’s which were investigated to the max and these deserve nothing less. For instance they determined which person in IRS was providing tax returns to the white house and they also ran to the ground cash which was generated off company books for bribes and also why audits did not uncover the bribe money for years.


19 posted on 05/13/2013 4:51:31 AM PDT by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Mouton
Hold on... where Benghazi was an alteration of a talking point which is not criminal...

/\.

What about the four D-E-A-D Americans...those are not speed bumps!!! Those are graves and families with dead sons!

22 posted on 05/13/2013 4:57:56 AM PDT by ptsal (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Mouton
Someone high up in the IRS requested this scrutiny...who was it and why is the key point to be addressed as soon as possible. I would bet whomever is must be a registered Dem and probably big Obum supporter. Probably listens to MSNBC and NBC also.

High up in the IRS? It may be even higher--possibly as high as President Obama. In short, this is abuse of power at a truly frightening level.

27 posted on 05/13/2013 5:01:54 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Mouton

I’m mainly saying don’t expect your government to do it for you. This will tale protests court case etc to truly get it in the light of day!


47 posted on 05/13/2013 6:00:49 AM PDT by melsec (Once a Jolly Swagman camped by a Billabong....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Mouton

About altering talking points not being criminal...

These talking points weren’t created for Susan Rice. She used them on tv, but they were created to present to Congress as the regime’s word on Benghazi at that point. Probably unless presented under sworn testimony, knowingly altering them until they no longer told what the regime actually knew was true wouldn’t technically fit the crime of “lying to Congress”, but in all but technicality they were done to intentionally withhold and distort information presented to Congress.

That would be impeachable when taken with other things.

Leaving the Americans to die when they could have been saved while pretending they couldn’t be, would not technically be prosecutable as the crime of murder or criminally negligent homicide because these are political people making political decisions, but would certainly be impeachable.


82 posted on 05/13/2013 6:59:58 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear..."(Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson