The only ones who will support her are the freepers who oppose EVERY GOP nominee since this sites creation.
>>The only ones who will support her are the freepers who oppose EVERY GOP nominee since this sites creation<<
Ronald Reagan would have been crucified here.
And from what I am reading (no specific links now) I was right — had so many “Conservatives” not decided they would stay home and eat worms Romney would have won. Romney was far from the best candidate but he was the FAR BETTER candidate compared to the obozo to whom we handed the election.
Allow me to correct you: It is the people here who oppose the viable candidates who actually might win a nomination and a national election in favor of the not-a-snowball’s-chance-in-hell types who pass every litmus test and then throw a temper tantrum when their guy loses. If conservatives had gotten behind Newt Gingrich early I still believe he would have exposed Barak Obama for who he is and won the election. Would he have been the perfect conservative? Of course not. But he would have taken the fight to Obama because he is not one bit concerned with wether people like him as a person or not.
2000 was a strange election year because voters were still getting over a distasteful Democrat incombant. From now on (unless the current scandal continues to metasticize), every time we nominate a “nice guy” candidate we will lose.