Skip to comments.Thank you, George W. Bush!
Posted on 05/17/2013 12:58:48 PM PDT by presidio9
Having once had the highest approval rating going back to Truman, George W. Bush left office with an appalling 34 percent approval rating the same as Jimmy Carter. He could not attend the Republican Partys 2008 National Convention for fear of hurting the partys election chances.
With the recent opening of his Presidential Library, Bushs approval rating hit a seven-year high of 47%, but that was downplayed as a trend of Americans looking on their presidents more fondly after theyve left office. And intense disapproval of Bushs handling of a number of issues, including the war in Iraq and the economy, remains.
When al-Qaida attacked America, only a few months into Bushs presidency, I had just begun my freshman year of college.
One of the things I remember most from that formative period of my life is people who had voted for Al Gore saying, Thank God George Bush is president. As time passes, I believe thats what people will remember.
AFTER 9/11, experts said it was not a question of if but when another such attack would occur. But it didnt. Thats quite astounding for a country like the US which has so many vulnerabilities, as illustrated so recently by the Boston Marathon bombings. Given massive terror attacks around the world, organized Islamic terrorists certainly havent lost interest, but instead failed in their attempts to attack the US.
They failed because president Bush committed the United States to a seemingly unwinnable war which had to be waged all over the world against not only people but against an idea itself. Bush brought the fight to the enemy with wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and military operations everywhere. Bank accounts were frozen. The Patriot Act was enacted. An ultimatum was issued to states that harbored, funded and tolerated terrorists that they were either with us or against us.
A more polite, defensive strategy of hiding behind the oceans and peeking out to launch tomahawk missiles or to conduct limited humanitarian campaigns could not have succeeded and would have emboldened the terrorists further, giving proof to their claim that America was a paper tiger. With his aggressive strategy, Bush not only reminded the world that the US is a sleeping giant enemies should think twice before awakening, but kept America safe.
President Bush also infused the War on Terror with Americas founding vision, the spread of liberty. As historian Gordon Wood has noted, in revolting against British rule, Americans saw themselves as leading a worldwide struggle for the salvation of liberty itself. In its global struggles of the past hundred years, America brought its vision of liberty to bear.
In declaring war on Germany, president Woodrow Wilson said America would fight to make the world safe for democracy.
Even before America entered World War II, FDR made America into the great arsenal of democracy. In winning the Cold War, Ronald Reagan led Americans to stare down the evil empire.
In declaring that advancing freedom would be a primary goal of the War on Terror, president Bush continued that tradition.
Believing that a region of the world which is in many ways stuck in the 7th century would embrace Anglo-American liberalism may have been overambitious, but affirming that Americans were fighting a just cause in keeping with their core principles was important for fighting the War on Terror and for how America continues to perceive itself.
As many in Israel have come to realize, a nation which is not confident of its cause will ultimately bend to pressure and make tragic mistakes. Even if it cannot rid the world of tyranny, the US is the pillar of an international order in which all nations benefit from relative stability and commerce.
If America loses the will to fight global terrorism or stand against evil empires or members of the axis of evil, the world order could crumble with disastrous consequences for us all.
In his eight years at the helm, president Bush kept America confident in its cause.
Americans may now see the Iraq War as misguided adventurism, but they still see themselves as a force for good in the world, perhaps, as their ancestors thought, the last force for good.
KEEPING WITH his world view, president Bush committed America to the cause of Israel, for which I, as an American who is now also an Israeli, am doubly thankful. I disagreed vehemently with the road map, his endorsement of the Gaza Disengagement and the Annapolis Conference, but I cant imagine a president who believes in Israels cause and who views it with friendship as genuinely as Bush did.
He rejected Arafat, the terrorist. Where the Clinton administration spoke of evenhandedness and played the unbiased referee between its ally and the terror organization it helped empower, Bush repeated over and over, Israel has the right to defend itself through the toughest years of terror Israel has ever faced.
While it may be easy to view Bushs support as the mere continuation of a process which can be traced to Johnson, Reagan or AIPAC, Bush took the special relationship to the next level. Reagan had been friendly to Israel but often chastised it, while Ford and Bush I had exhibited outright hostility. Bush virtually rid the Republican party of such hostility and replaced it with diehard support.
In solidifying Republican support for Israel and by the mere fact that Bush himself, an Americans American, was so supportive of Israel, a political situation was created whereby a politicians commitment to Israel is seen as a test of that politicians loyalty to America itself. This brick wall of American support for Israel which Bush erected no doubt shaped President Obamas position, if not his personal views, on Israel. It has enabled the USIsrael relationship to endure despite the undeniable friction between the two countries throughout Obamas first term.
The final act for which we owe Bush a great debt of gratitude is his execution of TARP the bailout by which Bush saved the American economy from complete collapse. He did so without hesitation though it earned him the scorn of many free-marketers.
The irony of Obamas continued laying of blame on economic policies from the eight years before I took office is that like 9/11, the meltdown was a crisis of disastrous proportions the seeds of which were sown long before. Just as Bush ditched his humble foreign policy and rose to the occasion to defend us after 9/11, so too did he, in his own words, abandon... freemarket principles to do what was necessary when financial ruin threatened.
GEORGE W. Bush was delegitimized at every step of his presidency. From being accused of having stolen the election (though independent recounts have shown that Bush still would have won), to being called a racist on national television by an immature celebrity, to the claim that he lied to the American people regarding weapons of mass destruction in order to wage the Iraq War, on which, it has been said, Bushs legacy will hinge.
History will judge us was the refrain Bush, Tony Blair and many conservatives had throughout the war. At the opening of his presidential library, Bush maintained that attitude, saying, History will ultimately judge the decisions that were made for Iraq....
No WMDs were found, nor was the mission accomplished with the fall of Saddam Hussein, but perhaps the assumption that Bush will be judged mostly on the Iraq war is itself wrong. Bush was not a perfect man, but he led America in times of great crisis with moral courage. He secured America from another 9/11, he saved it from another great depression and renewed its commitment to its founding values. For all that, I believe history will judge him kindly.
I still am very disappointed that he held the door wide open to Barack Obama. I truly believe that GW is a good man, but I also think he was mistaken in trying to be a “me, too!” kinda leader. He should’ve held to conservative principles; instead, he gave way and ultimately helped the Dems regain enough power to shove catastrophic stuff down our throats.
Thank You Bushes for giving(inflicting) this nation BOTH the Clinton’s AND the Obamas.
I voted for Bush, I was a self-declared Bush-bot, but even then I was extremely disappointed in his unwillingness to defend himself on anything. That entire strategy is what derailed his presidency.
Do you think that Obama, if he’d proclaimed WMDs, would have been silent about the finds that were made, to include recipes, old weapons, and fingerprints suggesting the wmds had been moved?
No. He’d have been all over that defending himself. And the result would be that the public would at a minimum understand there were 2 sides to the story.
” He shouldve held to conservative principles” the BUSHES NEVER had ANY “conservative principles” to hold on to.
Still waiting for someone to thank Carter for giving us Reagan.
There is a major reason why we have Barak Obama as president, and it doesn’t get discussed much here because places like this website are very much to blame: Litmus tests are making it very difficult for any conservative to emerge from the primary scrum. So instead of nominiating an electable candidate who will take the fight directly to Obama, we have nominated two successive “nice guy” moderates who never polled above 25% in early voting.
I still believe Newt Gingrich would be president right now if he wasn’t destroyed by this website.
Saddam flew his fighters to Iran! Imagine that! I suppose it’s not likely he trucked his WMDs to Syria. Our troops found where they had been, but not where they were, hence, Bush lied?
Journalism is a respectable and nessesary field. Sadly, it died with H L Mencken, Samuel Clemens, and Will Rogers.
Didn’t GHWB41 reach the dizzying heights of 92% approval in the early stages of the first Gulf War?
” There is a major reason why we have Barak Obama as president, and it doesnt get discussed much here because places like this website are very much to blame:”
I should rephrase that: It gets discussed around here all the time. Especically during the last two presidential elections when it was actually happening.
We had ended up with John McCain and Mitt Romney successively because the candidates spent six months attacking eachother’s conservative bona fides. And anyone who went off message for one sound bite lost 6 points overnight in an election that was one by a moderate who was polling in the 20’s.
” We had ended up with John McCain and Mitt Romney successively because the candidates spent six months attacking eachothers conservative bona fides.”
Ironic, seeing as neither of these bozos HAD any conservative credentials : )
A day after someone thanks Nixon and/or Ford for Carter.
Old man Bush (no new taxes) opened the door for the Clintons and GWB opened the door for Bam. George never vetoed anything and let the RATS crap all over him without him or his cohorts fighting back
How about we thank the Detroit Tigers for giving us the San Fransisco Giants, and put that useless meme to rest for good?
Obama, we have nominated two successive nice guy moderates
Still love W!
If this were facebook, i would hit “like.”
At 8:46AM on September 11th, 2001 the George W. Bush Presidency became about making sure this country was safe from terrorist attacks. He succeed at this most important task.
when it is discovered that a US president protects and placates to the top tier of the power elites and the WALL STREET bankster corporate world and then uses propaganda to hide their own complicity, in every instance it has been at the expense of the American people. Those president’s popularity tanked and they left office with a legacy of being corrupt. Ronald Reagan was probably the least corrupt president this country has had in the past 100+ years but even he had to be disingenuous to the people at the expectation of those same elite powers.
Oh, bullcrap. He had a ton of baggage to begin with and Romney put more effort into attacking GOP opponents than he did in attacking Obama.
Primaries are rough-and-tumble. Always have been, always will be. We got the likes of Romney and McCain because of the GOP-E and the fact that too many conservative candidates split the primary vote. And the anti-Romney candidates were pretty feeble as well.
I am having trouble translating the point you are trying to make. You sound like a 9/11 Truther.
If you have a policy axe to grind with Gingrich, by all means do so. But don't hide behind the mistaken idea that he was somehow unelectable.
I am going after your ludicrous claim that FR is to blame for taking down Gingrich.
W, representative of a political dynasty and big government, gave us the DHS, the federal military force that will eventually be turned against the people.
Quite true, except for the case with Herman Cain. If that wicked witch from the east (Gloria Allred) had an ounce of decency, I maintain HE would be president today.
There was pretty widespread support for him, even here, until he was forced to drop out of the race.
Not to mention that there hasn't been a conservative candidate worth squat.
In 2008, Thompson couldn't bring himself to actually compete. Huckabee was...well, Huckabee. Romney was probably the best candidate...but couldn't defeat the weakest GOP candidate since Alf Landon, John Sidney (just call me "Loser") McCain.
So, in 2012, we finally got Romney...because Gingrich was a two-ton truck with five tons of baggage...and Santorum couldn't draw flies.
If we're going to win an election, we need a candidate who actually deserves to win!
Thank you for nothing George Bush. You sat on your butt while Obama kill this country.
No, now you're arguing against a different point, and it's not the same one I initially made. That's called a straw man. Homey don't play that.
I was a Herman Cain supporter right up until the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel interview where he demonstrated an alarming lack of familiarity with foreign policy issues. I could care less whether he did or did not have an affair.
Freeper BDS is as strong as ever. He did the best he could considering the Congress he was dealt.
Pray for America to Wake Up
I think GW Bush was a Harvard frat boy all along, but like to play the “country boy” role for our consumption. The guy expanded federal intrusion into education, gave us a massively expensive drug plan, and did nothing to deter Iran or Pakistan.
There is a major reason why we have Barak Obama as president, and it doesnt get discussed much here because places like this website are very much to blame ... I still believe Newt Gingrich would be president right now if he wasnt destroyed by this website.
Own up to your own posts, dude.
With all due respect, Newt Gingrich wasn't destroyed by this website. He was destroyed by his own past. there were simply too many skeletons there.
The fact that Newt was surpassed by a candidate as weak as Rick Santorum should be sufficient evidence of his actual stature.
Any capable conservative President would be well-advised to have Newt on his side and in his "kitchen cabinet". But Newt will never be President.
And I'm not saying he wouldn't have been a good President...just that he'll never be elected. And he has nobody to blame but himself...
And I figure good candidates in 2012 stayed away because they knew Romney would fight harder against them than Obama, and events proved that out.
Obama was weak with four years under his belt. He's going have the Dems in worse shape come 2016 than the GOP was under Bush in 2008. THAT is when I think we'll see some better candidates.
8 years squandered. Zero progress on any of the major threats to the country’s existence.
Why don't you redirect your hatred where it belongs, the liberals and the MSM propaganda machine which spent every second of the day for 8 years trying to destroy the credibility of G.W. Bush?
Lets start with the three year, daily front page investigation of the Bush administration and who was responsible for "outing" the alleged "covert CIA agent" named Valerie Plame in retaliation for her husband's editorial which has since proven to be a lie. And what was the final outcome of that "MEDIA TRIAL"?
You want to bring up the nomination of Edwards? Virtually every conservative on this site applauded his nomination to the Supreme Court and rejoiced when he was confirmed.
You think the crash of the stock market and the burst of the housing market due to the failing of Fannie and Freddie was the fault of Bush? That's what your MSM told you and the rest of the ignorant voters in this country.
Sorry bro but Bush didn't give us Obama, your MSM did..........
Ra ra sis-boom-bah....y’all.
At any rate, you and I agree: the circular firing squad we conservatives seem to form every election cycle has got to be disbanded. It’s as if, to some, the word pragmatism is of no value whatsoever.
We had a glut of conservative candidates at the beginning of 2011, and all because of, really, petty politics and childish favoritism, once a group chose their own messiah, there was no rallying around anyone who naturally jumped out in front early on, because the prevailing mentality here (and elsewhere) was: damn the torpedoes, it’s either my guy or no guy.
That’s the key really, we have to realize here we are only part of conservatism, part of the movement. We have to be willing to set our favorite pet candidate aside early, to allow another, perhaps not as “perfect” as we would individually like but still far more conservative than a Romney or McCain, to support and increase any natural early momentum such a candidate may enjoy early, so as to ride out the “chosen” candidate that comes along later. Or else 2016 is going to be another defeat like 2012.
Not that it matters much anymore, unless by some miracle Obamacare gets repealed or at least defunded. It’s still reality though. The Dems sure don’t fall for things like Operation Chaos. I don’t understand why we let ourselves be equally duped.
In case you missed it, all that evidence was shown in a slide show presentation by then Sec. of State Colin Powell, including aerial photographs of the convoys leaving Iraq heading for Syria...
Knowing what we know now, I challege you to find one liberal who would acknowledge that it was Barney Frank and his co- conspirators who brought down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, or that Hussein's chemical weapons ended up in Syrian hands, or any of the other bogus charges that the MSM attacked Bush on........
Point being, there is not a God damn thing the Bush administration could have done or said that would have forced the MSM to actually tell the truth.......
They knew from the beginning of any of their lies what the truth was and they failed to print it, instead going with the liberal talking point lies.
Gawd, I hope so!
Missed that one. When did it happen?
And while we're at it, Jim can endorse whoever he likes on behalf of his website, but he obviously doesn't speak for anyone who posts here. Other than himself, of course.
As if historically there isn’t a switch in parties after two (or three) terms of one party in office.
And who wouldn't have that you would have voted for?
That's bullshit and you know it. Once again, Bush Sr, was equally destroyed by the MSM for engaging in the Gulf war, despite the UN mandate to do so.
He was excoriated for it and there are liberals today that will cite the Gulf War as their initial hatred for the Bush family.....
The most common meme being G.W. Bush went to war to avenge the assassinination attempt on his daddy by Saddam Hussein........
Tobasco, I spent months researching the reality of wmds in Iraq. Moreover, my own son saw them. I have no doubt.
GW, a president I fully supported on almost everything, failed to defend his administration. He simply wouldn’t do it. I believe it was Cheney who said about a year ago that that was one of their big mistakes.
Big mistake...it was a terrible decision. It was unilateral disarmament. GW play rope-a-dope when as the president he could have mentioned it at every press conference and every speech and every state of the union. He didn’t even have his own cabinet defend his decisions. They were silent.
And it killed his numbers, and that’s just a fact.