Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Four key Hillary Clinton staffers from 2008 unlikely to sign on for 2016 bid
Washington Post ^ | May 20, 2013 | Jason Horowitz

Posted on 05/20/2013 12:33:09 PM PDT by presidio9

Howard Wolfson, the 2008 communications director for Hillary Rodham Clinton, has said he will not return for a 2016 presidential campaign. Neither, for that matter, will Neera Tanden, the campaign’s policy director. Ditto for Mark Penn, the chief strategist, and Patti Solis Doyle, the embattled campaign manager.

As core members of a dysfunctional “Team of Rivals,” these top advisers were seared, scattered and, to different degrees, forged by the 2008 experience. Haunted by the failures in management and messaging, they have worked hard to get over their shattered White House dreams and rejection by a Democratic base enamored with Barack Obama. They express their requisite hope that Clinton will run and win, but also their lack of interest in jumping back in.

Clinton, who declined to be interviewed, moved on more quickly than many of her senior staff by going to work for Obama as secretary of state. She refuses to acknowledge the 2016 speculation but has privately suggested that the obstacles to running aren’t exactly insurmountable. “She did tell me once that she was really thinking about Chelsea and [son-in-law] Marc,” said Susie Tompkins Buell, a Democratic donor and friend of Clinton, “and how she didn’t want to disrupt their lives.”

The 2008 campaign did precisely that to many of Hillaryland’s denizens. It was a campaign structure that pitted an “A team” of advisers against one another and created a climate of anxiety as a “B team” of potential outside replacements from the Clintons’ White House and Senate orbits hovered.

Now, as Clinton repositions on issues

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clinton; election2016; hillary2016; hillaryclinton; hrc

1 posted on 05/20/2013 12:33:09 PM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Well, we know who definitely won’t be helping Hillary in 2016.

Bill Gwatney...

People often have accidents when Chicago politics comes into play.


2 posted on 05/20/2013 12:46:06 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
They don't want to tangle with Organizing for Obama again. OfO will have a horse in the race. Deval Patrick would be my guess; he has a long history with Axelrod.
3 posted on 05/20/2013 12:55:57 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything. Bolshies' gonna bolsh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

4 posted on 05/20/2013 1:00:59 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's next run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon; Paine in the Neck

One aspect of this story that I don’t hear a lot of people talking about is how her Democrat rivals will use it when the primaries begin. Sure, some of them may be circling the wagons around here right now, but that will change when she starts out with a HUGE name recognition lead. I know I would find a way to use this ammunition if I were in that position.


5 posted on 05/20/2013 1:02:05 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The question that must be asked before the Dim primaries: Who controls the IRS?


6 posted on 05/20/2013 1:05:25 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
One aspect of this story that I don’t hear a lot of people talking about is how her Democrat rivals will use it when the primaries begin.

Yes, I've commented about that before. Her intra party rivals must be licking their chops waiting for the Benghazi hearings to develop further. If she runs it has the potential to get positively Shakespearean in its bloody intrigue.

7 posted on 05/20/2013 1:11:58 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything. Bolshies' gonna bolsh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck
This is one of the reasons why I want people on this side of the aisle to control themselves. Short of a tape or a handwritten note from Obama to the IRS ordering them to go after conservative groups, he might get roughed up a bit, but he's not going anywhere. So in order to make the best use of this scandal it is important that the hearings seem as nonpartisan (and no vindictave) as possible.

We only want the truth so her friends can nail it to her.

8 posted on 05/20/2013 1:19:26 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks presidio9. Ron Brown?


9 posted on 05/20/2013 4:39:18 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson