Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo

What do you mean, “why isn’t it unconstitutional the other?”


34 posted on 05/20/2013 8:14:21 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Conscience of a Conservative

Kevmo: Wouldn’t it be interesting to propose and enforce a law that requires that ~50% of contributions from IRS personnel be to each party evenly? A “proactive reverse discrimination” such as the Bakke case in California.

COAC: Interesting, but blatantly unconstitutional.... What do you mean, “why isn’t it unconstitutional the other?”
***You claim that my proposal is unconstitutional. And yet, currently the IRS operates openly in antagonism to conservative groups, in an unconstitutional fashion. Why isn’t that unconstitutional?


37 posted on 05/20/2013 8:24:59 PM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson