Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to Wake Up: GOP Opposition to Climate Science (Full Sheldon Whitehouse Bizarre Tornado Rant)
Sheldon Whitehouse (Senate Website) ^ | May 20, 2013 | Sheldon Whitehouse

Posted on 05/20/2013 7:36:20 PM PDT by PJ-Comix

Mr./Madam President, every week we’re here I try to remind this body of the damage that carbon pollution is doing to our atmosphere and oceans, try to awaken us to our duty.  I’ve done it thirty-three times now.  I’ve tried to kick out the underpinnings of any argument the deniers could stand on. 

I’ve kicked out the scientific denial argument, which properly belongs in the category of falsehood.  I’ve kicked out the economic denial argument, pointing out that in a proper market the costs of carbon must be in the price of carbon.  I tried to kick out the religious denial argument, showing that the belief that God will just tidy up after us however stupidly we behave runs counter to history and Biblical text. 

Today, let’s take a crack at the political argument.  How wise is it for the Republican Party to wed itself to the deniers and proclaim that climate change is a hoax?

Make no mistake.  That is the default Republican position.  The default Republican position is that climate change is a hoax.  It’s been said right on this floor, and in committees, and I haven’t seen a single Republican Senator stand up afterwards in this chamber to say, “Wait a minute, that’s actually not the case.”

The chamber looks empty, but on C-SPAN lots of people are watching.  Lots of Republicans are watching.  Yet not one Republican has ever gotten back to me, even quietly on the side, to say, “You know what?  This is really getting serious.  Let’s see if we can work on this.” 

An iron curtain of denial has fallen around the Republican Party.  So let me respectfully ask my Republican colleagues:  what are you thinking?  How do you imagine this ends? 

More than 95 percent of climate scientists are convinced that human carbon pollution is causing massive and unprecedented change to our atmosphere and oceans. You want to go with the five percent, and you think that’s a winning strategy?

Moreover, it turns out a lot of those five-percenters are on the payroll of the polluters.  You know that.  It’s public knowledge.  Some of those “payroll scientists” are the same people who denied acid rain, or the dangers of tobacco.

You still like those odds?  Those are the folks to whom you want to hitch your Republican wagons?  You’ve got to know that they aren’t telling the truth.  So where does this go?  What’s your end game?

Our planet has had a run of at least 800,000 years with levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere between 170 and 300 ppm.  That’s measurement; not theory.   Eight hundred thousand years.  Homo sapiens have only been around for about 200,000 years, so that 800,000 years—8,000 centuries—takes you back a ways.  Eight hundred thousand years between 170 and 300 ppm, and in just the last 50 years we’ve blown out of that range, and have now hit 400 ppm and climbing. 

And you want to be on the side of “nothing’s going on”?  Really?

Have you noticed the floods and wildfires and droughts and superstorms and tornadoes and blizzards and temperature records?  Have you noticed those warming, rising seas?  Have you noticed species invading new territory, and miles of dead pine forests in the Rockies, and Arctic sea ice disappearing?

Do you understand that carbon in the atmosphere gets absorbed by the sea, and that that is a law of science and is not debatable?  Do you understand that because they are absorbing the carbon the oceans are getting more acidic?  Thirty percent more acidic already and climbing?  Do you understand that's a measurement, not a theory?

It’s one thing to be the party that stands against science.  Are you really also going to be the party that stands against measurement? 

And do you know the measurement is showing that the ocean are not just becoming more acidic, they’re becoming more acidic at the fastest rate recorded in a geologic record of 50 million years?

Have you not heard about the coral reefs, those incubators of the ocean, bleaching out and dying off?  With almost twenty percent gone already worldwide?

If you’re a denier, look around.  Do you think the news is getting better for you? 

Let me ask my Republican friends, what’s your best bet on whether this climate and oceans problem gets better or worse in the next 20 or 40 years?  Seriously.  Your party’s reputation is on the line here—all the chips; tell me how you’re going to bet.  Do you want to bet the reputation of the Republican Party that suddenly this is all going to magically start getting better?  ‘Cause that’s what you’re doing.

And let me ask you this: what are the young people of today going to think when they are thirty-seven, or fifty-seven, and it really is worse, maybe a lot worse?  What are they going to think about the Republican Party then?  That you took the five percent bet with their futures?  That you went with the polluters over the scientists? 

Young people are already out there asking their universities to divest from coal, like they divested from the evils of apartheid and the dangers of tobacco.  Good luck with that youth vote when you lock in with the coal merchants. 

And the youth vote grows up and sticks around.

How’s it going to look for the Republican Party when the historical record shows—because facts have a funny way of coming out—that the campaign to fool the public on climate change was just as phony and dishonest as the campaign to fool the public on acid rain and the campaign to fool the public on tobacco?  When the historical record discloses that the five percent wasn’t even real and was actually a scam, paid for by the polluters? 

And you, with young Americans’ futures in the balance, took sides with the scam.  If that is the state of play for young voters as they come of age, why would those young people ever trust the Republican Party, on anything else, ever again?

Speaking of taking sides, have you noticed who’s left on your side?  The Koch brothers—billionaire polluters;  the big oil companies -- the biggest polluters in the world;  the coal barons—with their legacy of pollution, strip mining, “mountaintop removal,” and safety violations that kill their miners.  There’s a fine cast to be surrounded by.

But wait, you say, there’s more.  There’s the Heartland Institute, and the Institute for Energy Research, and the American Enterprise Institute, and the American Legislative Exchange Council; and the Heritage Foundation.  There are many organizations. 

Right.  Like the heads of Hydra, they may look like many, but in reality it’s all the same beast.  It’s all the same scheme.  It’s all the same money behind the scheme.  You can name those front organizations, and many more, but none of it is real.  They’re all just part of the same cheesy vaudeville show put on by the big polluters. 

Do you really want to lash yourself to that operation, and go down with that ship?  The great Republican Party, the party of Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt, branding itself as the one that gave it all to protect a gang of scheming polluters?  That’s where you’re headed.

Look who’s on the other side, on record, against you, seeing through that nonsense.  How about the Joint Chiefs of Staff, our military leaders?  How about the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops?  How about NASA?  NASA’s driving a vehicle as big as an SUV around on the surface of Mars right now.  They sent it there, to Mars; they landed it safely, and now they’re driving it around.  On Mars.  Do you think those scientists just might know what they’re talking about? 

How about every legitimate American scientific professional society -- about thirty of them?  How about major American corporations like Walmart, Ford, Apple, or Coca-Cola?  How about global insurance and reinsurance businesses, like Lloyd’s of London and Munich Re, whose business depends on accurate risk models? 

Whose side do you like in that? 

In this corner, the Joint Chiefs, the bishops, Walmart, Ford, Apple, Coke, NASA, thirty top scientific organizations, the top insurers and reinsurers, and by the way several thousand legitimate others. 

In that corner, the polluting industry and a screen of sketchy organizations they fund. 

Let’s be serious.  Do you really want to bet the reputation of the Republican Party that the polluters are the ones we should count on here?   ‘Cause that’s what you’re doing.

And for what?  To protect market share for the polluters.  That’s your upside.  Market share for polluters. 

I’m willing to do a carbon pollution fee that sets the market in balance, and returns every single dollar to the American people.  No new agencies.  No new taxes.  No bigger government.  Every dollar back.  Just a balanced market, with the costs included in the price, which will make better energy choices, increase jobs, and prevent pollution.  Yes, that does mean less market share for the polluters as new technologies emerge.  That’s actually the point.  But every single dollar back in Americans’ pockets.

And by the way, the American people -- three-quarters of them believe that climate change is real and that we need to do something about it. 

So you may have a question for me:  why do you care?  Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care if we Republicans run off the climate cliff like a bunch of proverbial lemmings, and disgrace ourselves? 

I’ll tell you why.  We’re stuck in this together.  When cyclones tear up Oklahoma, and hurricanes swamp Alabama, and wildfires scorch Texas, you come to us, for billions of dollars to recover. 

And the damage your polluters and deniers are doing doesn’t just hit Oklahoma and Alabama and Texas; it hits Rhode Island with floods and storms, and Oregon with acidified seas, and Montana with dying forests.  So like it or not, we’re in this together. 

You drag America with you to your fate. 

I want this future: a Republican Party that has returned to its senses, and is a strong and worthy adversary; in a strong America, that has done right by its people and the world.  That’s what I want.

I don't want this future:  a Republican Party disgraced, that let its extremists run it off the cliff; in an America suffering from grave economic and environmental and diplomatic damage, because we didn’t wake up and do our duty to our people, and lead the world. 

I do not want that future.  But that’s where you’re headed. 

So I’ll keep reaching out and calling out, ever hopeful that you will wake up, before it is too late, both for you, and for the rest of us.

I yield the floor.

Mr./Madam President, every week we’re here I try to remind this body of the damage that carbon pollution is doing to our atmosphere and oceans, try to awaken us to our duty.  I’ve done it thirty-three times now.  I’ve tried to kick out the underpinnings of any argument the deniers could stand on. 

I’ve kicked out the scientific denial argument, which properly belongs in the category of falsehood.  I’ve kicked out the economic denial argument, pointing out that in a proper market the costs of carbon must be in the price of carbon.  I tried to kick out the religious denial argument, showing that the belief that God will just tidy up after us however stupidly we behave runs counter to history and Biblical text. 

Today, let’s take a crack at the political argument.  How wise is it for the Republican Party to wed itself to the deniers and proclaim that climate change is a hoax?

Make no mistake.  That is the default Republican position.  The default Republican position is that climate change is a hoax.  It’s been said right on this floor, and in committees, and I haven’t seen a single Republican Senator stand up afterwards in this chamber to say, “Wait a minute, that’s actually not the case.”

The chamber looks empty, but on C-SPAN lots of people are watching.  Lots of Republicans are watching.  Yet not one Republican has ever gotten back to me, even quietly on the side, to say, “You know what?  This is really getting serious.  Let’s see if we can work on this.” 

An iron curtain of denial has fallen around the Republican Party.  So let me respectfully ask my Republican colleagues:  what are you thinking?  How do you imagine this ends? 

More than 95 percent of climate scientists are convinced that human carbon pollution is causing massive and unprecedented change to our atmosphere and oceans. You want to go with the five percent, and you think that’s a winning strategy?

Moreover, it turns out a lot of those five-percenters are on the payroll of the polluters.  You know that.  It’s public knowledge.  Some of those “payroll scientists” are the same people who denied acid rain, or the dangers of tobacco.

You still like those odds?  Those are the folks to whom you want to hitch your Republican wagons?  You’ve got to know that they aren’t telling the truth.  So where does this go?  What’s your end game?

Our planet has had a run of at least 800,000 years with levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere between 170 and 300 ppm.  That’s measurement; not theory.   Eight hundred thousand years.  Homo sapiens have only been around for about 200,000 years, so that 800,000 years—8,000 centuries—takes you back a ways.  Eight hundred thousand years between 170 and 300 ppm, and in just the last 50 years we’ve blown out of that range, and have now hit 400 ppm and climbing. 

And you want to be on the side of “nothing’s going on”?  Really?

Have you noticed the floods and wildfires and droughts and superstorms and tornadoes and blizzards and temperature records?  Have you noticed those warming, rising seas?  Have you noticed species invading new territory, and miles of dead pine forests in the Rockies, and Arctic sea ice disappearing?

Do you understand that carbon in the atmosphere gets absorbed by the sea, and that that is a law of science and is not debatable?  Do you understand that because they are absorbing the carbon the oceans are getting more acidic?  Thirty percent more acidic already and climbing?  Do you understand that's a measurement, not a theory?

It’s one thing to be the party that stands against science.  Are you really also going to be the party that stands against measurement? 

And do you know the measurement is showing that the ocean are not just becoming more acidic, they’re becoming more acidic at the fastest rate recorded in a geologic record of 50 million years?

Have you not heard about the coral reefs, those incubators of the ocean, bleaching out and dying off?  With almost twenty percent gone already worldwide?

If you’re a denier, look around.  Do you think the news is getting better for you? 

Let me ask my Republican friends, what’s your best bet on whether this climate and oceans problem gets better or worse in the next 20 or 40 years?  Seriously.  Your party’s reputation is on the line here—all the chips; tell me how you’re going to bet.  Do you want to bet the reputation of the Republican Party that suddenly this is all going to magically start getting better?  ‘Cause that’s what you’re doing.

And let me ask you this: what are the young people of today going to think when they are thirty-seven, or fifty-seven, and it really is worse, maybe a lot worse?  What are they going to think about the Republican Party then?  That you took the five percent bet with their futures?  That you went with the polluters over the scientists? 

Young people are already out there asking their universities to divest from coal, like they divested from the evils of apartheid and the dangers of tobacco.  Good luck with that youth vote when you lock in with the coal merchants. 

And the youth vote grows up and sticks around.

How’s it going to look for the Republican Party when the historical record shows—because facts have a funny way of coming out—that the campaign to fool the public on climate change was just as phony and dishonest as the campaign to fool the public on acid rain and the campaign to fool the public on tobacco?  When the historical record discloses that the five percent wasn’t even real and was actually a scam, paid for by the polluters? 

And you, with young Americans’ futures in the balance, took sides with the scam.  If that is the state of play for young voters as they come of age, why would those young people ever trust the Republican Party, on anything else, ever again?

Speaking of taking sides, have you noticed who’s left on your side?  The Koch brothers—billionaire polluters;  the big oil companies -- the biggest polluters in the world;  the coal barons—with their legacy of pollution, strip mining, “mountaintop removal,” and safety violations that kill their miners.  There’s a fine cast to be surrounded by.

But wait, you say, there’s more.  There’s the Heartland Institute, and the Institute for Energy Research, and the American Enterprise Institute, and the American Legislative Exchange Council; and the Heritage Foundation.  There are many organizations. 

Right.  Like the heads of Hydra, they may look like many, but in reality it’s all the same beast.  It’s all the same scheme.  It’s all the same money behind the scheme.  You can name those front organizations, and many more, but none of it is real.  They’re all just part of the same cheesy vaudeville show put on by the big polluters. 

Do you really want to lash yourself to that operation, and go down with that ship?  The great Republican Party, the party of Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt, branding itself as the one that gave it all to protect a gang of scheming polluters?  That’s where you’re headed.

Look who’s on the other side, on record, against you, seeing through that nonsense.  How about the Joint Chiefs of Staff, our military leaders?  How about the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops?  How about NASA?  NASA’s driving a vehicle as big as an SUV around on the surface of Mars right now.  They sent it there, to Mars; they landed it safely, and now they’re driving it around.  On Mars.  Do you think those scientists just might know what they’re talking about? 

How about every legitimate American scientific professional society -- about thirty of them?  How about major American corporations like Walmart, Ford, Apple, or Coca-Cola?  How about global insurance and reinsurance businesses, like Lloyd’s of London and Munich Re, whose business depends on accurate risk models? 

Whose side do you like in that? 

In this corner, the Joint Chiefs, the bishops, Walmart, Ford, Apple, Coke, NASA, thirty top scientific organizations, the top insurers and reinsurers, and by the way several thousand legitimate others. 

In that corner, the polluting industry and a screen of sketchy organizations they fund. 

Let’s be serious.  Do you really want to bet the reputation of the Republican Party that the polluters are the ones we should count on here?   ‘Cause that’s what you’re doing.

And for what?  To protect market share for the polluters.  That’s your upside.  Market share for polluters. 

I’m willing to do a carbon pollution fee that sets the market in balance, and returns every single dollar to the American people.  No new agencies.  No new taxes.  No bigger government.  Every dollar back.  Just a balanced market, with the costs included in the price, which will make better energy choices, increase jobs, and prevent pollution.  Yes, that does mean less market share for the polluters as new technologies emerge.  That’s actually the point.  But every single dollar back in Americans’ pockets.

And by the way, the American people -- three-quarters of them believe that climate change is real and that we need to do something about it. 

So you may have a question for me:  why do you care?  Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care if we Republicans run off the climate cliff like a bunch of proverbial lemmings, and disgrace ourselves? 

I’ll tell you why.  We’re stuck in this together.  When cyclones tear up Oklahoma, and hurricanes swamp Alabama, and wildfires scorch Texas, you come to us, for billions of dollars to recover. 

And the damage your polluters and deniers are doing doesn’t just hit Oklahoma and Alabama and Texas; it hits Rhode Island with floods and storms, and Oregon with acidified seas, and Montana with dying forests.  So like it or not, we’re in this together. 

You drag America with you to your fate. 

I want this future: a Republican Party that has returned to its senses, and is a strong and worthy adversary; in a strong America, that has done right by its people and the world.  That’s what I want.

I don't want this future:  a Republican Party disgraced, that let its extremists run it off the cliff; in an America suffering from grave economic and environmental and diplomatic damage, because we didn’t wake up and do our duty to our people, and lead the world. 

I do not want that future.  But that’s where you’re headed. 

So I’ll keep reaching out and calling out, ever hopeful that you will wake up, before it is too late, both for you, and for the rest of us.

I yield the floor.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alabama; US: Oklahoma; US: Oregon; US: Rhode Island; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: alabama; globalwarming; moonbat; oklahoma; oregon; rhodeisland; sheldonwhitehouse; stupididiot; texas
I wanted to reprint the full sanity-challenged rant of Sheldon Whitehouse before he can remove it from the web in embarrassment at his own words.
1 posted on 05/20/2013 7:36:20 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Somebody get this guy a straightjacket.


2 posted on 05/20/2013 7:41:52 PM PDT by henkster (I have one more cow than my neighbor. I am a kulak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

It must be wonderful going through life and getting for a job where opinions matter and facts are irrelevant.


3 posted on 05/20/2013 7:42:08 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Liberals have no shame.

His statements will stand, and dozens of other Liberals will join him in support.

It’s what they do.


4 posted on 05/20/2013 7:43:28 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Just ask the Democrat how mankind has influenced the path of the magnetic north pole that is aligning with the geographic north pole to decrease the dynamo output. This decreases the earth’s polarity and the magnetosphere, making us vulnerable to coronal mass ejections which can greatly influence our climate.

The Canadian Geophysics website even shows that the path of the magnetic north pole has up to an 85 kilometer per day wobble that changes in direct relationship with solar activity.

The planetary alignment talked about in end times is not the other planets in space, but the internal alignment of our poles.


5 posted on 05/20/2013 7:44:27 PM PDT by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Didn’t he slip a digit in there somewhere?

Isn’t the total CO2 level well within the range of the last cycles during the last hundreds of thousand years??


6 posted on 05/20/2013 7:44:41 PM PDT by Noob1999 (Loose Lips, Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Sheldon the Clown

7 posted on 05/20/2013 7:46:13 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

He needs to be drug tested.

Seriously.


8 posted on 05/20/2013 7:47:20 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Send Sheldon a hockey stick. Tell him where he can put it.


9 posted on 05/20/2013 7:48:29 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Hey Sheldon,

I’m 50 yrs old and have been hearing how we’re DOOMED since I was 5 yrs old. That’s 45 years. Climate’s still the same as then.

The only REAL difference? - guys like Algore are making MILLIONS off of this hoax.

And you base your ‘facts’ on theory. How do you know the earth is 800,000 yrs. old?
Answer: By the same faith it takes for ME to believe that God created it less than 10,000 years ago and will end it when HE decides. Not us.


10 posted on 05/20/2013 7:54:23 PM PDT by joethedrummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/1975-tornado-outbreaks-blamed-on-global-cooling/ Someboy send him this where global cooling was blamed for tornado activity increasing in the 1970;s


11 posted on 05/20/2013 7:56:28 PM PDT by scbison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

The climate is the very least of the Democrat’s worries right now. This country is ready to go French Revolution on their asses.


12 posted on 05/20/2013 7:57:14 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (Thy Kingdom come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Senator Whitehouse, you Democrats control the Senate and the White House. So why are you blaming the Republicans? This tornado obviously must be OBAMA’S FAULT.


13 posted on 05/20/2013 7:57:49 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Sheldon seldom makes sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
It must be wonderful going through life and getting for a job where opinions matter and facts are irrelevant.

Present culture doesn't much distinguish between facts and opinions or perhaps worse, between thinking and feeling.
14 posted on 05/20/2013 7:59:53 PM PDT by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Senator Whitehouse is apparently unfamiliar with our VERY large and aggressive EPA, which by the way was started by a Republican named Nixon, thank you very much;) How about pushing NUCLEAR energy, Senator? And go take up the matter of environmental degradation with CHINA, while you’re at it/s;)


15 posted on 05/20/2013 8:03:33 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
I’m willing to do a carbon pollution fee that sets the market in balance, and returns every single dollar to the American people.

Me too - just as soon as we impose a Dhimmicrat Pollution fee that undoes the damage that liberals inflict on our nation. ;-)

16 posted on 05/20/2013 8:05:15 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Has Nostrildamus joined this cretin? Henry Waxman that is.


17 posted on 05/20/2013 8:08:25 PM PDT by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: allendale

THAT IS A GREAT IDEA!!!!!!!

I really don’t type crazy all the time... Sometimes caps are appropriate.

Back to A$$wipe, we need to name the hockey sticks and decorate them.

Thoughts please!!

We need to do this, even if this A$$hat only gets 100 sticks by UPS he’ll know that he is a laughingstock nationwide.


18 posted on 05/20/2013 8:18:50 PM PDT by WomBom ("I read Free Republic for the pictures")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

See all that natural change that’s been happening for four and a half billion years? If you don’t change your ways, it’ll keep happening!!!

Sheldon Whitehouse is a demagogue, so it’s not surprising that he’s consistently incoherent.

Thanks PJ-Comix.


19 posted on 05/20/2013 8:31:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Whitehose is getting into the ‘Guam tipping’ degree of nuttiness. A total, complete, certified whack-job.
20 posted on 05/20/2013 8:31:53 PM PDT by JPG (Stay strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Here’s a hint - if there was really a consensus, we wouldn’t need UN consensus committees.


21 posted on 05/20/2013 8:39:20 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Let us suppose that the temperature of the earth’s atmosphere is rising, that the numbers so indicate.

Why should we believe that carbon dioxide, or any other gaseous component of the atmosphere is the cause?


22 posted on 05/20/2013 9:52:13 PM PDT by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Now I'm confused. Sheldon tells me, Have you noticed those warming, rising seas? Do you understand that carbon in the atmosphere gets absorbed by the sea, and that that is a law of science and is not debatable? Do you understand that because they are absorbing the carbon the oceans are getting more acidic? Thirty percent more acidic already and climbing? Do you understand that's a measurement, not a theory?

The scientists on the warmists payrolls tell us that warming oceans release CO2 while cooling oceans absorb it. But Sheldon is saying the exact opposite and mocking republicans as being unscientific. How can Sheldon be a denier of science facts of the very scientists he is lauding?

He sounds kind of stupid.

23 posted on 05/20/2013 11:02:35 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joethedrummer
"Our planet has had a run of at least 800,000 years with levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere between 170 and 300 ppm. That’s measurement; not theory. Eight hundred thousand years. Homo sapiens have only been around for about 200,000 years, so that 800,000 years—8,000 centuries—takes you back a ways. Eight hundred thousand years between 170 and 300 ppm, and in just the last 50 years we’ve blown out of that range, and have now hit 400 ppm and climbing"

Really Sheldon? Humans have been around for 200,000 years? And they were taking measurements of CO2 levels at the time? Not hunting for food or anything. Just sitting around measuring CO2 levels. And these ancient humans were SO precise in their measurements that you can take their data to the bank.

Even more amazing is that these pre-historic humans "caused" CO2 to go from 170ppm to 300ppm BEFORE SUVs? What are you some kind of creationist?

24 posted on 05/20/2013 11:27:31 PM PDT by boop ("You don't look so bad, here's another")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Have you noticed the floods and wildfires and droughts and superstorms and tornadoes and blizzards and temperature records?

I have noticed a lot of low temperature records lately. Even the first snow in May in Arkansas on record (although not a blizzard). I also notice the strong La Nina jet causing tornadoes in 2011 and the push of dry air that caused them yesterday. Did global warming cause that push of drier cooler air? I also notice that tornadoes peak in spring and fall with a lull in the summer. Why would warmer summers cause fewer tornadoes? Why have strong tornadoes been decreasing since the late 1800's and early 1900's (when we were coming out of the Little Ice Age)?

Cooling is our enemy. Cooling and idiots like the senator from RI.

25 posted on 05/21/2013 2:38:09 AM PDT by palmer (Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze; boop

CO2 is released by warming oceans but the (mostly natural) rise of 1C would have caused 5-10 ppm of CO2 to be released. Instead the oceans are absorbing CO2 rather than releasing it. At least that is the best explanation of where CO2 is going after fossil fuel burning creates it. That and biosphere expansion but the biosphere includes ocean algae that like that extra CO2.


26 posted on 05/21/2013 2:41:10 AM PDT by palmer (Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Second coolest spring on record... so it must be the heat.

lolz


27 posted on 05/21/2013 2:43:18 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Yo, Shelly.
Your ignoarnt little rant might approach relevance except for the inconvenient facts that global temperatures have been in decline for ~15 years and the junk scientists at the heart of the computer climate models that predicted the "hockey stick" have been busted for lying years ago now.
Do try to keep up.
28 posted on 05/21/2013 3:50:09 AM PDT by Amagi (Obama is never so animated as when he is assaulting the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Sheldon Whitehouse has a history of mental disorder. Check out his 2009 SPEECH in which he compares GOP opposition to ObamaCare to Kristallnacht and lynchings.
29 posted on 05/21/2013 6:28:07 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (Beware the Rip in the Space/Time Continuum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

http://theolympiareport.com/wwu-scientist-debunks-lawmakers-myths-about-co2-climate-change/


30 posted on 06/02/2013 11:41:06 AM PDT by jyro (French-like Democrats wave the white flag of surrender while we are winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson