Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why We Can't Forget That Oklahoma's Senators Voted Against Sandy Relief
Yahoo News ^ | 5/21/2013 | Alexander Abad-Santos

Posted on 05/21/2013 12:45:54 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Nearly four months ago, Oklahoma Senators Tom Coburn and James Inhofe both voted against H.R.152, the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act that eventually sent $50.5 billion in relief to victims of Hurricane Sandy. And in the flurry of last night's devastation in Moore, Oklahoma. it was impossible not to forget that fact, knowing the federal government would soon rally to the cause.

Part of that reason was because of the social media aspect to the storm—like the Boston Bombings and like Hurricane Sand —information on Monday's storm was quickly dispensed through mediums like Twitter and Facebook. But with that came tweets like this, from Current TV's David Shuster (retweeted 118 times):

Praying for OK victims, hoping federal aid/help won't be delayed like #Sandy when 32 Senators, including OK's Coburn + Inhofe, opposed it. — David Shuster (@DavidShuster) May 21, 2013

This one was retweeted 252 more times:

That awkward moment when Sen. Inhofe votes against government help for Sandy victims and then Oklahoma gets hit by a tornado. — Top Conservative Cat (@TeaPartyCat) May 21, 2013

And a quick search for "Inhofe" on Twitter turns a stream into a river of people talking about Inhofe's Sandy vote:

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: oklahoma
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: nickcarraway

Maybe it was to ensure they still have some for their own disasters.

Geesh, I tire of this federal welfare. Can’t anyone take care of themselves anymore?


21 posted on 05/21/2013 1:01:14 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

>> You have a problem with Arabo-Hispanics?

Giving second billing to the Romans, are you?


22 posted on 05/21/2013 1:03:33 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Andy why should they NOT have voted for Sandy relief? The relief bill was loaded with PORK for pet projects in other states that were never even in Sandy’s path!


23 posted on 05/21/2013 1:06:16 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (When someone burns a cross on your lawn, the best firehose is an AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

We might also remember that the Sandy relief bill was a giant pork fest with huge amounts of spending for things all over the country thrown in


24 posted on 05/21/2013 1:06:54 PM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

God bless you and your neighbors. Frankly, I don’t object to federal monies to help communities struck by natural disasters. Of all the wasteful federal spending out there, disaster relief is a small amount of money that usually does some good. I respect your self-reliant attitude.


25 posted on 05/21/2013 1:07:00 PM PDT by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
Maybe the OK senators couldn’t forget that Obama denied them any Federal assistance when the floods hit.

Wait! What?...

26 posted on 05/21/2013 1:08:42 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (Thy Kingdom come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The Federal government has no authority to be in the business of disaster relief. Were we freed from FEMA, people would have to purchase adequate insurance and would have more available for more effective charities that don't pose a risk to our liberty. The cost of that insurance would preclude many from assuming unacceptable risks.

Good systems prevent problems.

27 posted on 05/21/2013 1:08:47 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (An economy is not a zero-sum game, but politics usually is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thorvaldr

This is all about the fact that no county in OK went for Obama in 08 or 12.


28 posted on 05/21/2013 1:10:27 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
You might keep in mind that the Gov’s in the Sandy case, inflated their $10B in damages to a $60B political payoff, and OK only asks for what it needs.

It was actually congress who larded up the Sandy relief, adding money for a lot of non-Sandy related spending. Anyone who doesn't think this will also happen for any relief package for Oklahoma is only kidding themself.

29 posted on 05/21/2013 1:10:55 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Great post. Another area where the fedgov has over-ridden local govts and the private sector.

Whenever we have a river flood here in Indiana the news is full of peeps crying about their underwater house and where is FEMA?


30 posted on 05/21/2013 1:11:54 PM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Yeah! I need a new roof and I have ants under my house. Oh, and the wind is blowing. Where’s my check?


31 posted on 05/21/2013 1:11:56 PM PDT by beelzepug (Telling other people they need to die is a good way to get your own lamp blown out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Andy why should they NOT have voted for Sandy relief? The relief bill was loaded with PORK for pet projects in other states that were never even in Sandy’s path!

So when the same thing happens to any Oklahoma relief package, will they also vote against that on principle?

32 posted on 05/21/2013 1:12:04 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It was not a relief bill, it was a slush fund bill.


33 posted on 05/21/2013 1:16:06 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Coburn and Inhofe both supported funding Sandy relief for the ACTUAL estimated amount: $7 billion. THAT’S ALL that was required, in addition to fully funding the insurance program ($3.2 billion). The entire remainder of $49.5 billion was PORK. But weak-kneed and N.E. Republicans knuckled under to RINOs like Crispy Creme Christie, and caved.


34 posted on 05/21/2013 1:20:40 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act that eventually sent $50.5 billion in relief to victims of Hurricane Sandy”

Except that it didn’t. Instead it was a slush fund for Democrat operations and favorites.


35 posted on 05/21/2013 1:21:46 PM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The “aid” always goes to fellow members of the big-government/big-corporate criminal complex.


36 posted on 05/21/2013 1:22:09 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies." --Dr. Ben Carson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

Not Holder’s people in OK.


37 posted on 05/21/2013 1:22:55 PM PDT by ealgeone (obama, border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Folks ready for secession yet?


38 posted on 05/21/2013 1:24:15 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything. Bolshies' gonna bolsh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

What goes around comes around. They didn’t feel compassion for me; I can only do the same. Not one penny from me.


39 posted on 05/21/2013 1:26:04 PM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Why We Can't Forget That Oklahoma's Senators Voted Against Sandy Relief

That does not mean that charitable Sandy donations did not come from Oklahomans; and it does not persuade me to withhold tornado relief donations to Oklahoma.

40 posted on 05/21/2013 1:27:06 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson