Isn't this, exactly, how we ended up with Al Qaeda? And, aren't these rebels really Al Qaeda anyhow? And why are we now “officially” arming them when we've already been arming them. That's one of the reasons we wouldn't send rescue to Benghazi, I suspect, because our aircraft would have been shot down by our own shoulder fired missiles we had already provided Al Qaeda “rebels.”
posted on 05/22/2013 9:06:16 AM PDT
(Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
Notice that no one really asks those questions to those in power? If they do it's a one off like Rand Paul? Notice how the mainstream media ignores asking such questions? It starts to make one feel that there is some sort of collusion between news and Belt Way think Tank types when it comes to foreign policy and "We the people" who offer such pointed questions on American foreign policy are ignored.
The US Senate can barely agree on anything, including nominations by Obama yet the Republicans and Democrats in majorities back arming al-Qaeda linked rebels? That's odd to me.
posted on 05/22/2013 1:15:08 PM PDT
(I am a royalist and Jesus Christ is my king, Isus Xristos Nikas!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson